Zoning severely limits what individuals can do with their private property. There is also empirical evidence that zoning contributes to the housing affordability crisis. There are good reasons to be skeptical of zoning, yet it is ubiquitous. What (if anything) can justify this widespread yet dubious practice? I critically examine one argument in this paper. The argument says zoning is justified because it facilitates autonomy. After a charitable reconstruction of the argument, I present what I think is a decisive objection to it. While the autonomy defense of zoning ultimately fails, the analysis provides insight into a related topic: gentrification. Many articulate what's wrong with gentrification by arguing that it inhibits autonomy. Reflections on zoning and autonomy show that this claim must be curtailed and common remedies to the problem of gentrification reconsidered.
DiamondRMcQuadeTQianF (2019) The effects of rent controls on tenants, landlords, and inequality: Evidence from San Francisco.American Economic Review109: 3365–3394.
10.
DraperJ (2022) Gentrification and everyday democracy.European Journal of Political Theory (Online First).
GrayMN (2022) Arbitrary Lines: How Zoning Broke the American City. Washington, DC: Island Press.
25.
GuilleryD (2023) Separating the wrong of settlement from the right to exclude: territory and sociocultural stability.Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy25: 346–375.
26.
GyourkoJ (2009) Housing supply.Annual Review of Economics1: 295–318.
27.
HallidayDMeyerM (2024) Justice and housing.Philosophy Compass19: e12966.
28.
HarneyB (2009) The economics of exclusionary zoning and affordable housing.Stetson Law Review38: 459–490.
29.
HirtSA (2014) Zoned in the USA: The Origins and Implications of American Land-Use Regulation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
30.
HooverJ (2023) The injustice of gentrification.Political Theory5: 925–954.
31.
HuberJWolkensteinF (2018) Gentrification and occupancy rights.Politics, Philosophy & Economics17: 378–397.
32.
HuemerM (2010) Is there a right to immigrate?Social Theory and Practice36: 429–461.
KholodilinKA (2024) Rent control effects through the lens of empirical research: an almost complete review of the literature.Journal of Housing Economics63: 101983.
40.
KogelmannB (2021) Secret Government: The Pathologies of Publicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KogelmannBCarrollJ (2024) The ethics of AI automation: the importance of treating like cases alike.AI and Ethics.
43.
KrishnamurthyMMooreM (2024) What makes gentrification wrong? A place-based account.Journal of Moral Philosophy.
44.
LewynM (2017) Does the threat of gentrification justify restrictive zoning?Real Estate Law Journal46: 447–461.
45.
LovettAZuehlJ (2002) The possibility of democratic autonomy.Philosophy & Public Affairs50: 467–498.
46.
ManginJ (2014) The new exclusionary zoning.Stanford Law & Policy Review25: 91–120.
47.
MankiwGN (2015) Principles of Microeconomics (7th Ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
48.
MarbleWNallC (2021) Where self-interest trumps ideology: liberal homeowners and local opposition to housing development.Journal of Politics83: 1747–1763.
49.
MetcalfG (2018) Sand castles before the tide? Affordable housing in expensive cities.Journal of Economic Perspectives32: 59–80.
50.
MillJS (1978) On Liberty, edited by Elizabeth Rapaport. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
51.
MunchJRSvarerM (2002) Rent control and tenancy duration.Journal of Urban Economics52: 542–560.
52.
PutnamD (2021) Gentrification and domination.Journal of Political Philosophy29: 167–187.
53.
QuigleyT (2023) NIMBYism and legitimate expectations.Journal of Applied Philosophy40: 708–724.
54.
RawlsJ (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
55.
RawlsJ (2005) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
56.
RazJ (1986) The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
RichardsonHS (2002) Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning about the Ends of Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SciubbaJD (2022) 8 Billion and Counting: How Sex, Death, and Migration Shape Our World. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
60.
SerkinC (2020) A case for zoning.Notre Dame Law Review96: 749–798.
61.
SerkinC (2022) A liberal theory of zoning.Jurisprudence13: 649–659.
62.
SidgwickH (1981) The Methods of Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
63.
SieganBH (2020) Land Use without Zoning. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
64.
SimmonsAJ (2010) Ideal and Nonideal Theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs38: 5–36.
65.
SmithA (1981) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Vol. 1. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
66.
SominI (2020) Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67.
SteeleEH (1986) Participation and rules—the functions of zoning.American Bar Foundation Research Journal11: 709–755.
68.
StilzA (2013) Occupancy rights and the wrong of removal.Philosophy & Public Affairs41: 324–356.
69.
StringhamEPMillerJKClarkJR (2010) Internalizing externalities through private zoning.Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy40: 96–103.
70.
SundstromRR (2024) Just Shelter: Gentrification, Integration, Race, and Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71.
SwaineL (2020) Ethical Autonomy: The Rise of Self-Rule. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72.
TaylorMZ (2016) The Politics of Innovation: Why Some Countries are Better than Others at Science and Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73.
TrounstineJ (2023) You won’t be my neighbor: opposition to high density development.Urban Affairs Review59: 294–308.
74.
VanGilderM (2024) The good, the bad, and the gentrified: how the historical misuse and future potential of zoning laws impacts urban development.University of Cincinnati Law Review92: 1258–1286.
75.
WallS (1998) Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76.
WilsonJL (2021) An autonomy-based argument for democracy. In: SobelDVallentynePWallS (eds) In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, Vol. 7. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 194–226.
