We all want to develop impactful and valuable theories, but what do we mean by ‘theory’? In this piece, we reply to the four readers’ comments on a recent paper in which we propose a theory typology that, in comparison to existing literature, offers a considerably broader, more pluralistic and, at the same time, more precise definition of the meaning(s) of ‘theory’ within academia. In their comments, the readers raise several insightful points that encourage us to further clarify the theory typology, as well as to expand on how it can be useful for researchers in marketing and social science more broadly.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ. (2013a) Constructing Research Questions: Doing Interesting Research. London: SAGE.
2.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ. (2013b) ‘Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research’, Journal of Management Studies50(1): 128–52.
3.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ. (2014) ‘Habitat and Habitus: Boxed-In Versus Box-Breaking Research’, Organization Studies35(7): 967–87.
4.
AlvessonM.SandbergJ. (2021) Re-Imagining the Research Process: A Spectrum of Metaphors. London: SAGE.
5.
AlvessonM.GabrielY.PaulsenR. (2017) Return to Meaning: For a Social Science with Something to Say. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BajdeD. (2021) ‘(a) Theory: A Commentary on Sandberg and Alvesson’s “Meanings of Theory”’, Marketing Theory21(3): 415–432.
7.
BrownS. (2021) ‘Mad, Bad, and Dangerous to Know: Some Thoughts on Typological Thinking’, Marketing Theory21(3): 415–432.
8.
CochoyF. (2021) ‘Detheorizing, Yes, Detheorizing! Comments on Sandberg and Alvesson’s “Meaning of Theory”‘, Marketing Theory21(3): 415–432.
9.
CucinaJ.M.McDanielM.A. (2016) ‘Pseudotheory Proliferation Is Damaging the Organizational Sciences’, Journal of Organizational Behavior37: 1116–25.
10.
FischerE. M. (2021) ‘Compliments, and a Complement: A Commentary on “Meanings of Theory: Clarifying Theory through Typification”’, Marketing Theory21(3): 415–432.
11.
GeertzC. (1973) Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
MintzbergH. (1979) The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14.
MorganG. (1997) Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15.
ReedI. A. (2011) Interpretation and Social Knowledge: On the Use of Theory in the Human Sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
SandbergJ.AlvessonM. (2020) ‘Meanings of Theory: Clarifying Theory through Typification’, Journal of Management Studies58: 487–516.
17.
SchönD. A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
18.
StarbuckW. H. (2009) ‘The Constant Causes of Never-Ending Faddishness in the Behavioral and Social Sciences’, Scandinavian Journal of Management25: 108–16.
19.
TourishD. (2019) Management Studies in Crisis: Fraud, Misconduct and Meaningless Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.