In this paper we extend semiparametric mixed linear models with normal errors to elliptical errors in order to permit distributions with heavier and lighter tails than the normal ones. Penalized likelihood equations are applied to derive the maximum penalized likelihood estimates (MPLEs) which appear to be robust against outlying observations in the sense of the Mahalanobis distance. A reweighed iterative process based on the back-fitting method is proposed for the parameter estimation and the local influence curvatures are derived under some usual perturbation schemes to study the sensitivity of the MPLEs. Two motivating examples preliminarily analyzed under normal errors are reanalyzed considering some appropriate elliptical errors. The local influence approach is used to compare the sensitivity of the model estimates.
AkaikeH (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In PetrovBNCsàkiF (eds), International symposium on information theory, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 269–81.
2.
BeckmanRJNachtsheimCJCookRD (1987) Diagnostics for mixed-model analysis of variance. Technometrics, 29, 413–26.
3.
ChiEMReinselGC (1989) Models for longitudinal data with random effects and AR(1) errors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 452–59.
4.
CookRD (1986) Assessment of local influence (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 48, 133–69.
5.
DempsterAPLairdNMRubinDB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 39, 1–38.
6.
Díaz-GarcíaJAGaleaMLeivaV (2003) Influence diagnostics for elliptical multivariate linear regression models. Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods, 32, 625–41.
7.
EscobarLAMeekerWQ (1992) Assessing influence in regression analysis with censored data. Biometrics, 48, 507–28.
8.
FangKTKotzSNgKW (1990) Symmetric multivariate and related distribution. London: Chapman and Hall.
9.
FungWKZhuZYWeiBCHeX (2002) Influence diagnostics and outlier tests for semiparametric mixed models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 64, 565–79.
10.
GaleaMPaulaGABolfarineH (1997) Local influence in elliptical linear regression models. The Statistician, 46, 71–79.
11.
GourierouxCMonfordA (1995) Statistics and econometric models, Vols. 1 and 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
GreenPJ (1987) Penalized likelihood for general semi-parametric regression models. International Statistical Review, 55, 245–59.
13.
GreenPJSilvermanBW (1994) Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall.
14.
HeXZhuZYFungWK (2002) Estimation in a semiparametric model for longitudinal data with unspecified dependence structure. Biometrika, 89, 579–90.
15.
HeckmanN (1986) Spline smoothing in a partly linear model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 48, 244–48.
16.
Ibacache-PulgarGPaulaGA (2011) Local influence for Student-t partially linear models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 55, 1462–78.
17.
KimCParkBUKimW (2002) Influence diagnostics in semiparametric regression models. Statistics and Probability Letters, 60, 49–58.
18.
LairdNMWareJH (1982) Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics, 38, 963–74.
19.
LangeKLLittleRJATaylorJMG (1989) Robust statistical modelling using the t-distribution. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 881–96.
20.
LesaffreEVerbekeG (1998) Local influence in linear mixed models. Biometrics, 54, 570–82.
LiuS (2002) Local influence in multivariate elliptical linear regression models. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 354, 159–74.
23.
LucasA (1997) Robustness of the Student t based M-estimator. Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods, 26, 1165–82.
24.
OsorioFPaulaGAGaleaM (2007) Assessment of local influence in elliptical linear models with longitudinal structure. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 51, 4354–68.
25.
PanJXFangKT (2002) Growth curve models and statistical diagnostics. New York: Springer.
26.
PinheiroJCLiuCWuYN (2001) Efficient algorithms for robust estimation in linear mixed-effect models using the multivariate t distribution. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 10, 249–76.
27.
RigbyRAStasinopoulosDM (2005) Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. Applied Statistics, 54, 507–54.
28.
SavalliCPaulaGACysneirosFJA (2006) Assessment of variance components in elliptical linear mixed models. Statistical Modelling, 6, 59–76.
29.
SchwarzC (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–64.
30.
SegalMRBacchettiPJewellNP (1994) Variances for maximum penalized likelihood estimates obtained via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 56, 345–52.
31.
SilvermanBW (1985) Some aspects of the spline smoothing approach to non-parametric regression curve fitting. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 47, 1–52.
32.
SpeckmanP (1988) Kernel smoothing in partial linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 50, 413–36.
33.
StaudenmayerJLakeEEWandMP (2009) Robustness for general design mixed models using the t-distribution. Statistical Modelling, 9, 235–55.
34.
VerbekeGMolenberghsG (2000) Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York: Springer.
35.
WahbaG (1983) Bayesian confidence intervals for the cross-validated smoothing spline. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 45, 133–50.
36.
WangY (1998) Mixed effects smoothing spline analysis of variance. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 60, 159–74.
37.
WelshAHRichardsonAM (1997) Approaches of the Robust Estimation of Mixed Models, In MaddalaGSRaoCR (eds), Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 15, pp. 343–84. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
38.
ZegerSLDigglePJ (1994) Semiparametric models for longitudinal data with application to CD4 cell numbers in HIV seroconverters. Biometrics, 50, 689–99.
39.
ZerbeGO (1979) Randomization analysis of the completely randomized design extended to growth and response curves. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 215–21.
40.
ZhangDLinXRazJSowersM (1998) Semiparametric stochastic mixed models for longitudinal data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 710–19.
41.
ZhuZYHeXFungWK (2003) Local influence analysis for penalized Gaussian likelihood estimators in partially linear models. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 30, 767–80.
