Exploitation is interacting with another in a way that takes unfair advantage of that person. Exploitation is thought to be morally wrong even when it would bring about the best attainable outcome, hence conflicts with the consequentialist morality that holds one ought always to do whatever would bring about the best outcome. This essay aims to reconcile norms against exploitation and act consequentialism. A puzzle about exploitation is raised and resolved.
ParfitD (1984) ‘What makes someone’s life go best?’. In Parfit D, Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.493–502.
9.
ParfitD (2000) Equality or priority? Reprinted in: ClaytonAWilliamsA (eds) The Ideal of Equality. New York: Macmillan and St. Martin’s Press, pp.81–125.
10.
PoggeT (2008) Testing our drugs on the poor abroad. In: EmmanuelEHawkinsJ (eds) Exploitation and Developing Countries: The Ethics of Clinical Research. Oxford and Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp.105–141.
11.
QuinnW (1993) Actions, intentions, and consequences: The doctrine of double effect. Reprinted in his collection: Morality and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.175–193.
12.
RailtonP (1984) Alienation, consequentialism, and the demands of morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs13(2): 134–171.
13.
RossWD (1988 [1930]) The Right and the Good. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Co.
14.
Schmidtz D (2006) The Elements of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
SidgwickH (1907 [1874]) The Methods of Ethics. 7th edn. London: Macmillan.
16.
Van DonselaarG (2009) The Right to Exploit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
Van ParijsP (1995) Real Freedom for All: What (if Anything) Can Justify Capitalism?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
WertheimerA (1996) Exploitation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
WhiteS (2003) The Civic Minimum: On the Rights and Obligations of Economic Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
WoodA (1995) Exploitation. Social Philosophy and Policy12(2): 136–158.
