Miscellany: Exploring the Effects of Postcard Prenotification on Industrial Firms’ Response to Mail Surveys

ALBAUM U , & STRANDSKOV J (1989). Participation in a mail survey of international marketers: effects of pre-contact and detailed project explanation. Journal of Global Marketing 2, 7–23.

CHILDERS T L , & SKINNER SJ (1919). Gaining respondent co-operation in mail surveys through prior commitment. Public Opinion Quarterly 43, 558–561.

CHILDERS T L ; PRIDE W M , & FERRELL OC (1980). A reassessment of the effects of appeals on response to mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 17, 365–370.

DUNCAN W J (1979). Mail questionnaires in survey research: a review of response inducement techniques. Journal of Management 5, 39–55.

FARIA A J ; DICKINSON J R , & FILIPIC T J (1990). The effect of telephone versus letter prenotification on mail survey response rate, speed, quality and cost. Journal of the Market Research Society 32, 551–568.

HINRICHS J R (1975). Factors related to survey response rates. Journal of Applied Psychology 60, 249–251.

HORNIK J (1982). Impact of pre-call request form and gender interaction on response to a mail survey. Journal of Marketing Research 14, 144–151.

JOBBER D (1986). Improving response rates in industrial snail surveys, Industrial Marketing Management 15, 183–195.

JOBBER D , & SANDERSON SM (1983). The effects of prior letter and coloured questionnaires on mail survey response rates. Journal of the Market Research Society 25, 339–349.

MURPHY P R ; DALENBERG D R , & DALEY JM (1990). Improving survey responses with postcards. Industrial Marketing Management 19, 349–355.

PRESSLEY MM , & DUNN MG (1985). A factor-interactive experimental investigation of inducing response to questionnaires mailed to commercial populations. 1985 AMA Educator's Proceedings Chicago: American Marketing Association, 356–361.