This article considers the application of functional data analysis methods to modelling particulate matter emission profiles from dynamometer experiments. In particular the functional convolution model is introduced as an extension of the distributed lag model to functional (smooth and continuous) observations. We present a penalized ordinary least squares estimator for the model and a novel bootstrap procedure to provide pointwise confidence regions for the estimated convolution functions. The model is illustrated on the Coordinating Research Council E55/59 study of diesel truck emissions.
AhnK, Rakha H, Trai A and M Aerde (2002) Estimating vehicle fuel consumption and emissions based on instataneous speed and acceleration levels. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 128, 189-90.
2.
AjtayDSolticP (2005) Towards accurate instantaneous emission models. Atmostpheric Environment, 39, 2443-49.
3.
CapielloAZeidM (2002) A statistical model of vehicle emissions in and fuel consumption. Technical report, Ford-MIT Alliance, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
4.
CarlsteinEDoK-AHallPHesterbergTKünschHR (1998) Matched-block bootstrap for dependent data. Bernoulli, 4, 305-28.
5.
ClarkNNGautamMWayneWSLyonsDWZielinskaB (2007) Heavy-duty vehicle chassis dynamometer testing for emissions inventory, air quality modeling, source apportionment and air toxics emissions inventory: E55/59 all phases. Technical Report E55/59, Coordinating Research Council.
6.
GenoveseC (2000) A bayesian time-course model for functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 691-703.
GreeneWH (2008) Econometric analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
9.
HallPHorowitzJLLingB-Y (1995) On blocking rules for the bootstrap with dependent data. Biometrika, 82(3), 561-74.
10.
HärdleWHorowitzJKreissJ-P (2003) Bootstrap methods for time series. International Statistical Review, 71, 435-59.
11.
HookerG (2013) On the identifiability of the functional convolution model. Technical Report BU-1681-M, Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University.
12.
HooverDRRiceJAWuCOYangLP (1998) Nonparametric smoothing estimates of time-varying coefficient models with longitudinal data. Biometrika, 85, 809–22.
13.
LadenFDockeryDW and LMNLM (2000) Association of fine particulate matter from different sources with daily mortality in six US cities. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108, 941–47.
14.
LahiriSN (2003) Resampling methods for dependent data. New York: Springer.
15.
MalfaitNRamsayJO (2003) The historical functional linear model. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 31, 115–28.
16.
McCreanorJNieuwen-huijsenMJ (2007) Respiratory effects of ex-posure to diesel traffic in persons with asthma. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 2348–58.
RamsayJOGravesS (2009) Functional data analysis with R and Matlab. New York: Springer.
19.
RamsayJOSilvermanBW (2005) Functional data analysis. New York: Springer.
20.
RiceJASilvermanBW (1991) Estimating the mean and covariance structure nonparametrically when the data are curves. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 53(1), 233–43.
21.
SchwartzJZanobettiA (2002) The concentration-response relation between pm 2.5 and daily deaths. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, 1025–29.
22.
ZhangCYuT (2008) Semiparametric detection of significant activation for brain fMRI. Annals of Statistics, 36, 1693–1725.
23.
ZhangCYuT (2007) A comparative study of one-level and two-level semiparametric estimation of hemodynamic response function for fMRI data. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 3845–61.
