Calls for the abandonment of manipulative and controlling marketing communication practices have become increasingly common in relationship- and service-orientated marketing theories. Scholars supporting such calls agree that the pursuit of communicative control should be replaced by a dialogical, negotiative orientation. However, there has been little thought given to how exactly dialogical marketing communication can practically reconcile itself with the issue of persuasion. In this article, I argue that a critical appraisal of the techniques of the clinical hypnotist and therapist Milton Erickson can provide marketers with a constructive framework with which to refashion their communicative roles and practices around the notion of a therapeutic, rhetorically grounded, marketing dialogue in which marketing stakeholders interweave dynamic narratives of value, which have the power to change other stakeholders and themselves. I also use the comparison with service-orientated marketing literature to point out certain weaknesses in the Ericksonian conception of the therapist/client dyad.
AchrolR.S.KotlerP. (2011) ‘Frontiers of the Marketing Paradigm in the Third Millennium’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science40
(1): 35–52.
2.
AndersenP. (2001) ‘Relationship Development and Marketing Communication: An Integrative Model’, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing16
(3): 167–80.
3.
Aristotle. (2004) The Art of Rhetoric, Lawson-Tancred H (trans.). New York: Penguin Books.
4.
BallantyneD. (2004) ‘Dialogue and Its Role in the Development of Relationship Specific Knowledge’, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing19
(2): 114–23.
5.
BallantyneD.VareyR.J. (2006) ‘Creating Value-in-use Through Marketing Interaction: The Exchange Logic of Relating, Communicating and Knowing’, Marketing Theory6
(3): 335–48.
6.
BallantyneD.VareyR.J. (2008) ‘The Service-dominant Logic and the Future of Marketing’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science36
(1): 11–4.
7.
BallantyneD.FrowP.VareyR.J.. (2011) ‘Value Propositions as Communication Practice: Taking a Wider View’, Industrial Marketing Management40
(2): 202–10.
8.
BaluganiR. (2008) ‘Embodied Simulation and Imagery at Work in Hypnosis: Ericksonian Psychotherapy and Its Uniqueness’, Contemporary Hypnosis25(1): 29–38.
9.
BandlerR.GrinderJ. (1977) Patterns of the Hypnotic Techniques of Milton H. Erickson, M.D., Vol. I. Scotts Valley CA: Grinder & Associates.
10.
BattinoR. (2007) ‘Expectation: Principles and Practice of Very Brief Therapy’, Contemporary Hypnosis24
(1): 19–29.
11.
BennettD. (2005) ‘Getting the Id to Go Shopping: Psychoanalysis, Advertising, Barbie Dolls, and the Invention of the Consumer Unconscious’, Public Culture17
(1): 1–25.
12.
CahnM. (1989) ‘Reading Rhetoric Rhetorically: Isocrates and the Marketing of Insight’, Rhetorica7
(2): 121–44.
13.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1997) Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
14.
de ShazerS. (1994) ‘Essential, Non-essential: Vive la Difference’, in ZeigJ. K (ed.) Ericksonian Methods: The Essence of the Story, pp. 240–53. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
15.
DineenT. (2002) ‘The Psychotherapist and the Quest for Power: How Boundaries have Become an Obsession’, in LazarusA.ZurO. (eds) Dual Relationships and Psychotherapy, pp. 200–19. New York: Springer.
16.
DuncanT.MoriartyS.E. (1998) ‘A Communication-based Marketing Model for Managing Relationships’, Journal of Marketing62
(2): 1–13.
17.
EricksonM. (1964) ‘Initial Experiments Investigating the Nature of Hypnosis’, The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis7: 152–62.
18.
EricksonM.RossiE. (1979) Hypnotherapy: An Exploratory Casebook. New York: Irvington Publishers.
19.
EricksonM.RossiE. (1992) Experiencing Hypnosis: Therapeutic Approches to Altered States. New York: Irvington Publishers.
20.
EricksonM.RossiE. (1992) The February Man: Evolving Consciousness and Identity in Hypnotherapy. New York: Routledge.
21.
FourieD. (1991) ‘Family Hypnotherapy: Erickson or Systems?’, Journal of Family Therapy13: 53–71.
22.
GeisM. (1982) The Language of Television Advertising. New York: Academic Press.
23.
GilliganS. (1987) Therapeutic Trances: The Cooperation Principle in Ericksonian Hypnotherapy. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.
GrinderJ.BandlerR. (1976) The Structure of MagicVol. II. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books.
26.
GrönroosC. (2000) ‘Creating a Relationship Dialogue: Communication, Interaction and Value’, The Marketing Review1
(1): 5–14.
27.
GuillouxC. (2008) ‘The Landscape of Hypnosis in France in the Twentieth Century’, Contemporary Hypnosis25: 57–64.
28.
HandelmanJ.M. (1999) ‘Culture Jamming: Expanding the Application of the Critical Research Project’, Advances in Consumer Research26: 399–404.
29.
HaleyJ. (1993a) Jay Haley on Milton H. Erickson. London: Brunner-Routledge.
30.
HaleyJ. (1993b) Uncommon Therapy: The Psychiatric Techniques of Milton H. Erickson MD. New York: Norton.
31.
JenkinsT.ForrestA.W. (1999) ‘Ericksonian Approaches to Counseling: Toward an Assimilated Paradigm of Practice for the Twenty-First Century’, Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development37: 224–31.
32.
KirmayerL.J. (1988) ‘Word Magic and the Rhetoric of Common Sense: Erickson’s Metaphors for Mind’, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis36
(3): 157–72.
33.
Lindberg-RepoK.GrönroosC. (2004) ‘Conceptualising Communications Strategy from a Relational Perspective’, Industrial Marketing Management33
(3): 229–39.
34.
LynnS.HallquistM.N. (2004) ‘Toward a Scientifically Based Understanding of Milton H. Erickson’s Strategies and Tactics: Hypnosis, Response Sets and Common Factors in Psychotherapy’, Contemporary Hypnosis21
(2): 63–78.
35.
McQuarrieE.F.MickD. (1999) ‘Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text-interpretive, Experimental, and Reader-response Analyses’, Journal of Consumer Research26
(1): 37–54.
36.
MilesC. (2004) ‘The Prospect and Schizogenesis: A Batesonian Perspective on the Implications of the Double-bind in Advertising Messages’, Marketing Theory4
(4): 267–86.
37.
MorganS. (1999) ‘The Message is in the Metaphor: Assessing the Comprehension of Metaphors in Advertisements’, Journal of Advertising28
(4): 1–12.
38.
NelD.NiekerkR.BerthonJ.. (1999) ‘Going with the Flow: Web Sites and Customer Involvement’, Internet Research9
(2): 109–16.
39.
PhillipsB.McQuarrieE. (2004) ‘Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in Advertising’, Marketing Theory4
(1): 113–36.
40.
RosenS. (1982) My Voice Will Go with You: The Teaching Tales of Milton H. Erickson, M.D. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
41.
SchmidtR.KessJ. (1986) Television Advertising and Televangelism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V.
SiciliaM.RuizS. (2007) ‘The Role of Flow in Web Site Effectiveness’, Journal of Interactive Advertising8
(1): 1–15.
44.
SparksJ. (2000) ‘The Deconstruction of Magic: Rereading, Rethinking Erickson’, Family Process39
(3): 307–18.
45.
SullivanD. (1992) ‘Kairos and the Rhetoric of Belief’, Quarterly Journal of Speech78: 317–32.
46.
VareyR.J. (2000) ‘A Critical Review of Conceptions of Communication Evident in Contemporary Business and Management Literature’, Journal of Communication Management4
(4): 328–40.
47.
VareyR.J. (2002) Marketing Communication: Principles and Practice. London: Routledge.
48.
VareyR.J.BallantyneD. (2005) ‘Relationship Marketing and the Challenge of Dialogical Interaction’, Journal of Relationship Marketing4
(3): 13–30.
49.
VargoS.L.LuschR.F. (2004) ‘Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing’, Journal of Marketing68
(1): 1–17.
50.
VargoS.L.LuschR.F. (2008) ‘Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science36
(1): 1–10.
51.
ZaharnaR. (1995) ‘Understanding Cultural Preferences of Arabic Communication Patterns’, Public Relations Review21
(3): 241–55.
