This article offers an historical account of the contestation surrounding MP3 and its legitimation as a consumer choice option. We juxtapose our narrative against the service-dominant logic (SDL) literature, which positions the consumer as the co-creator of value. In these debates issues of power and politics are downplayed. By contrast, we foreground the politicized processes that frame consumer choice options. Through a study of the legal disputes around MP3 and digital delivery services, we make a case that law courts provide the scaffolding for judgements of value in the market system. Contrary to proponents of SDL, value is not only a function of co-production between company and customer. Nor do all consumption practices acquire sufficient legitimacy to enter into legally sanctioned value co-creation interactions. This is a function of the ‘hyper-power’ practiced by the legal community and related actors, which constitute or deny value to product offerings. Value is not, therefore, necessarily phenomenologically determined by the ultimate consumer. Neither are they the sovereign individual of marketing lore. Their subjectivity is patterned by macro and meso actors and service provision is permitted when it is capable of enrolment within the circuits of capital accumulation.
AhmadiA. (forthcoming) ‘Recreating Virginity in Iran: Hymenoplasty as a Form of Resistance’, Medical Anthropology Quarterly.
2.
AhrneG.AspersP.BrunssonN. (2015) ‘The Organization of Markets’, Organization Studies36(1): 7–27.
3.
AkakaM.A.VargoS.L. (2015) ‘Extending the Context of Service: From Encounters to Ecosystems’, Journal of Services Marketing29(6–7): 453–62.
4.
AkakaM.A.VargoS.L.LuschR.F. (2013) ‘The Complexity of Context: A Service Ecosystems Approach for International Marketing’, Journal of International Marketing21(4): 1–20.
5.
AldersonW. (1958) Marketing Behavior and Executive Action: A Functionalist Approach to Marketing Theory. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin.
6.
Amicus Curiae of Ad Hoc Copyright Coalition, Commercial Internet Exchange, Computer & Communications Industry Association, Information Technology Association of America, Netcoalition.com, United States Internet Industry Association, and United States Telecommunications Association Supporting None of the Parties. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (Court of Appeals. 25 August 2000).
7.
Amicus Curiae of Copyright Professors in Support of Reversal Consortium of 18 Copyright Professors. In Support of Defendant Napster’s Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. 10 August 2000).
8.
Appellant Napster, Inc.’s Opening Brief. Napster, Inc. v. A&M Records, Inc. No. 00-16401. (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit) 2001.
9.
ApplbaumK. (2009) ‘Getting to Yes: Corporate Power and the Creation of a Psychopharmaceutical Blockbuster’, Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry33(2): 185–215.
10.
ArnouldE. (2007) ‘Service-Dominant Logic and Consumer Culture Theory: Natural Allies in an Emerging Paradigm’, in BelkR.W.SherryJ.F. (eds) Consumer Culture Theory (Research in Consumer Behaviour Volume 11), pp. 57–76. London: Emerald.
11.
ArselZ.BeanJ. (2013) ‘Taste Regimes and Market Mediated Practice’, Journal of Consumer Research39(February): 899–917.
12.
AskegaardS.LinnetJ.P. (2011) ‘Towards an Epistemology of Consumer Culture Theory: Phenomenology and the Context of Context’, Marketing Theory11(4): 381–404.
13.
AtikD.FıratA.F. (2013) ‘Fashion Creation and Diffusion: The Institution of Marketing’, Journal of Marketing Management29(7–8): 836–60.
14.
BakanJ. (2005) The Corporation. Rev Ed. London: Constable.
15.
BanerjeeA.DasA.ChakrabartiG. (2011) ‘Tricks and Truths of Drug Marketing: An Insider’s Experience of an Indian Pharmaceutical Organization’, Asian Journal of Social Science39: 581–604.
16.
BenklerY. (1998) ‘The Commons as a Neglected Factor of Information Policy’. Presented at Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, September.
17.
BenklerY. (1999) ‘Free as the Air to Common Use: First Amendment Constraints on Enclosure of the Public Domain’, New York University Law Review74: 354–443.
18.
BreiV.TadajewskiM. (2015) ‘Crafting the Market for Bottled Water: A Social Praxeology Approach’, European Journal of Marketing49(3/4): 327–49.
19.
Brief of Plaintiffs/Apelles. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. 8 September 2000).
20.
BrownS. (2007) ‘Are We Nearly There Yet? On the Retro-Dominant Logic of Marketing’, Marketing Theory7(3): 291–300.
21.
BurrellG.MorganG. (1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. London: Heinemann Educational.
22.
ChandlerJ.D.VargoS.L. (2011) ‘Contextualization and Value-In-Context: How Context Frames Exchange’, Marketing Theory11(1): 35–49.
23.
ChaneyD.SlimaneK.B.HumphreysA. (forthcoming) ‘Megamarketing Expanded by Neo-Institutional Theory’, Journal of Strategic Marketing.
24.
Declaration of Charles Robbins, Proprietor of Oliver’s Record In Support of Plaintiff s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. 2 June 2000).
25.
Declaration of Chuck D. Leader and Co-Founder of Public Emily. In Support of Defendant Napster’s Opposition to Plaintiff s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. 2 June 2000).
26.
Declaration of Dennis M. Drake Audio Engineer In Support of Plaintiff s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. 9 June 2000).
27.
Declaration of Dr. Olkin In Support of Defendant Napster’s Opposition to Plaintiff s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. 12 July 2000).
28.
Declaration of Charles Hausman Anti-Piracy Counsel, RIAA In Support of Plaintiff s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. 12 June 2000).
29.
Declaration of Jack Valenti President and Chief Officer of the Motion Association of America (MPAA) In Support of Plaintiff s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. August 2000).
30.
Declaration of Jim Guerinot Owner Time Bomb and Personal Manager of the Offspring In Support of Defendant Napster’s Opposition of Plaintiff s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. 2 July 2000).
31.
Declaration of Mike Stoller Composer and Songewriter In Support of Plaintiff s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. 8 June 2000).
32.
DeleuzeG. (1999) Foucault. London: The Athlone Press.
33.
Denegri-KnottJ. (2004) ‘Sinking the Online “Music Pirates:” Foucault, Power and Deviance on the Web’, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication9(4). Available at: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol9/issue4/denegri_knott.html (accessed 31 December 2015).
34.
Denegri-KnottJ.TadajewskiM. (2010) ‘The Emergence of MP3 Technology’, Journal of Historical Research in Marketing2(4): 397–425.
DomeganC.HaaseM.HarrisK.. (2011) ‘Value, Values, Symbols and Outcomes’, Marketing Theory12(2): 207–11.
37.
EarleyA. (2015) ‘Critical Theory in Consumer Research: Advancing the Conversation’, in ThyroffA.E.MurrayJ.B.BelkR.W. (eds) Consumer Culture Theory (Research in Consumer Behavior, Vol. 17), pp. 77–87. London: Emerald.
Expert report of Deborah Jay, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of Field Research Corporation. In Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. 10 June 2000).
40.
Expert Report of J.D. Tygar, Ph.D., Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (Computer Science Division) and the School of Information Management and Systems, University of California, Berkeley. In Support of Defendant Napster’s Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. June 2000).
41.
Expert report of Michael Fine, Chief Executive Officer of Soundscan In Support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. 10 June 2000).
42.
Expert report of Peter S. Fader, PhD Associate Professor of Marketing of the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. In Support of Defendant Napster’s Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. 26 Cal. July 2000).
43.
Expert Report of Professor Lawrence Lessig Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure In Support of Defendant Napster’s Opposition to Plaintiff s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. Undated).
44.
Expert report of Robert E. Hall, PhD., Robert and Carole McNeil Joint Professor of Economics, Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution Stanford University. In Support of Defendant Napster’s Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. undated).
45.
Falconer Al-HindiK.StaddonC. (1997) ‘The Hidden Histories and Geographies of Neotraditional Town Planning: The Case of Seaside, Florida’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space15: 349–72.
46.
FıratA.F. (1987) ‘The Social Construction of Consumption Patterns: Understanding Macro Consumption Phenomena’, in FıratA.F.DholakiaN.BagozziR.P. (eds) Philosophical and Radical Thought in Marketing, pp. 251–67. Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
47.
FıratA.F.DholakiaN. (1977) ‘Consumption Patterns and Macromarketing: A Radical Perspective’, European Journal of Marketing11(4): 291–98.
48.
FıratA.F.DholakiaN. (1982) ‘Consumption Choices at the Macro Level’, Journal of Macromarketing2(2): 6–15.
49.
FoucaultM. (1972/2002) The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
50.
FoucaultM. (1976/1998) The History of Sexuality Volume 1. London: Penguin Books.
51.
FoucaultM. (1977/1991) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.
52.
FoucaultM. (1979) ‘Truth and Power: An Interview with Michel Foucault’, Critique of Anthropology4: 131–7.
53.
FoucaultM. (1984) ‘Foucault’ (under the pseudonym Maurice Florence, with F. Ewald). In Dictionnaire des Philosophes, Vol. I, pp. 941–44. Paris: PUF.
54.
FoucaultM. (2000) ‘Questions of Method’, in FaubionJ.D. (ed.) Essential Works of Foucault, Volume 3, pp. 223–38. London: Penguin.
55.
FoucaultM. (2006) Psychiatric Power: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1973-1974. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
56.
FoucaultM. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1978-1979. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
57.
FoucaultM. (2015) The Punitive Society: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1972-1973. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
FournierV.GreyC. (2000) ‘At the Critical Moment: Conditions and Prospects for Critical Management Studies’, Human Relations53(1): 7–32.
GieslerM. (2006) ‘Consumer Gift Systems’, Journal of Consumer Research33: 283–90.
61.
GieslerM. (2008) ‘Conflict and Compromise: Drama in Marketplace Evolution’, Journal of Consumer Research34(6): 739–53.
62.
GieslerM.PohlmannM. (2003a) ‘The Social Form of Napster: Cultivating the Paradox of Consumer Emancipation’, Advances in Consumer Research30. Available at: http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/7735/volumes/v30/NA-30 (accessed 31 December 2015).
63.
GieslerM.PohlmannM. (2003b) ‘The Anthropology of File-sharing: Consuming Napster as a Gift’, Advances in Consumer Research30. Available at: http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/8790/volumes/v30/NA-30 (accessed 31 December 2015).
64.
GieslerM.VeresiuE. (2014) ‘Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity’, Journal of Consumer Research41(October): 840–57.
65.
GrönroosC. (2012) ‘Conceptualising Value Co-creation: A Journey to the 1970s and Back to the Future’, Journal of Marketing Management28(13–14): 1520–34.
66.
GummessonE. (2008) ‘Extending the Service-Dominant Logic: From Customer Centricity to Balanced Centricity’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science36(1): 15–7.
67.
HoltD.B. (1998) ‘Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption?’, Journal of Consumer Research25(1): 1–25.
68.
HumphreysA. (2010a) ‘Megamarketing: The Creation of Markets as a Social Process’, Journal of Marketing74(March): 1–19.
69.
HumphreysA. (2010b) ‘Semiotic Structure and the Legitimation of Consumption Practices: The Case of Casino Gambling’, Journal of Consumer Research37: 490–510.
KotlerP. (1972) ‘A Generic Concept of Marketing’, Journal of Marketing36(2): 46–54.
73.
KotlerP. (1986) ‘Megamarketing’, Harvard Business Review64: 117–124.
74.
LaamanenM.SkålénP. (2015) ‘Collective-conflictual Value Co-creation: A Strategic Action Field Approach’, Marketing Theory15(3): 381–400.
75.
LaytonR.A. (2007) ‘Marketing Systems – A Core Macromarketing Concept’, Journal of Macromarketing27(3): 227–42.
76.
LaytonR.A. (2009) ‘On Economic Growth, Marketing Systems, and the Quality of Life’, Journal of Macromarketing29(4): 349–62.
77.
LazarsfeldP.F.MertonR.K. (1948/2002) ‘Mass Communication, Popular Taste and Organized Social Action’, in MarrisP.ThornhamS. (eds) Media Studies: A Reader, 2nd ed, pp. 18–30. New York: New York University Press.
78.
LessigL. (1999a) Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
79.
LessigL. (1999b) ‘The Limits in Open Code: Regulatory Standards and the Future of the Net’, Berkeley Technology Law JournalSpring: 759–70.
80.
LitmanJ. (1994) ‘Exclusive Right to Read’, The Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal13(1): 29–54.
Memorandum And Order Re Admissibility Of Expert Reports. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. August 10 2000).
83.
NCES (1999) ‘Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994-99’, National Centre of Education Statistics. Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000086.pdf (accessed 31 December 2015).
84.
New York Times (2000) ‘What’s Behind the Economy’s Boom’, New York Times, 25 February 2000.
85.
Opinion. (N.D. Cal. August 10, 2000). A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. Motion of Plaintiffs for Preliminary Injunction. (N.D. Cal. July 26, 2000).
86.
Opinion. Napster, Inc. v. A&M Records, Inc. No. 00-16401. (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, February 12 2001).
87.
Opposition of Defendant Napster, Inc. to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. July 26, 2000).
88.
Perry BarlowJ. (1994) ‘The Economy of Ideas’, Wired2(3): 85.
89.
Perry BarlowJ. (1996) ‘A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace’, Humanist-Buffalo56: 18–19.
90.
PietzW. (1985) ‘The Problem of the Fetish, I’, Res9(Spring): 5–17.
91.
PriorD.D. (forthcoming) ‘Incorporating Exchange Governance in Service-Dominant Logic: Lessons from Transaction Cost Economics’, Marketing Theory.
92.
RaymondE.S. (1998) The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. Sebastopol: O’Reilly.
TadajewskiM. (2006) ‘The Ordering of Marketing Theory: The Influence of McCarthyism and the Cold War’, Marketing Theory6(2): 163–200.
103.
TadajewskiM. (2010a) ‘Reading “The Marketing Revolution” Through the Prism of the FBI’, Journal of Marketing Management26(1–2): 90–107.
104.
TadajewskiM. (2010b) ‘Toward a History of Critical Marketing Studies’, Journal of Marketing Management26(9-10): 824.
105.
TadajewskiM. (2011) ‘Producing Historical Critical Marketing Studies: Theory, Method and Politics’, Journal of Historical Research in Marketing3(4): 549–75.
106.
TadajewskiM. (2012) ‘Character Analysis and Racism in Marketing Theory and Practice’, Marketing Theory12(4): 485–508.
107.
TadajewskiM.ChelekisJ.Deberry-SpenceB.. (2014). ‘The Discourses of Marketing and Development: Towards “Critical Transformative Marketing Research”’, Journal of Marketing Management30(17–18): 1728–1771.
Transcript of Proceedings. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. No. 99-5183. (N.D. Cal. 26 July 2000).
110.
VargoS.L.LuschR.F. (2004) ‘Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing’, Journal of Marketing68(January): 1–17.
111.
VargoS.L.AkakaM.A. (2012) ‘Value Cocreation and Service Systems (Re)Formation: A Service Ecosystems View’, Service Science4(3): 207–17.
112.
VargoS.L.LuschR.F. (2015) ‘Institutions and Axioms: An Extension and Update of Service-Dominant Logic’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science44(1): 5–23.
113.
VargoS.L.WielandH.AkakaM.A. (2015) ‘Innovation through Institutionalization: A Service Ecosystems Perspective’, Industrial Marketing Management44(January): 63–72.
114.
ZwickD.BradshawA. (forthcoming) ‘Biopolitical Marketing and the Ideology of Social Media Brand Communities’, Theory, Culture & Society.
