The doctrine of permanent sovereignty over natural resources is a hugely consequential one in the contemporary world, appearing to grant nation-states both jurisdiction-type rights and rights of ownership over the resources to be found in their territories. But the normative justification for that doctrine is far from clear. This article elucidates the best arguments that might be made for permanent sovereignty, including claims from national improvement of or attachment to resources, as well as functionalist claims linking resource rights to key state functions. But it also shows that these defences are insufficient to justify permanent sovereignty and that in many cases they actually count against it as a practice. They turn out to be compatible, furthermore, with the dispersal of resource rights away from the nation-state which global justice appears to demand.
AnayaSJWilliamsR (2001) ‘The Protection of Indigenous Peoples’ Rights over Land and Natural Resources in the Inter-American Human Rights System,’Harvard Human Rights Journal14 (2001): 33–86.
3.
AngellK (2013) Do insecure property rights ground rights of jurisdiction?Res Publica19(2): 183–192.
4.
ArmstrongC (2010) National self-determination, global equality and moral arbitrariness. Journal of Political Philosophy18(3): 313–334.
5.
ArmstrongC (2013a) Resources, rights and global justice: a response to Kolers. Political Studies62(1): 216–222.
6.
ArmstrongC (2013b) Sovereign wealth funds and global justice. Ethics and International Affairs27(4): 413–428.
7.
ArmstrongC (2014a) Justice and attachment to natural resources. Journal of Political Philosophy22(1): 48–65.
8.
ArmstrongC (2014b) Justice and Natural Resources: A Global Egalitarian Theory (monograph under contract withOxford University Press).
9.
Ciriacy-WantrupSVBishopR (1975) “Common property” as a concept in natural resources policy. Natural Resources Journal15(4): 713–728.
10.
ColePWellmanCH (2011) Debating the Ethics of Immigration: Is There a Right to Exclude?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
CornesRSandlerT (1996) The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
FalkenmarkMLundqvistJ (1998) Towards water security: political determination and human adaptation crucial. Natural Resources Forum21(1): 37–51.
13.
GleickP (1998) Water in crisis: paths to sustainable water use. Ecological Applications8(3): 571–579.
14.
HarrisJW (1996) Property and Justice.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.27–28.
15.
HoekstraAChapagainA (2009) The Globalization of Water. Oxford: Blackwell, chapter3.
16.
HonoréT (1987) Ownership. In: Making Law Bind. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp.161–192.
17.
KliotNShmueliDShamirU (2001) Institutions for management of transboundary water resources: their nature, characteristics and shortcomings. Water Policy3: 229–255.
18.
KolersA (2009) Land, Conflict and Justice.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
KorsmoF (1988) Nordic security and the Saami minority: territorial rights in Northern Fennoscandia. Human Rights Quarterly10: 509–524.
20.
LevyJ (2008) National and statist responsibility. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy11(4): 485–499.
21.
MargalitARazJ (1990) National self-determination. Journal of Philosophy87(9): 439–461.
22.
McCormickJ (2001) Environmental Policy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, chapter9.
23.
McIntyreO (2007) Environmental Protection of International Watercourses under International Law. Aldershot: Ashgate.
24.
MeiselsT (2003) Liberal nationalism and territorial rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy20(1): 31–43.
25.
MillerD (1995) On Nationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, p. 106, Note 34.
26.
MillerD (2007) National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
MillerD (2012) Territorial rights: concept and justification. Political Studies60(2): 252–268.
28.
MooreM (1998) National Self-Determination and Secession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
MooreM (2012) Natural resources, territorial rights and global distributive justice. Political Theory40(1): 84–107.
30.
MorrisetteP (1989) The evolution of policy responses to stratospheric ozone depletion. Natural Resources Journal29(3): 793–821.
31.
NineC (2008) The moral arbitrariness of state borders: against Beitz. Contemporary Political Theory7: 259–279.
32.
NineC (2012) Global Justice and Territory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 41.
33.
OstromE (2000) Private and common property rights. In: BouckaertBDe GeestG (eds), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Volume II. Civil Law and Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp.332–379.
34.
OstromE (2003) How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. Journal of Theoretical Politics15(3): 239–270.
35.
PalmerARobbC (eds) (2004) International Environmental Law Reports Volume 4: International Environmental Law in National Courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
PettersonP (2006) Out Stealing Horses, translated byAnneBorn. London: Vintage, p.40.
37.
PoggeT (2002) World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 178–181.
38.
PooreD (2003) Changing Landscapes: The Development of the International Tropical Timber Organization and its Influence on Tropical Forest Management. London: Earthscan.
39.
RawlsJ (1999) The Law of Peoples and ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1999.
40.
Reus-SmitC (2001) Human rights and the social construction of sovereignty. Review of International Studies27(4): 519–538.
41.
RisseM (2012) On Global Justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
RobbC (ed.) (1999) International Environmental Law Reports 1: Early Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
SchrijverN (1997) Sovereignty over Natural Resources: Balancing Rights and Responsibilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
SchrijverN (2008) Unravelling state sovereignty? The controversy on the right of indigenous peoples to permanent sovereignty over their natural wealth and resources. In: BoerefijnIGoldschmidtJ (eds), Changing Perceptions of Sovereignty and Human Rights. Antwerp: Intersentia, pp. 85–98.
45.
SimmonsAJ (2012) ‘States’ resource rights: locating the limits. In: Online Symposium on Resource Rights. Available at: http://territorynetwork.wordpress.com/.
46.
SlaughterA-M (2004) A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
SmithRJ (1981) Resolving the tragedy of the commons by creating private property rights in wildlife. CATO Journal1: 439–468.
48.
StilzA (2011) Nations, states and territory. Ethics121: 572–601.
49.
SymeGJNancarrowBEMcCreddinJA (1999) Defining the components of fairness in the allocation of water to environmental and human uses. Journal of Environmental Management57(1): 51–70.
50.
VigNFaureM (eds) (2004) Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and European Union. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51.
WellmanCH (2012) ‘Political legitimacy and territorial rights. Presented at the Workshop on the Theories of Territory beyond Westphalia.
