Home-based telework is one of the arrangements organizations can introduce to facilitate a better balance between employees’ professional and private lives. This article focuses on the question of under what conditions managers grant a subordinate’s request to telework and what role national cultures play herein. By looking into managers’ willingness to delegate power and to trust home-based teleworkers we try to explain the slow adoption of home-based telework and the reported differences across Northern and Southern European countries. In doing so we will make use of Hofstede’s writings on national cultures and of the propositions made by the telework literature on how to mitigate the potential trust problem associated with distance working. The purpose of the article is to develop new hypotheses regarding factors that influence managerial decision-making concerning telework and how these interact with national cultures. To test the hypotheses, a cross-national vignette study is proposed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adami, L. (1999) ‘Autonomy, Control and the Virtual Worker’, in P. Jackson (ed.) Virtual Working: Social and Organisational Dynamics. New York: Routledge .
2.
Bailey, D.E. and Kurland, N.B. (2002) ‘A Review of Telework Research: Findings, New Directions, and Lessons for the Study of Modern Work’ , Journal of Organizational Behaviour23: 383-400 .
3.
Betz, F., Riegler, J. and Schwarz, I. (1999) Deployment of Telework in European Public Administrations. An Overview. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions .
4.
Cameron, K.S. and Quinn, E. (1999) Onderzoeken en veranderen van organisatiecultuur. Gebaseerd op het model van de concurrerende waarden. Schoonhoven: Academic Service .
5.
Commission of the European Communities (2001) Benchmarking Report Following-up the ‘Strategies for jobs in the Information Society’. Commission Staff Working Document. SEC (2001) 222.
6.
Daniels. K., Lamond, D.A. and Standen, P. (2000) Managing Telework. Perspectives from Human Resource Management and Work Psychology. London: Thomson Learning .
7.
den Dulk, L. (2001) Work-Family Arrangements in Organisations. A Cross-national Study in the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom and Sweden. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers .
8.
Depickere, A. (1999) ‘Managing Virtual Working. Between Commitment and Control?’, in P. Jackson (ed.) Virtual Working: Social and Organisational Dynamics. London: Routledge .
9.
European Commission (2000) E-work 2000. Status Report 2000 on New Ways to Work in the Information Society. Brussels: European Commission , http://www.eto.org.uk
10.
Gareis, K. (2002) ‘The Intensity of Telework in 2002 in the EU, Switzerland and the US’ , paper presented at the International Congress New Work 2002 ‘Sustainability in the new economy: Designing a new work space. Sustainability and ethical dimensions’, 3-5 September 2002, Badajoz, Spain. Updated version May 2003, www.sibis-eu.org
11.
Gottlieb, B.H., Kelloway, E.K. and Barham, E.J. (1998) Flexible Work Arrangements. Managing the Work-Family Boundary. Wiley Series in Work, Well Being and Stress. Chichester: John Wiley .
12.
Hales, C. (1993) Managing through Organisation. The Management Process, Forms of Organisation and the Work of Managers. London: Routledge .
13.
Handy, C. (1995) ‘Trust and the Virtual Organization: How Do You Manage People whom You Do Not See?’ , in Harvard Business Review (May-June): 40-50 .
14.
Harrington, S.J. and Ruppel, C.P. (1999) ‘Telecommuting: A Test of Trust, Competing Values, and Relative Advantage’ , IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication42: 163-173 .
15.
Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s Consequences. Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
16.
Huws, U., Korte, W.B. and Robinson, J. (1990) Telework. Towards the Elusive Office. Chichester: John Wiley .
17.
Klidas, A.K. (2001) Employee Empowerment in the European Hotel Industry: Meaning, Process and Cultural Relativity. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers .
18.
Klidas, A.K. (2002) ‘The Cultural Relativity of Employee Empowerment: Findings from the European Hotel Industry’ , paper presented at the EuroCHRIE International Conference on Cross Cultural Challenges in the Tourism Industry: The Educational Answers, 31 October-2 November 2002, Barcelona, Spain.
19.
Lamond, D. (2000) ‘Organizational Structures that Support Telework’, in K. Daniels, D.A. Lamond and P. Standen (eds) Managing Telework. Perspectives from Human Resource Management and Work Psychology. London: Thomas Learning .
20.
Leeds, B.S. and Leeds, O.D. (2002) ‘Trusting Teleworkers’ , paper presented at the International Congress New Work 2002 ‘Sustainability in the new economy: Designing a new work space. Sustainability and ethical dimensions’, 3-5 September 2002, Badajoz, Spain.
21.
Nilles, J. (1998) Managing Telework: Strategies for Managing the Virtual Workforce. New York: John Wiley & Sons .
22.
Omari, M. and Standen, P. (2000) ‘Selection for Telework’, in K. Daniels, D.A. Lamond and P. Standen (eds) Managing Telework. Perspectives from Human Resource Management and Work Psychology. London: Thomas Learning .
23.
Peters, P., Tijdens, K. and Wetzels, C. (forthcoming) ‘Employees’ Opportunities, Preferences and Practices in Telecommuting Adoption’ , Journal of Information and Management.
24.
Peters, P., Wetzels, C. and Tijdens, K. (2002) ‘Telework, Time Saving or Timegreedy?’ , paper presented at the International Congress New Work 2002 ‘Sustainability in the new economy: Designing a new work space. Sustainability and ethical dimensions’, 3-5 September 2002, Badajoz, Spain.
25.
Poelmans, S., Chinchilla, N. and Cardona, P. (2003) ‘Family-friendly HRM Policies and the Employment Relationship’ , International Journal of Manpower24(3): 128-147 .
26.
Powell, G.N. and Mainiero, L.A. (1999) ‘Managerial Decision Making Regarding Alternative Work Arrangements’ , Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology72: 41-56 .
27.
Sparrow, P. (2000) ‘Teleworking and the Psychological Contract: A New Division of Labour?’, in K. Daniels, D.A. Lamond and P. Standen (eds) Managing Telework. Perspectives from Human Resource Management and Work Psychology. London: Thomas Learning .
28.
Sparrow, P.S. and Daniels, K. (1999) ‘Human Resource Management and the Virtual Organization: Mapping the Future Research Issues’ , Journal of Organizational Behaviour20: 45-62 .
29.
Standen, P. (2000) ‘Organizational Culture and Telework’, in K. Daniels, D.A. Lamond and P. Standen (eds) Managing Telework. Perspectives from Human Resource Management and Work Psychology. London: Thomas Learning .
30.
Suomi, R. and Pekkola, J. (1999) ‘Management Rationalities and Virtual Working. Adjusting Telework to Different Organisational Cultures and Rationalities’, in P. Jackson (ed.) Virtual Working: Social and Organisational Dynamics. London: Routledge .
31.
Tregaskis, O. (2000) ‘Telework in its National Context’, in K. Daniels, D.A. Lamond and P. Standen (eds) Managing Telework. Perspectives from Human Resource Management and Work Psychology. London: Thomas Learning .
32.
van der Wielen, J. and Taillieu, L. (1994) ‘Recent Conceptual Developments in Telework Research , paper presented at Telecommute ’94, 25-27 October, San Francisco, USA.
33.
van Klaveren, M., Tijdens, K., Peters, P. and Wetzels, C. (forthcoming) ‘Developments in Teleworking’, in B. Peper, J. van Doorne-Huiskes and L. den Dulk (eds) Flexible Working and Organizational Change: The Integration of Work and Personal Life. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar .
34.
van Ommeren, J. (2000) ‘Performance Management and Compensation’, in K. Daniels, D.A. Lamond and P. Standen (eds) Managing Telework. Perspectives from Human Resource Management and Work Psychology. London: Thomas Learning .
35.
Williamson, O.E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press .
