Miscellany: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Mail and Facsimile as Survey Media on Response Rate,Speed and Quality

CHURCH A H (1993). Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: a meta analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 1, 62–79.

BRENNAN M (1992). The effect of a monetary incentive on mail survey response rates: new data. Journal of the Market Research Society, 34, 2, 173–77.

BRENNAN M , & HOEK J (1992). The behaviour of respondents, non-respondents, and refusers across mail surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 4, 530–35.

CONANT J S (1990). Mail survey facilitation techniques: an assessment and proposal regarding reporting practices. Journal of the Market Research Society, 32, 569–578.

DOWNS P E , & KERR JR (1986). Recent evidence on the relationship between anonymity and response variables for mail surveys. Journal of the Academy of Market Science, 14, 72–82.

FARIA A J ; DICKENSON JR , & FILIPIC TC (1990). The effect of telephone versus letter prenotification on mail survey response rate, speed, quality and cost. Journal of the Market Research Society, 32, 551–556.

FORD N M (1967). The advance letter in mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 15, 202–204.

GREENLEAF E A (1992). Improving rating scale measures by detecting and correcting bias components in some response styles. Journal of the Market Research Society, 29, 2, 176–88.

HARVEY L (1987). Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: a comprehensive literature review. Journal of the Market Research Society, 29, 341–353.

HOUSTON M J , & FORD NM (1876). Broading the scope of methodological research in mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 13, 397–403.

JAMES J M , & BOLSTEIN R (1992). Large monetary incentives and their effect on mail survey response rates. Journal of the Market Research Society, 56, 4, 442–53

JOBBER D ; MIRZA H , & WEE KH (1991). Incentive and response rates to cross-national business surveys: A logit model analysis. Journal of the Market Research Society, 22, 4, 711–21.

JOBBER D , & SAUNDER J (1993). A note on the applicability of the BruvoldCorner model of mail survey response rates to commercial populations. Journal of Business Research, 26, 3, 223–36.

McDANIEL S W , & RAO CP (1981). An investigation on respondent anonymity's effect on mailed questionnaire response rate and quality. Journal of the Market Research Society, 23, 150–160.

McKEE D O (1992). The effect of using a questionnaire identification code and message about non-response follow-up plans on mail survey response characteristics. Journal of the Market Research Society, 34, 2, April, 179–191.

MARTIN W S (1989). Cost and benefits of selected response inducement techniques in mail survey research. Journal of Business Research, 19, 67, 79.

MILLER D C (1970). Handbook of research design and social measurement. New York: David McKay Co.

PARASURAMAN A (1982). More on the prediction of mail survey response rates. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 261–268.

SCHLEGELMILCH B N , & DIAMANTOPOULOS A (1991). Prenotification and mail survey response rates: a quantitative integration of the literature. Journal of the Market Research Society, 33, 243–255.

SHAW R N , & LING F (1992). Follow-up in international tourism mail surveys. Journal of Travel Research, 31, 2, Fall, 49–51

SIMON J L (1978). Basic research methods in social science: the art of empirical investigation. 2nd ed, New York: Random House.

SUTTON R J , & ZEITS LL (1992). Multiple prior notifications, personalisation, and reminder surveys. Do they have an effect on survey response rates? Market Research: A Magazine of Management and Applications 4, 4, 14–21.

YU J , & COOPER H (1983). A quantitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaire. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 36–44.