This descriptive study examined the health care decision-making (HCDM) process of 20 community-dwelling care receivers (CR) with mild to moderate dementia and their family caregivers (CG). We conducted semi-structured interviews with the CR, focusing on their HCDM experiences. Additional data were obtained from the quantitative portion of the larger study. Major factors in the HCDM of the CRs were: symptoms, resources, function, trust in the health care system, and reliance on family. Poor congruence between CR and CG choices on treatment was analyzed in light of the qualitative findings. We found that older adults with mild to moderate dementia can participate in the HCDM process, make choices, and provide reasonable explanations for their choices. We concluded that disagreement on treatment choices in family dyads may be more fully explained by using a human needs-based model, as opposed to attributing care receivers’ choices to cognitive status alone.
Atchley, R. C. (1989). A continuity theory of normal aging. The Gerontologist, 29, 183-190.
2.
Baltes, M. M. (1996). The many faces of dependency in old age. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Callahan, D. (2002). A commentary - Putting autonomy in its place: Developing effective guidelines. The Gerontologist, 42(Special Issue III), 129-131.
4.
Colling, K. B. (2000). A taxonomy of passive behaviors in people with Alzheimer’s disease: Concept synthesis. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 32, 239-244.
5.
Downs, M. (1997). Progress report: The emergence of the person in dementia research. Ageing and Society, 17, 597-607.
6.
Drought, T. S., & Koenig, B. A. (2002). ‘Choice’ in end-of-life decision making: Researching fact or fiction? The Gerontologist, 42(Special Issue III), 114-128.
7.
Etchells, E., Darzins, P., Silberfeld, M., Singer, P. A., McKenney, J., Naglie, G., Katz, M., Guyatt, G. H., Molloy, D. W., & Strang, D. (1999). Assessment of patient capacity to consent to treatment. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 14, 27-34.
8.
Feinberg, L. F., & Whitlatch, C. J. (2001). Are persons with cognitive impairment able to state consistent choices? The Gerontologist, 41(3), 374-382.
9.
Fellows, L. K. (1998). Competency and consent in dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46, 922-926.
10.
Fitten, L. J., Lusky, R., & Hamann, C. (1990). Assessing treatment decision-making capacity in elderly nursing home residents. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 38, 1097-1104.
11.
Folstein, M., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
12.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
14.
Glass, K. C. (1997). Redefining definitions and devising instruments: Two decades of assessing mental competence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 20, 5-33.
15.
Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998). Assessing competence to consent to treatment: A guide for physicians and other health professionals. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
Hirschman, K. B., Joyce, C. M., James, B. D., Xie, S. X., & Karlawish, J. H. T. (2005). Do Alzheimer’s disease patients want to participate in a treatment decision, and would their caregivers let them? The Gerontologist, 45, 381-388.
17.
Marson, D. C., Annis, S. M., McInturff, B., Bartolucci, A. & Harrell, L. E. (1999). Error behaviors associated with loss of competency in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology, 53, 1983-1992.
18.
Marson, D. C., Ingram, K. K., Cody, H. A., & Harrell, L. E. (1995). Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer’s disease under different legal standards: A prototype instrument. Archives of Neurology, 52, 949-954.
19.
Marson, D. C., Schmitt, F., Ingram, K., & Harrell, L. (1994). Determining the competency of Alzheimer patients to consent to treatment and research. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 8(Suppl 4), 5-18.
20.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
21.
Mezey, M., Teresi, J., Ramsey, G., Mitty, E., & Bobrowitz, T. (2000). Decision-making capacity to execute a health care proxy: Development and testing of guidelines. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 48, 179-187.
22.
Moye, J., Karel, M. J., Azar, A. R., & Gurrera, R. J. (2004). Capacity to consent to treatment: Empirical comparison of three instruments in older adults with and without dementia. The Gerontologist, 44, 166-175.
23.
Nolan, M., Ryan, T., Enderby, P., & Reid, D. (2002). Towards a more inclusive vision of dementia care practice and research. Dementia, 1(2), 193-211.
24.
Sabat, S. R. (2002). Epistemological issues in the study of insight in people with Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia, 1(3), 279-293.
25.
Schmand, B., Gouwenberg, B., Smit, J. H., & Jonker, C. (1999). Assessment of mental competency in community-dwelling elderly. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 13(2), 80-87.
26.
Sugarman, J., McCrory, D. C., & Hubal, R. C. (1998). Getting meaningful informed consent from older adults: A structured literature review of empirical research. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 46, 517-524.
27.
Whitlatch, C. J. (2001). Including the person with dementia in family care-giving research. Aging and Mental Health, 5(Suppl 1), S20-S22.
28.
Wong, J. G., Clare, I. C. H., Gunn, M. J., & Holland, A. J. (1999). Capacity to make health care decisions: Its importance in clinical practice. Psychological Medicine, 29, 437-446.
