This article examines the responses of subsidiaries in France and Germany to the performance appraisal system from their US parent company. In addition to existing research, we base our results on employee perception (and not human resources-specialist opinion) and analyse in detail cross-cultural differences with regards to the specific phases of a performance appraisal. Our results show that the taken-for-granted features of to the US-style performance evaluation process are not reflected in the same way in different cultural settings. Employee expectations in the French subsidiary focused strongly on the performance criteria and the evaluation process, whilst their German counterparts were more preoccupied by appraisal outcomes.
Alexandre-BaillyFFestingMJonczykC (2007) Choix et formation des dirigeants en France et en Allemagne. In: BournoisFDuval-HamelJRoussilonS. (eds) Comités Exécutifs. Paris: Groupe Eyrolles, pp. 245–50.
2.
BarmeyerC (2008) La GRH et les organisations face aux dynamiques culturelles. In: WaxinM-FBarmeyerC (eds) Gestion des Ressources Humaines Internationales. Rueil-Malmaison: Editions Liaisons, pp. 57–102.
3.
BourguignonA (2004) Performance management and management control: evaluated managers’ point of view. European Accounting Review13(4): 659–87.
4.
BourguignonAChiapelloE (2005) The role of criticism in the dynamics of performance evaluation systems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting16(6): 665–700.
5.
BrattonJGoldJ (2003) Human Resource Management: Theory and Practice. 3rdedPalgrave: Macmillan.
6.
BrewsterC (1995) Towards a European model of human resource management. Journal of International Business Studies26(1): 1–21.
7.
BrewsterC (2004) European perspectives on human resource management. Human Resource Management Review14: 365–82.
8.
BrewsterC (2007) Comparative HRM: European views and perspectives. International Journal of Human Resource Management18(5): 769–87.
9.
BrewsterCMayrhoferWMorleyM (2004) Human Resource Management in Europe. Evidence of Convergence?Oxford: Elsevier.
10.
BudhwarPSSparrowPR (2002) An integrative framework for understanding cross-national human resource management practices. Human Resource Management Review22: 377–403.
11.
ClausLBriscoeD (2009) Employee performance management across borders: a review of relevant academic literature. International Journal of Management Reviews11(2): 175–96.
12.
ClausLHandML (2009) Customization decisions regarding performance management systems of multinational companies: an empircal view of Eastern European firms. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management9(2): 237–58.
13.
DickmannM (2003) Implementing German HRM abroad: desired, feasible, successful?International Journal of Human Resource Management14(2): 265–82.
14.
D’IribarneP (1994) The honour principle in the bureaucratic phenomenon. Organization Studies15(1): 81–97.
15.
D’IribarneP (1996) The usefulness of an ethnographic approach to the international comparison of organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization26(4): 30–47.
16.
D’IribarneP (2007) L’origine singulière des direigeants français. In: BournoisFDuval-HamelJRoussilonS. (eds) Comités Exécutifs. Paris: Groupe Eyrolles, pp. 221–5.
17.
DowlingPFestingMEngleA (2008) International Human Resource Management. Managing People in a Multinational Context. London: Thompson.
18.
EisenhardtKM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review14(4): 532–550.
19.
FarndaleE (2010) What is really driving differences and similarities in HRM practices across national boundaries in Europe?European Journal of International Management4: 362–381.
20.
FestingMBarzantnyC (2008) A comparative approach to performance management in France and Germany: the impact of the European and the country-specific environment. European Journal of International Management2(2): 208–27.
21.
FestingMKnappertL (2014) Country-specific profiles of performance management in China, Germany, and the United States – an empirical test. Thunderbird International Business Review56(4): 331–51.
22.
FestingMKnappertLDowlingPJ. (2012) Global performance management in MNEs – conceptualization and profiles of country-specific characteristics in China, Germany, and the United States. Thunderbird International Business Review54(6): 825–43.
23.
FlickU (2000) Episodic interviewing. In: BauerM WGaskellG D (eds) Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. London: Sage, pp. 75–92.
24.
GestelandRR (2005) Cross-cultural business behavior. Negotiating, Selling, Sourcing and Managing Across Cultures. 4thed. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
25.
GuestGBunceAJohnsonL (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods18(1): 59–82.
26.
HallETHallRM (1990) Understanding Cultural Differences. London: Intercultural Press Inc.
27.
HofstedeG (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
28.
HofstedeG (1984) Cultural dimension in management and planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management1(2): 81–99.
29.
HouseRHangesPJJavidanM. (eds.) (2004) Culture, Leadership and Organizations. The Globe Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
30.
INSEE Première (2000) Investir dans la Formation Continue (Investing in Vocational Training). Première 697, February. Paris: Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE).
31.
LindholmN (2000) National culture and performance management in MNC subsidiaries. Studies of Management & Organization29(4): 45–66.
32.
LorenzEH (1992) Trust and the flexible firm: international comparisons. Industrial Relations3(3): 455–72.
33.
MeyerE (2014) Navigating the cultural minefield. Harvard Business Review92(5): 119–23.
34.
MeyerEGuptaS (2009) Leading Across Cultures at Michelin. Fontainebleau (France), Singapore: INSEAD.
35.
Marshan-PiekkariRWelchC (2004) Qualitative research methods in international business: the state of the art. In: Marshan-PiekkariRWelchC (Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research: Methods of International Business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 5–24.
36.
MauriceMSellierFSilvestreJJ (1984) Rules, contexts and actors observations based on a comparison between France and Germany. British Journal of Industrial Relations22(3): 346–63.
37.
MillimanJTaylorSCzaplewskiAJ (2002a) Cross-cultural performance feedback in multinational enterprises: opportunity for organizational learning. Human Resource Planning25(3): 29–43.
38.
MillimanJNasonSZhuC. (2002b) An exploratory assessment of the purposes of performance appraisals in North and central America and the Pacific rim. Human Resource Management41(1): 87–102.
39.
PudelkoM (2006) A comparison of HRM systems in the USA, Japan and Germany in their socio-economic context. Human Resource Management Journal16(2): 123–53.
40.
PudelkoMHarzingA-W (2008) The golden triangle for MNCs: standardization towards Headquarters practices, standardization towards global best practices and localization. Organizational Dynamics37(4): 394–404.
41.
PudelkoMHarzingA-W (2007) Country-of-origin, localization or dominance effect? An empirical investigation of HRM practices in foreign subsidiaries. Human Resource Management46(4): 535–59.
42.
PulakosED (2009) Performance Management: A New Approach for Driving Business Results. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
43.
SegallaMFischerLSandnerK (2000) Making cross-cultural research relevant to European corporate integration: old problem – new approach. European Management Journal18(1): 38–51.
44.
SegallaMRouziesDBessonM. (2006) A cross-national investigation of incentive sales compensation. International Journal of Research in Marketing23: 419–23.
45.
TempelAEdwardsTFernerA. (2006) Subsidiary responses to institutional duality: collective representation practices of US multinationals in Britain and Germany. Human Relations59(11): 1543–70.
46.
TichyNMFombrunCJDevannaMA (1982) Strategic human resource management. Sloan Management Review23(2): 47–61.
47.
TrompenaarsFHampden-TurnerC (2000) Riding the Waves of Culture.Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
48.
YinR (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
