Abstract
Theories of political legitimacy normally stipulate certain conditions of legitimacy: the features a state must possess in order to be legitimate. Yet there is obviously a second question as to the value of legitimacy: the normative features a state has by virtue of it being legitimate (such as it being owed obedience, having a right to use coercion, or enjoying a general justification in the use of force). I argue that it is difficult to demonstrate that affording these to legitimate states is morally desirable, and that obvious alternative conceptions of the value of legitimacy (notably epistemic and instrumental) are not without problems of their own. The intuitive triviality of establishing the value of normative legitimacy may mask a serious problem.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baker
K
(1976 ) Condorcet: Selected Writings . Indianapolis : Bobbs-Merill .
2.
Brettschneider
C
(2007 ) The rights of the guilty: Punishment and political legitimacy . Political Theory
35 : 175 – 99 .
3.
Christiano
T
(2008 ) The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and its Limits . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
4.
Christiano
T
(2009 ) Debate: Estlund on democratic authority . Journal of Political Philosophy
17 : 228 – 40 .
5.
Cohen
J
(1986 ) An epistemic conception of democracy . Ethics
97 : 26 – 38 .
6.
Estlund
D
(2008 ) Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework . Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
7.
Estlund
D
(2009 ) Debate: On Christiano’s The Constitution of Equality . Journal of Political Philosophy
17 : 241 – 52 .
8.
Gelman
A
(2008 ) Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do . Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
9.
Gilbert
M
(2006 ) A Theory of Political Obligation: Membership, Commitment, and the Bonds of Society . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
10.
Green
L
(1989 ) The Authority of the State . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
11.
Grofman
B
Owen
G
Feld
S
(1983 ) Thirteen theorems in search of the truth . Theory and Decision
15 : 261 – 78 .
12.
Hardin
R
(1991 ) Hobbesian political order . Political Theory
19 : 156 – 80 .
13.
Hobbes
T
(1994 ) Leviathan ,
Curley
E
(ed.). Indianapolis : Hackett .
14.
Hume
D
(1985 ) Of the original contract . In:
Miller
EF
(ed.) David Hume: Essays Moral, Political and Literary . Indianapolis : Liberty Classics .
15.
List
C
Goodin
R
(2001 ) Epistemic democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet jury theorem . Journal of Political Philosophy
9 (3 ): 277 – 306 .
16.
Locke
J
(1988 ) Two Treatise of Government ,
Laslett
P
(ed.). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
17.
Manin
B
(1997 ) The Principles of Representative Government . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
18.
Nozick
R
(1974 ) Anarchy, State, and Utopia . New York : Basic Books .
19.
Peter
F
(2007 ) Democratic legitimacy and proceduralist social epistemology . Politics, Philosophy and Economics
6 : 329 – 53 .
20.
Rawls
J
(1955 ) Two concepts of rules . The Philosophical Review
64 : 3 – 32 .
21.
Rawls
J
(1993 ) Political Liberalism . New York : Columbia University Press .
22.
Raz
J
(1986 ) The Morality of Freedom . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
23.
Rousseau
J-J
(1988 ) On The Social Contract ,
Cress
D
(ed.). Indianapolis : Hackett .
24.
Scheffler
S
(1994 ) The Rejection of Consequentialism . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
25.
Senor
T
(1987 ) What if there are no political obligations? A reply to A.J. Simmons . Philosophy and Public Affairs
16 : 260 – 8 .
26.
Simmons
AJ
(1979 ) Moral Principles and Political Obligations . Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
27.
Simmons
AJ
(1999 ) Justification and legitimacy . Ethics
109 : 739 – 71 .
28.
Simmons
AJ
(2001 ) Justification and Legitimacy: Essays on Rights and Obligations . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
29.
Simmons
AJ
(2010 ) Ideal and non-ideal theory . Philosophy and Public Affairs
38 : 5 – 36 .
30.
Van Parijs
P
(1996 ) Is democracy compatible with justice?Journal of Political Philosophy
4 : 101 – 17 .
31.
Waldron
J
(1981 ) A right to do wrong . Ethics
92 : 21 – 39 .
32.
Wolff
RP
(1970 ) In Defense of Anarchism . New York : Harper and Row .