Although the extended self-construct has been widely investigated in consumer research, it has inspired relatively few critiques. Moreover, there has been little research which directly assesses consumers’ own emic perspectives on the extended self. Here, an empirical investigation is reported which explicitly solicits consumers’ own ideas and hermeneutically considers them in relation to etic researcher theory. The findings indicate a major theoretical blind spot: not only do consumers differ in the polysemy, that is, the various meanings and discourses they apply to the extended self but also that marketing theory should be revised to reflect this lack of universal understanding.
AhuviaA.C. (2005) ‘Beyond the Extended Self: Loved Objects and Consumers’ Identity Narratives’, Journal of Consumer Research32(June): 171–84.
2.
AllenJ.A.DiefendorffJ.MaY. (2013) ‘Differences in Emotional Labour Across Cultures: A Comparison of Chinese and U.S. Service Workers,’ Journal Business Psychology29: 21–25. doi: 10.1007/s10869-013-9288-7.
3.
ArielyD.HuberJ.WertenbrockK. (2005) ‘When Do Losses Loom Larger Than Gains?’ Journal of Marketing Research42(May): 134–38.
4.
ArselZ.ThompsonC.J. (2011) ‘Demythologizing Consumption Practices: How Consumers Protect Their Field-Dependent Identity Investments from Devaluing Marketplace Myths,’ Journal of Consumer Research37(February): 791–806.
5.
BajdeD. (2013) ‘Consumer Culture Theory (re) Visits Actor–Network Theory Flattening Consumption Studies’, Marketing Theory13(May): 227–42.
6.
BelkR.W. (1988) ‘Possessions and the Extended Self’, Journal of Consumer Research15(September): 139–68.
7.
BelkR.W. (1989) ‘Extended Self and Extending Paradigmatic Perspective’, Journal of Consumer Research16(June): 129–32.
8.
BelkR.W. (2013) ‘Digital Consumption and the Extended Self’, Journal of Marketing Management30(11-12): 1101–18.
9.
BogdanR.TaylorS.J. (1975) Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Phenomenological Approach to the Social Sciences. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
BorgersonJ. (2005) ‘Materiality, Agency, and the Constitution of Consuming Subjects: Insights for Consumer Research’, Advances in Consumer Research32(1): 439–44.
11.
BorofskyR. (1997) ‘Cook, Lono, Obeyesekere, and Sahlins’, Current Anthropology38(2): 255–82.
12.
BrownlieD.HewerP. (2007) ‘Concerning Marketing Critterati: Beyond Nuance, Estrangement and Elitism’, in SarenMichaelMaclarenPaulineGouldingChristinaElliottRichardShankarAviCatterallMiriam (eds), Critical Marketing. Defining the Field, pp. 44–68. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
13.
CohenA. (1994) Self Consciousness. An Alternative Anthropology of Identity. New York: Routledge.
14.
CohenJ.B. (1989) ‘An Over-Extended Self?’ Journal of Consumer Research16(June): 125–28.
15.
CotteJ.S.RatneshwarS.MickD.G. (2004) ‘The Times of Their Lives: Phenomenological and Metaphorical Characteristics of Consumer Lifestyles’, Journal of Consumer Research31(September): 333–45.
16.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987) A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
DerridaJ. (1997) Of Grammatology. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
18.
DonmoyerR.Yennie-DonmoyerJ. (1995) ‘Data as Drama: Reflections on the Use of Readers Theater as a Mode of Qualitative Data Display’, Qualitative Inquiry1(December): 402–28.
GiddensA. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity.
21.
GouldS.J. (2010) ‘To Thine Own Self(ves) Be True: Reflexive Insights for Etic Theory from Consumers Emic Constructions of the Self’, Consumption, Markets and Culture13, 2(June): 181–219.
22.
KleineS.S.KleineR.E.IIIAllenC.T. (1995) ‘How is a Possession “Me” or “Not Me”?’, Journal of Consumer Research22(December): 327–43.
23.
KozinetsR.V. (2002) ‘Can Consumers Escape the Market? Emancipatory Illuminations from Burning Man’, Journal of Consumer Research29(June): 20–38.
24.
KozinetsR.V.HandlemanJ.M. (2004) ‘Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology’, Journal of Consumer Research31(December): 691–704.
25.
LeeS. (1997) ‘How Lay is Lay? Chinese Students Perceptions of Anorexia Nervosa in Hong Kong’, Social Science & Medicine44(February): 491–502.
26.
LillardA. (1998) ‘Ethnopsychologies: Cultural Variations in Theories of Mind’, Psychological Bulletin123(January): 3–32.
27.
MarkmanA.B.BrendlC.M. (2005) ‘Constraining Theories of Embodied Cognition’, Psychological Science16(1): 6–10.
28.
MillerD. (1998) ‘Why Some Things Matter’, in Miller (ed.), Material Cultures: Why Some Things Matter, pp. 3–21. London: UCL Press.
29.
MylesJohn F. (2004) ‘From Doxa to Experience Issues in Bourdieu’s Adoption of Husserlian Phenomenology’, Theory, Culture & Society21(2): 91–107.
30.
ObeyesekereG. (1992) The Apotheosis of Captain Cook: European Myth-making in the Pacific. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
31.
ParkerS.K. (1995) ‘The Revenge of Practical reason? A Review Essay on Gananath Obeyesekere’s The Apotheosis of Captain Cook’, Oceania65(3): 257–67.
32.
PeñalozaL. (2008) ‘Moving from Subject–Object to Subject–Subject Relations: Comments on “Figuring Companion-Species Consumption”’, Journal of Business Research61(5): 419–21.
33.
RingbergT.ReihlenM. (2008) ‘Communication Assumptions in Consumer Research: An Alternative Socio-cognitive Approach’, Consumption Markets & Culture11(3): 173–89.
34.
RookD. (1987) ‘The Buying Impulse’, Journal of Consumer Research14(September): 189–99.
35.
SahlinsM. (1992) How “Natives” Think: About Captain Cook, for Example. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
SchroederJ.E.BorgersonJ.L. (2003) ‘Dark Desires: Fetishism, Ontology, and Representation in Contemporary Advertising’, in ReichertT.LambiaseJ. (eds) Sex in advertising: Perspectives on the Erotic Appeal, pp. 65–87. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37.
SolomonM.R. (1990) ‘The Imperial Self’, in GoldbergM. E.GornG.PollayR. W. (eds) Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. XVII, pp. 68–70. Provo: Association for Consumer Research.
38.
TadajewskiM.BrownlieD. (2008) Critical Marketing. Contemporary Issues in Marketing. West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.
39.
ThompsonC.J. (1990) ‘Eureka! And Other Test of Significance: A New Look at Evaluating Interpretive Research’, Advances in Consumer Research17(1): 25–30.
40.
ThompsonC.J. (2002) ‘A Re-Inquiry on Re-Inquries: A Postmodern Proposal for a Critical Reflexive Approach’, Journal of Consumer Research29(June): 142–45.
41.
ThompsonC.J.PollioH.R.LocanderW.B. (1994) ‘The Spoken and the Unspoken: A Hermeneutic Approach to Understanding the Cultural Viewpoints that Underlie Consumers’ Expressed Meanings’, Journal of Consumer Research21(December): 432–52.
42.
TinsleyH.E.A. (1997) ‘Synergistic Analysis if Structured Essays: A Large Sample, Discovery-Oriented, Qualitative Research Approach’, The Counseling Psychologist25(October): 573–85.
43.
VelliquetteA.M.MurrayJ.B.CreyerE.H. (1998) ‘The Tattoo Renaissance: An Ethnographic Account of Symbolic Consumer Behavior’, in AlbaJ. W.HutchinsonW. J. (eds) Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 25, pp. 461–67. Provo: Association for Consumer Research.
44.
WegenerD.T.PettyR.E. (1998) ‘The Naïve Scientist Revisited: Naïve Theories and Social Judgment’, Social Cognition16(Spring): 1–7.
45.
YangK.-SBondM.H. (1990) ‘Exploring Implicit Personality Theories with Indigenous or Imported Constructs: The Chinese Case’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology58(June): 1087–95.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
