The use of threshold values in order to diagnose individual subjects as being ‘susceptible’ or ‘infected or recovered/immune’ for a specific infection is virtually always prone to false positive, false negative or inconclusive classifications. Such misclassifications might lead to biased estimates for epidemiological parameters, such as the prevalence and the force of infection. In this article, we propose to estimate these epidemiological parameters directly from antibody titres, using an underlying mixture model. The method is applied to estimate the Salmonella serological prevalence in pigs and the age-dependent force of infection using serological data on the Varicella-Zoster virus (VZV) in humans. The threshold and direct method are compared through a simulation study.
BöhningDDietzESchlattmannP (1998) Recent developments in c.a.man (computer assisted analysis of mixtures). Biometrics, 54, 525–36.
4.
BollaertsKEilersPHCVan MechelenI (2006) Simple and multiple p-splines regression with shape constraints. Brit. J. of Math. and Stat. Psych., 59, 451–69.
5.
BollaertsKAertsMRibbensSBooneIVan der StedeYMintiensK (2008) Identification of Salmonella high risk pig-herds in belgium by using semiparametric quantile regression. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 171, 449–64.
Cortiñas AbrahantesJBollaertsKAertsMVan der StedeYOgunsanyaVMintiensK (2009) Salmonella serosurveillance: different statistical methods to categorize pig herds based on serological data. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 89, 59–66.
8.
DempsterAPLairdNMRubinDB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.
9.
DierckxP (1993) Curve and surface fitting with splines. Oxford: Clarendon.
10.
EilersPHCMarxB (1996) Flexible smoothing using b-splines and penalized likelihood (with comments and rejoinder). Statistical Science, 11, 89–121.
11.
GayNJ (1996) Analysis of serological surveys using mixture models: application to a survey of parvovirus B19. Statistics in Medicine, 15, 1567–73.
12.
GayNJVyseAJEnquselassieFNigatuWNokesDJ (2003) Improving sensitivity of oral fluid testing in IgG prevalence studies: application of mixture models to a rubella antibody survey. Epidemiology and Infection, 130258–91.
13.
GilksWRRichardsonSSpiegelhalterDJ (1996) Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. London: Chapman and Hall.
14.
HardelidPWilliamsDDezateuxCTookeyPAPeckhamCSCubittWDCortina-BorjaM (2008) Analysis of rubella antibody distribution from newborn dried blood spots using finite mixture models. Epidemiological Infection, 136, 1698–706.
15.
HastieTTibshiraniR (1990) Generalized additive models. New York: Chapman and Hall.
16.
MarxBEilersPHC (1998) Direct generalized additive modeling with penalized likelihood. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 28, 193–209.
17.
McCullaghPNelderJA (1989) Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman & Hall.
18.
MckayMDConoverWJBeckmanRJ (1979) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 21, 239–45.
19.
McLachlanGJPeelD (2000) Finite mixture models. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
20.
NardoneAMillerE (2004) Serological surveillance of rubella in Europe: European sero-epidemiology network (ESEN2). Euro-surveillance, 9, 5–7.
21.
RandlesRH (1982) On the asymptotic normality of statistics with estimated parameters. Annals of Statistics, 10, 462–74.
22.
RaoJNKWuCFJ (1988) Resampling inference with complex survey data. Journal of American Statistical Association, 83, 231–41.
23.
RoganWMJGladenB (1978) Estimating prevalence from the results of a screening test. American Journal of Epidemiology, 107, 71–76.
24.
SchlattmannP (2009) Medical applications of finite mixture models. Statistics for Biology and Health, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
25.
SilvermanBW (1986) Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.
26.
TitteringtonDMSmithAFMMakovUE (1985) Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions. New York: Wiley.
27.
Van derYStede BollaertsKCortiñas AbrahantesJImberechtsHMintiensK (2008) Identification of Salmonella risk farms by serological surveillance at pre-harvest level: mission impossible!?Proceedings of the fourth lustrum of the Dutch and Flemish society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
28.
VyseAJGayNJHeskethLMMorgan-CapnerPMillerE (2004) Seroprevalence of antibody to varicella zoster virus in England and Wales in children and young adults. Epidemiology and Infection, 132, 1129–34.
29.
VyseAJGayNJHeskethLMPebodyRMorgan-CapnerPMillerE (2006) Interpreting serological surveys using mixture models: the seroepidemiology of measles, mumps and rubella in England and Wales at the beginning of the 21st century. Epidemiology and Infection, 134, 1303–12.
30.
WiperMInsuaDRRuggeriF (2001) Mixtures of gamma distributions with applications. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 10, 440–54.
