What, if anything, is problematic about gentrification? This article addresses this question from the perspective of normative political theory. We argue that gentrification is problematic insofar as it involves a violation of city-dwellers’ occupancy rights. We distinguish these rights from other forms of territorial rights and discuss the different implications of the argument for urban governance. If we agree on the ultimate importance of being able to pursue one’s located life plans, the argument goes, we must also agree on limiting the impact of gentrification on peoples’ lives. Limiting gentrification’s impact, however, does not entail halting processes of gentrification once and for all.
AndersonE (1999) What is the point of equality. Ethics109(1): 287–337.
2.
AndersonE (2010) The Imperative of Integration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
AtkinsonRBridgeG (2005) Introduction. In: AtkinsonRBridgeG (eds) Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–17.
4.
BaiocchiG (2005) Militants and Citizens. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
BaiocchiGGanuzaE (2013) Participatory budgeting as if emancipation mattered. Politics and Society42 (1): 20–50.
6.
BrennerNTheodoreN (2002) Cities and the geographies of actually existing neoliberalism. Antipode: A Radical Journal of Geography34(3): 349–379.
7.
CohenGA (1989) On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics99(4): 906–944.
de MorrisAALeistnerP (2009) From neighborhood association system to participatory democracy: broadening and deepening public involvement in Portland, Oregon. National Civic Review (Summer 2009): 47–55.
10.
DworkinR (2000) Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 11–119.
11.
EhrenhaltA (2012) The Great Inversion and the Future of the American City. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
12.
EllenIGO’FlahertyB (2013) How New York and Los Angeles housing policies are different – and maybe why. In: HalleDBeveridgeAA (eds) New York and Los Angeles: The Uncertain Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 286–309.
13.
FreemanLBraconiF (2007) Gentrification and displacement. New York city in the 1990s. Journal of the American Planning Association70(1): 39–52.
14.
FungA (2003) Recipes for public spheres: eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy11(3): 338–367.
15.
FungA (2006) Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review66(December): 66–75.
GibsonDW (2015) The Edge Becomes the Center: An Oral History of Gentrification in the Twenty-First Century. New York, NY: Overlook Press.
18.
HamnetC (1984) Gentrification and residential location theory: a review and assessment. In: HerbertDTJohnstonRJ (eds) Geography and Urban Environment: Progress in Research and Application, Vol. 6. London: Wiley & Sons, pp. 283–319.
19.
HamnetCWhiteleggD (2006) Loft conversion and gentrification in London: from industrial to postindustrial land use. Environment and Planning39 (1): 106–124.
20.
HarveyD (2008) The right to the city. New Left Review53(September/October): 23–40.
21.
HohfeldWH (1919) Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, and Other Essays. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
JuppE (2013) ‘I feel more at home here than in my own community’: approaching the emotional geographies of neighborhood policy. Critical Social Policy33(3): 532–553.
23.
KohnM (2016) The Death and Life of the Urban Commonwealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
LefebvreH (2003) The Urban Revolution. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.
25.
LeitnerHSheppardESSziartoK. (2006) Contesting urban futures: decentering neoliberalism. In: LeitnerHPeckJSheppardES (eds) Contesting Neoliberalism: Urban Frontiers. New York, NY: Guilford Press, pp. 1–25.
26.
MillerD (1995) On Nationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
27.
MillerD (2012) Territorial rights: concept and justification. Political Studies60(2): 252–268
28.
MillerD (2016) Strangers in our Midst. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
MillerD (2016) Majorities and minarets: religious freedom and public space. British Journal of Political Science46(2): 437–456.
30.
MooreM (2015) A Political Theory of Territory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ShelbyT (2014) Integration, inequality and imperatives of justice: a review essay. Philosophy and Public Affairs42(3): 253–285.
38.
SmithNWilliamsP (1986) Alternatives to orthodoxy: invitation to a debate. In: SmithNWilliamsP (eds) Gentrification of the City. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin, pp. 1–13.
39.
StilzA (2011) Nations, states, and territory. Ethics121 (3): 572–601.
40.
StilzA (2013) Occupancy rights and the wrong of removal. Philosophy and Public Affairs41(4): 324–356.
41.
StilzA (2014) Territorial rights and national defence. In: FabreCLazarS (eds) The Morality of Defense War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 203–228.
42.
VigdorJ (2002) Does gentrification harm the poor?Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs (2002): 133–173.
43.
WalzerM (1983) Spheres of Justice. New York, NY: Basic Books.
44.
WalzerM (2003) Politics and Passion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45.
WilliamsonT (2010) Sprawl, Justice, and Citizenship: The Civic Costs of the American Way of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
YglesiasM (2012) The Rent Is Too Damn High. What To Do About It, And Why It Matters More Than You Think. New York NY: Simon & Schuster.
47.
ZukMBierbaumAHChappleK. (2015) Gentrification, displacement and the role of public investment: a literature review. Community development investment center working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
