The “Esperanto” of business... or how to be successful in life: A decolonial reading,using semiotics,of English language courses’ advertisements in Brazil
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2022
The “Esperanto” of business... or how to be successful in life: A decolonial reading,using semiotics,of English language courses’ advertisements in Brazil
The present paper seeks to analyze, based on the decolonial perspective, how the epistemic and ontological elements of the coloniality of power that operates through the linguistic imperialism of English are made present in the hierarchies of knowledge in marketing. For this, we use the generative trajectory, a semiotic theoretical model of meaning, to analyze advertisements of a transnational online English language company operating in Brazil, which reinforces in its communications the importance of learning English as the only way to succeed in the business world and to overcome the backwardness of local culture and language. The semiotic analysis helped to analyze the manipulation path and strategies and the concretization of the narratives present in the communication made through the ads, unveiling epistemic and ontological elements that make up the coloniality of power and its association to English, which was, in turn, related to the hierarchies of knowledge in marketing.
AlcadipaniR (2017) Periódicos brasileiros em inglês: a mímica do publish or perish “global”. Revista de Administração de Empresas57(4): 405–411.
2.
AlcadipaniRCaldasM (2012) Americanizing Brazilian management. Critical Perspectives on International Business8(1): 37–55.
3.
AshcroftBGriffithsGTiffinH (2002) The Empire Writes Back - Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. 2nd edition. London: Rotledge.
4.
Assis-PetersonACoxM (2007) Inglês em tempos de globalização: para além de bem e mal. Calidoscópio5(1): 5–14.
5.
Barrantes-MonteroL (2018) Phillipson’s linguistic imperialism revisited at the light of Latin American decoloniality approach. Revista Electrónica Educare22(1): 1–19.
6.
BarrosD (2002) Interação em anúncios publicitários. In: PretiD (org) Interação Na Fala e Na Escrita. São Paulo: Humanitas, pp.17–44.
7.
BarrosD (2005) Teoria Semiótica Do Texto. São Paulo: Ática.
8.
BarrosD (2006). Efeitos de oralidade no texto escrito. In: PretiD (org). Oralidade Em Diferentes Discursos. São Paulo: Humanitas, pp. 57–84.
9.
BhabhaH (1994) The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
10.
BoschiMBarrosDSauerbronnJF (2016) A introdução da disciplina de marketing no Brasil: “uma linguagem coque nos une”. Farol - Revista de Estudos Organizacionais e Sociedade3(8): 888–956.
11.
BoussebbaMSinhaSGabrielY (2014) Englishization in offshore call centers: a postcolonial perspective. Journal of International Business Studies45(9): 1152–1169.
12.
CagnanA (2008) Propagandas de escolas constituindo sujeitos: por que o Inglês é importante?Língua, Literatura e Ensino3: 79–87.
13.
Castro-GómezS (2008) (Post)Coloniality for dummies: Latin American perspectives on modernity, coloniality, and the geopolitics of knowledge. In: MoranãMDusselEJáureguiC (eds), Coloniality at Large: Latin America and the Postcolonial Debate. Duham: Duke University, pp. 259–285.
14.
ChoiP (2003) The best students will learn English’: ultra-utilitarianism and linguistic imperialism in education in post-1997 Hong Kong. Journal of Education Policy18(3): 673–694.
15.
DusselE (2002) World-systems and “Trans”-Modernity”. Nepantla: Views from the South3(2): 221–244.
16.
DusselE (2012) Transmodernity and interculturality: an interpretation from the perspective of Philosophy of Liberation. Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World1(3): 28–59.
17.
EscobarA (2004) Beyond the Third World: imperial globality, global coloniality and anti-globalisation social movements. Third World Quarterly25(1): 207–230.
18.
EscobarA (2012) Encountering Development – the Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University.
19.
FariaAHemaisM (2017) Rethinking the bottom of the pyramid: a critical perspective from an emerging economy. Marketing Theory17(3): 271–287.
20.
FariaS (2017) Internacionalização de periódicos brasileiros. Revista de Administração de Empresas57(4): 401–404.
21.
FastosoFWhitelockJ (2011) Why is so little marketing research on Latin America published in high quality journals and what can we do about it? Lessons from a Delphi study of authors who have succeeded. International Marketing Review28(4): 435–449.
22.
FiratAGummessonELevyS, et al. (2010) Commentaries on the state of journals in marketing. Marketing Theory10(4): 437–455.
23.
FlowerdewJ (2019) The linguistic disadvantage of scholars who write in English as an additional language: myth or reality. Language Teaching52: 249–260.
24.
FonsecaD (2018) Que língua fala a comunicação? A incidência da língua inglesa sobre textos portugueses de Marketing e Publicidade. In: MLSoaresNAmaranteDFonseca, et al. (eds), (Co)Insistências: Estudos em Letras, Artes e Comunicação. Vila Real: Centro de Estudos em Letras.
25.
GreimasAJCourtésJ (1982) Semiotics and Language: An Analytical Dictionary. Bloomington: Indiana University.
26.
GrosfoguelR (2013) The structures of knowledge in Westernized universities: epistemic racism/sexism and the four genocides/epistemicides of the long 16th century. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge11(1): 73–90.
27.
GummessonELehtinenUGronroosC (1997) Comment on Nordic perspectives on relationship marketing. European Journal of Marketing31(1–2): 10–16.
28.
HemaisB (2001) The discourse of research and practice in marketing journals. English for Specific Purposes20(1): 39–59.
29.
HénaultA (2006) História Concisa da Semiótica. São Paulo: Parábola.
30.
HoldenN (1998) Viewpoint: international marketing studies – time to break the English-language strangle-hold?International Marketing Review15(2): 86–100.
31.
HunterJ (1997) English language teaching: linguistic and cultural imperialism?Revista de Estudos da Linguagem6(5): 87–102.
32.
Ibarra-ColadoE (2006) Organization studies and epistemic coloniality in Latin America: thinking otherness from the margins. Organization13(4): 463–488.
33.
KiselmanC (2008) Esperanto: its origins and early history. In: APelczar (ed), Prace Komisji Spraw Europejskich PAU. Tom II. Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejetnosci.
34.
KumaravadiveluB (2016) The Decolonial Option in English Teaching: Can the Subaltern Act?Tesol Quarterly50(1): 66–85.
35.
LanderE (2005) Ciências Sociais: saberes coloniais e eurocêntricos. In ELander (org) A Colonialidade do Saber: Eurocentrismo e Ciências Sociais. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
36.
LeffaV (2002) Teaching English as a multinational language. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal10(1): 29–53.
37.
LiD (2002) Hong Kong parents’ preference for English-medium education: passive victims of imperialism or active agents of pragmatism? In: AKirkpatrick (ed), Englishes in Asia: Communication, Identity, Power & Education. Melbourne: Language Australia.
Maldonado-TorresN (2007) On the coloniality of Being: contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies21(2–3): 240–270.
40.
MariniR (2014) Subdesenvolvimento e Revolução. Rio de Janeiro: Insular.
41.
McClintockA (2013) Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest. Hoboken: Routledge.
42.
MendietaEPhillipsonRSkutnabb-KangasT (2006) English in the geopolitics of knowledge. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses53: 15–26.
43.
MendisDRambukwellaH (2020) Sri Lankan Englishes. In: AKirkpatrick (ed), The Routledge Handbook of World Englishes. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
44.
MignoloW (2003) The Darker Side of the Renaissance: Literacy, Territoriality, and Colonization. 2nd edition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
45.
MignoloW (2009) Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society26(7–8): 159–181.
46.
MignoloW (2011) The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham: Duke University Press.
47.
MignoloWTlostanovaM (2006) Theorizing from the borders: shifting to geo- and body-politics of knowledge. European Journal of Social Theory9(2): 205–221.
48.
MufweneS (2010) Globalization, global English, and world English(es): myths and facts. In: CouplandN (ed), The Handbook of Language and Globalization. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
49.
PattersonABrownS (2007) Inventing the pubs in Ireland: the importance of being postcolonial. Journal of Strategic Marketing15(1): 41–51.
50.
PennycookA (1994) The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. London: Longman.
51.
PennycookA (2007) ELT and colonialism. In: JCumminsCDavison (eds), International Handbook of English Language Teaching – Part 1. New York: Springer.
52.
PennycookA (2010) English and globalization. In: JMaybinJSwann (eds), The Routledge Companion to English Language Studies. London and New York: Routledge.
53.
PennycookACoutand-MarinS (2003) Teaching English as missionary language. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education24(3): 337–353.
54.
PhillipsonR (1992) Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University.
55.
PhillipsonR (1997) Realities and myths of linguistic imperialism. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development18(3): 238–248.
56.
PhillipsonR (2001) English for globalization or for the world’s people?International Review of Education47(3–4): 185–200.
57.
PhillipsonRSkutnabb-KangasT (1996) English only worldwide or language ecology?TESOL Quarterly30(3): 429–452.
58.
PrasadP (2015) Crafting Qualitative Research: Working in the Postpositivist Traditions. New York: Routledge.
59.
QuijanoA (2000) Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology15(2): 215–232.
60.
QuijanoA (2007) Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies21(2–3): 168–178.
61.
RichersR (1994) Recordando a infância do marketing brasileiro – um depoimento. Revista de Administração de Empresas34(3): 26–40.
62.
RosaMA (2003) Relação Entre Domínio da Língua Inglesa e Empregabilidade no Imaginário Brasileiro em Tempos de Mundialização do CapitalDissertação (Mestrado em Linguística Aplicada) - Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem (IEL). São Paulo: Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP).
63.
RosenstreichDWooliscroftB (2006) How international are the top academic journals? The case of marketing. European Business Review18(6): 422–436.
64.
SaidE (1990) Orientalismo – O Oriente Como Invenção Do Ocidente. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
Skutnabb-KangasT (2000) Linguistic Genocide in Education: Or Worldwide Diversity and Human Rights?Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67.
Skutnabb-KangasT (2003) Linguistic diversity and biodiversity – the threat from killer languages. In: CMair (ed), The Politics of English as a World Language – New Horizons in Postcolonial Cultural Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
68.
Skutnabb-KangasTPhillipsonR (2010) The global politics of language: markets, maintenance, marginalization, or muder? In: NCoupland (ed), The Handbook of Language and Globalization. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
69.
ŚliwaM (2008) Understanding social change through post-colonial theory: reflections on linguistic imperialism and language spread in Poland. Critical Perspectives on International Business4(2–3): 228–241.
70.
ŚliwaMJohanssonM (2014) How non-native English-speaking staff are evaluated in linguistically diverse organizations: a sociolinguistic perspective. Journal of International Business Studies45(9): 1133–1151.
71.
SouzaC (2013) Representações do exercício docente em cursos livres de idiomas: reflexões acerca de relações dicotômicas no ensino de língua inglesa. Vértices15(1): 31–45.
TietzeSDickP (2013) The victorious English language: hegemonic practices in the management academy. Journal of Management Inquiry22(1): 122–134.
74.
TlostanovaMMignoloW (2009) Global coloniality and the decolonial option. Kult6: 130–147.
75.
TonkinH (1993) Esperanto studies: an overview. Aspects of Internationalism: Language & Culture3: 9–20.
76.
VarmanR (2019) Postcolonialism, subalternity and critical marketing. In: MTadajewskiMHigginsDenegri-KnottJ, et al. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Critical Marketing. New York: Routledge.
77.
VarmanRSahaB (2009) Disciplining the discipline: understanding postcolonial epistemic ideology in marketing. Journal of Marketing Management25(7–8): 811–824.
