Drawing upon postcolonial and postcolonial feminist lenses, this study critically analyzes the discourses, evident in the popular press, that serve to construct identities associated with veil-wearing Muslim women. Through print and digital media articles from January 2009 to December 2011, we trace the discursive character of the veil-wearing Muslim woman through conversations before, during, and after Bill 94 was tabled by the Quebec government. Concerned not only with the Western construction of the “other,” we attempted to provide the space necessary to hear Muslim women. Considerable focus was placed on teasing out interviews with Muslim women or responses by Muslim women. Findings suggest that several contradictions exist in terms of Western constructions and how Muslim women in Canada construct their own identities. At the center of these contradictions lies the symbolism of the veil, representing oppression and submission to some and empowerment and resistance to others.
AhlHMarlowS (2012) Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism and entrepreneurship: advancing debate to escape a dead end?Organization19(5): 543–62.
2.
AhmedL (1992) Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate. London: Yale University Press.
3.
AhmedL (2005) The veil debate – again. In: Nouraie-SimoneF (ed) On Shifting Ground: Muslim Women in the Global Era. New York: The Feminist Press at the City University of New York, pp. 153–71.
4.
AllenK (2011) Niqab attacker sentenced; year of probation follows woman’s written apology. Toronto Star, 26 November, GT1.
5.
AlvessonMKärremanD (2000) Varieties of discourse on the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations53(9): 1125–49.
6.
AlviSHoodfarHMcDonoughS (eds) (2003) The Muslim Veil in North America: Issues and Debates. Toronto: Women’s Press.
7.
BlatchfordC (2011a) These young women are worth fighting for. National Post, 12November, A4.
BullockK (2007) Rethinking Muslim Women and the Veil. International Migration & Immigration . London: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
10.
CalasMSmircichLBourneK (2009) Extending the boundaries: reframing “entrepreneurship as social change” through feminist perspectives. Academy of Management Review34(3): 552–69.
11.
Canadian Press (2009) Muslim group seeks ban on face-covering clothes. The Spectator, 8 October, A08.
DreschelA (2010) Quebec’s veil law is unfair to Muslims. The Spectator, 26 March, A15.
14.
DubeM (2002) Postcoloniality, feminist space, and religion. In: DonaldsonLPui-LanK (eds) Postcolonialism, Feminism and Religious Discourse. New York: Routledge, pp. 100–120.
DyeK (2011) Holding our words against us: cooptation of the feminist discourse to perpetuate ethnic discrimination. In: Critical Management Studies Conference, Naples, Italy, July 12, 2011.
17.
El GuindiF (2003) Veiling resistance. In: LewisRMillsS (eds) Feminist Postcolonial Theory. New York: Routledge, pp. 586–609.
FaircloughN (1985) Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics9: 739–63.
20.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and text: linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse Society3: 193–217.
21.
FrenkelMShenhavY (2006) From binarism back to hybridity: a postcolonial reading of management and organization studies. Organization Studies27: 855–76.
22.
GilmoreM (2010) What should Canada do?Toronto Star, 18 December, IN3.
23.
GolnaraghiG (2015) Postcoloniality, diversity discourses and corporate Canada: a critical discourse analysis of corporate images of the ‘immigrant’ at work. Doctoral Thesis, Athabasca University, Canada.
24.
GolnaraghiGMillsAJ (2013) Unveiling the myth of the Muslim woman: a postcolonial critique. Equality, Diversity & Inclusion: An International Journal32(2): 157–72.
25.
HaddadY (2007) The post 9/11 hijab as icon. Sociology of Religion68(3): 253–67.
26.
HardingR (2006) Historical representations of aboriginal people in the Canadian news media. Discourse and Society17(2): 205–35.
27.
HenttonenELaPointeKPesonenSVanhalaS (2013) A stain on the white uniform – the discursive construction of nurses’ industrial action in the media. Gender, Work and Organization20(1): 56–70.
MackeyE (2002) The House of Difference: Cultural Politics and National Identity in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
36.
MacMasterNLewisT (1998) Orientalism from unveiling to hyperveiling. Journal of European Studies28: 1–2.
37.
MalikM (2009) My burka my choice. The Globe and Mail, 13 October, A18.
38.
MartinoWRezai-RashtiM (2008) The politics of veiling, gender and the Muslim subject: on the limits of possibilities of anti-racist education in the aftermath of September 11. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education29(3): 417–31.
39.
MazherF (2010) Where does it end?Waterloo Region Record, 7 April, A6.
40.
MohantyC (1984) Under Western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discources. Boundary 212(3): 333–58.
41.
MohantyC (1988) Under western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discources. Feminist Review30: 65–88.
42.
MonteiroL (2010a) Local Muslim women to hold talk on veil ban. Waterloo Region Record, 24 April, B4.
43.
MonteiroL (2010b) Muslim women seek to dispel misconceptions with local dialogue. Waterloo Region Record, 10 June, E2.
PatriquinMGillisC (2010) About face. McLean’s Magazine, 12 April, 20.
46.
PrasadA (1997) The colonizing consciousness and representations of the other: a postcolonial critique of the discourse of oil. In: PrasadPMillsAJElmesMPrasadA (eds) Managing the Organizational Melting Pot: Delimmas of Workplace Diversity. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc., pp. 285–311.
47.
PrasadA (2003) The gaze of the other: postcolonial theory and organizational analysis. In: PrasadA (ed) Postcolonial Theory and Organizational Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan/St Martin’s Press, pp. 3–43.
48.
PrasadA (2006) The jewel in the crown: postcolonial theory and workplace diversity. In: KonradAMPrasadPPringleJK (eds) Handbook of Workplace Diversity. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., pp. 121–144.
49.
PrasadP (2005) Crafting Qualitative Research: Working in Postpositivist Traditions. Armonk: ME Sharpe.
50.
PrasadP (2012) Unveiling Europe’s civilized face: gender relations, new immigrants and the discourse of the veil in the Scandinavian workplace. In: PrasadA (ed) Against the Grain: Advances in Postcolonial Organization Studies. Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press, pp 54–72.
51.
Rojas-LizanaI (2011) Justifying and condemning sexual discrimination in everyday discourse: letters to the editor in the Australian local press. Journal of Pragmatics43(2011): 663–76.
52.
SaidE (1978) Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
ShiraziFMishraS (2010) Young Muslim women on the face veil (niqab): a tool of resistance in Europe but rejected in the United States. International Journal of Cultural Studies13(1): 43–62.
55.
StewartCPittsMOsborneH (2011) Mediated intergroup conflict: the discursive construction of “illegal immigrants” in a regional U.S. newspaper. Journal of Language and Social Psychology30(1): 8–27.
56.
SyedJPioE (2010) Veiled diversity? Workplace experiences of Muslim women in Australia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management27(1): 115–37.
57.
SyedJÖzbilginM (2009) A relational framework for international transfer of diversity management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management20(12): 2435–53.
58.
van DijkTA (1993) Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society4(2): 249–83.
59.
van DijkTA (2008) Discourse & Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
60.
WoodhullW (2003) Unveiling Algeria. In: LewisRMillsS (eds) Feminist Postcolonia Theory. New York: Routledge, pp. 567–585.
61.
YegenogluM (2003) Veiled fantasies: cultural and sexual difference in the discourse of orientalism. In: LewisRMillsS (eds) Feminist Postcolonia Theory. New York: Routledge, pp. 542–566.
