In this study we explored the experiences of younger people with dementia (age 60–67 years) using an action research methodology across three phases. Phase One involved interviews with participants (n = 8). Phases Two (n = 5) and Three (n = 4) consisted of two action research groups. Thematic analysis highlighted few difficulties commonly associated with younger people with dementia (e.g. loss of employment). Participants highlighted a need for social support from a variety of sources as well as the opportunity to develop a shared social identity and a focus on remaining strengths. The ‘action’ (Phase Three) comprised a leaflet written by participants for other people with dementia. The findings suggest there is a need for people with dementia to receive information from people who have experienced dementia and for that information to foster a sense of hope and resilience. Furthermore, the findings support the use of action research methodologies with people with dementia.
Alzheimer's Australia. (2007). Exploring the needs of younger people with dementia in Australia. New South Wales, Australia: Alzheimer's Australia.
2.
AndersenR.OadesL.CaputiP. (2003). The experience of recovery from schizophrenia: Towards an empirically validated stage model. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 37, 586–601.
3.
BeattieA.Daker-WhiteG.GilliardJ.MeansR. (2002). Younger people in dementia care: A review of service needs, service provision and models of good practice. Aging & Mental Health, 6, 205–212.
4.
BeattieA.Daker-WhiteG.GilliardJ.MeansR. (2004). ‘How can they tell?’ A qualitative study of the views of younger people about their dementia and dementia care services. Health and Social care in the Community, 12, 359–368.
5.
BenthamP.La FontaineJ. (2005). Services for younger people with dementia. Psychiatry, 4, 100–103.
6.
BondJ.CornerL.GrahamR. (2005). Social science theory on dementia research: Normal ageing, cultural representation and social exclusion. In InnesA.ArchibaldC.MurphyC. (Eds.), Dementia and social inclusion: Marginalised groups and marginalised areas of dementia research, care and practice (pp. 220–236). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
7.
BoyatzisR. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: SAGE Publications.
8.
Braudy HarrisP. (2004). The perspectives of younger people with dementia: Still an overlooked population. Social Work in Mental Health, 2, 17–36.
9.
Braudy HarrisP.DurkinC. (2002). Building resilience through coping and adapting. In Braudy HarrisP. (Ed.), The person with Alzheimer's disease: Pathways to understanding the experience (pp. 165–184). London: The John Hopkins University Press.
10.
Braudy HarrisP.KeadyJ. (2008). Wisdom, resilience and successful aging: Changing public discourses on living with dementia. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 7, 5–8.
11.
CantleyC.WoodhouseJ.SmithM. (2005). Listen to us: Involving people with dementia in planning and developing services. Newcastle: Dementia North, the dementia services development centre, Northumbria University.
12.
Care Services Improvement Partnership. (2007a). Strengthening the involvement of people with dementia: Supplementary resource. York: Care Services Improvement Partnership.
13.
Care Services Improvement Partnership. (2007b). Strengthening the involvement of people with dementia: A resource for implementation. York: Care Services Improvement Partnership.
14.
CharmazK. (1995). Grounded theory. In SmithJ. A.HarréR.Van LangenhoveL. (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 27–49). London: SAGE Publications.
15.
ClareL. (2003a). Managing threats to self: Awareness in the early stage Alzheimer's disease. Social Science and Medicine, 57, 1017–1029.
16.
ClareL. (2003b). ‘I'm still me’: Living with the onset of dementia. Journal of Dementia Care, March/April, 32–35.
17.
ClareL.RowlandsJ. M.QuinR. (2008). Collective strength: The impact of developing a shared social identity in early-stage dementia. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 7, 9–30.
18.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10, 37–46.
Department of Constitutional Affairs, Department of Health, Public Guardianship Office & Welsh Assembly Government. (2005). Mental capacity act 2005. London: Public Guardianship Office.
21.
Department of Health. (1999). National service framework for mental health. London: Crown Copyright.
22.
Department of Health. (2000). The NHS Plan. London: Crown Copyright.
23.
Department of Health. (2005). User and carer involvement in dementia care. London: Crown Copyright.
24.
Department of Health. (2009). Living well with dementia: A national dementia strategy. London: Crown Copyright.
25.
DewingJ. (2007). Participatory research: A method for process consent with persons who have dementia. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 6, 11–25.
26.
DitranoC. J.SilversteinL. B. (2006). Listening to parents’ voices: Participatory action research in schools. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 359–366.
27.
DorenlotP. (2005). Editorial: Applying the social model of disability to dementia: Present-day challenges. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 4, 459–461.
28.
ElliottR.FischerC. T.RennieD. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215–229.
29.
FerranJ.WilsonK.DoranM.GhadialiE.JohnsonF.CooperP. (1996). The early onset dementias: A study of clinical characteristics and service use. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11, 863–869.
30.
FineM.TorreM. E.BoudinK.BowenI.ClarkJ.HyltonD. (2003). Participatory action research: From within and beyond prison bars. In CamicP. M.RhodesJ. E.YardleyL. (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 173–198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31.
FraserN. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80.
32.
FreyneA.KiddN.CoenR.LawlorB. A. (1999). Burden in carers of dementia in patients: Higher levels in carers of younger sufferers. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 784–788.
33.
GilliardJ.MeansR.BeattieA.Daker-WhiteG. (2005). Dementia care in England and the social model of disability: Lessons and issues. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 4, 571–586.
34.
GoldsmithM. (1996). Communication is possible. In GoldsmithM. (Ed.), Hearing the voice of people with dementia: Opportunities and obstacles (pp. 47–63). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers Ltd.
35.
GreenbaumT. L. (1998). The handbook of focus group research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
36.
GussR.HawkinsJ.LoughS.AllenJ. (2006). Briefing paper no. 23: Services for younger people with dementia and the role of clinical psychology. Leicester: British Psychology Society.
37.
HowellD. C. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology, 5th edn. Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
38.
KilgourC.FlemingV. (2000). An action research inquiry into a health visitor parenting programme for parents of pre-school children with behaviour problems. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 682–688.
39.
KitwoodT. (1997). Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Buckingham: Open University Press.
40.
LachmanM. E. (2004). Development in midlife. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 305–331.
41.
LangtonS. A.EagleA.WarnerJ. (2007). Making sense of dementia in social world: A qualitative study. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 989–1000.
42.
LaxW.GalvinK. (2002). Reflections on a community action research project: Interprofessional issues and methodological problems. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 11, 376–386.
43.
LogsdonR. G. (2002). Making the most of everyday: Quality of life. In Braudy HarrisP. (Ed.), The person with Alzheimer's disease: Pathways to understanding the experience (pp. 75–87). Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
44.
MasonE.ClareL.PistrangN. (2005). Processes and experiences of mutual support in professionally-led support groups for people with early-stage dementia. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 4, 87–112.
45.
McGowinD. F. (1993). Living in the labyrinth: A personal journey through the maze of Alzheimer's disease. Cambridge: Mainsail Press.
46.
McMurtrayA.ClarkD. G.ChristineD.MendezM. F. (2006). Early-onset dementia: Frequency and causes compared to late-onset dementia. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 21, 59–64.
47.
McNiffJ.WhiteheadJ. (2006). All you need to know about action research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
48.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London: SAGE Publications.
49.
PhinneyA. (2002). Living with the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. In Braudy HarrisP. (Ed.), The person with Alzheimer's disease: Pathways to understanding the experience (pp. 49–74). Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
50.
PrattR.WilkinsonH. (2003). A psychosocial model of understanding the experience of receiving a diagnosis of dementia. Dementia: The international Journal of Social Research and Practice, 2, 181–199.
51.
ReedJ.CantleyC.ClarkeC.StanleyD. (2002). Services for younger people with dementia. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 1, 95–112.
52.
RoachP.KeadyJ. (2008). Younger people with dementia: time for fair play. British Journal of Nursing, 17, 690–690.
53.
RollandJ. S. (1999). Chronic illness and the family lifecycle. In CarterB.McGoldrickM. (Eds.), The expanded family life cycle: Individual, family and social perspectives, 3rd edn (pp. 492–511) London: Allyn & Bacon.
54.
SabatS. R. (2002). Epistemological issues in the study of insight in people with Alzheimer's disease. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 1, 279–293.
55.
ShepherdG.BoardmanJ.SladeM. (2007). Making recovery a reality. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.
SmithJ. A. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In SmithJ. A.HarréR.Van LangenhoveL. (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 9–26). London: SAGE Publications.
58.
SperlingerD.FurstM. (1994). The service experiences of people with presenile dementia: A study of carers in one London borough. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 9, 47–50.
59.
StringerE. T. (1996). Action research: A handbook for practitioners. London: SAGE Publications.
60.
SynderL. (1999). Speaking our minds: Personal reflections from individuals with Alzheimer's. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
61.
TeeS. R.LathleanJ. A. (2004). The ethics of conducting a co-operative inquiry with vulnerable people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 47, 536–543.
62.
WhitingS. (2002). Voices of younger people with dementia. PSIGE Newsletter, 81, 47–50.
63.
YaleR.SynderL. (2002). The experience of support groups for persons with early-stage Alzheimer's disease and their families. In Braudy HarrisP. (Ed.), The person with Alzheimer's disease: Pathways to understanding the experience (pp. 228–245). London: The John Hopkins University Press.
