The article summarizes extant research on context effects and choice theories in a
straightforward fashion. The context effects are used as benchmarks to compare six
choice theories. The context effects include similarity, attraction, compromise, and
reference point effects. The considered theories include simple scalability model,
random utility model, elimination by aspects model, strategy switching models,
componential context model, and connectionist network model of choice. The article
discusses the implications of each model for consumer behavior, and suggests that
the choice of model should depend on the characteristics of products, consumers and
purchase process.
Adaval, R.
and
Monroe, K.B.
(2002)
‘Automatic Construction and Use of Contextual Information for
Product and Price Evaluations’
, Journal of Consumer Research28(4):
572–588
.
2.
Becker, G.
,
Degroot, M.H.
and
Marschak, J.
(1963)
‘Probabilities of Choices Among Very Similar Objects: An
Experiment to Decide Between Two Models’
, Behavioral Science8(4):
306–311
.
3.
Block, H.D.
and
Marschak, J.
(1960) ‘Random Orderings and Stochastic Theories
of Response’, in
I. Olkin
,
S. Ghurye
,
W. Hoeffding
,
W. Madow
and
H. Mann
(eds) Contributions to Probability and Statistics, pp.
97–132.
Stanford: Stanford University Press
.
4.
Bock, R.D.
and
Jones, L.V.
(1968) The Measurement and Prediction of Judgment and
Choice.
San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day
.
5.
Brenner, L.
,
Rottenstreich, Y.
and
Sood, S.
(1999)
‘Comparison, Grouping and Preferences’
, Psychological Science10(3):
225–229
.
6.
Busemeyer, J.R.
,
Barkan, R.
,
Mehta, S.
and
Chaturvedi, A.
(2003) ‘Comparing Models of Preferential
Choice’, Technical Report, http://www.cogs.indiana.edu/Publications/techreps2003/253/index.html
7.
Busemeyer, J.R.
and
Johnson, J.G.
(2004) ‘Computational Models of Decision
Making’, in
D. Koehler
and
N. Harvey
(eds) Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, pp.
133–154.
Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Co.
8.
Busemeyer, J.R.
and
Townsend, J.T.
(1993)
‘Decision Field Theory: A Dynamic Cognition Approach to Decision Making’
, Psychological Review100:
432–459
.
9.
De Soete, G.
,
Feger, H.
and
Klauer, K.C.
(eds) (1989) New Developments in Probabilistic Choice
Modeling.
Amsterdam: North Holland
.
10.
Dhar, R.
(1997)
‘Consumer Preference for No-Choice Option’
, Journal of Consumer Research24:
215–231
.
11.
Dhar, R.
and
Glazer, R.
(1996)
‘Similarity in Context: Cognitive Representation and Violation of
Preference and Perceptual Invariance in Consumer Choice’
, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes67(3):
280–293
.
12.
Dhar, R.
,
Nowlis, S.M.
and
Sherman S.J.
(2000)
‘Trying Hard or Hardly Trying: An Analysis of Context Effects in Choice’
, Journal of Consumer Psychology9(4):
189–200
.
13.
Dhar, R.
and
Simonson, I.
(1999)
‘Making Complementary Choices in Consumption Episodes:
Highlighting versus Balancing’
, Journal of Marketing Research36:
29–44
.
14.
Dhar, R.
and
Simonson, I.
(2003)
‘The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice’
, Journal of Marketing Research40:
146–160
.
15.
Diederich, A.
(2003)
‘MDFT Account of Decision Making under Time Pressure’
, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review10(1):
157–166
.
16.
Edgell, S.E.
and
Geisler W.S.
(1980)
‘A Set-theoretic Random Utility Model of Choice Behavior’
, Journal of Mathematical Psychology21(3):
265–278
.
17.
Feinberg, F.M.
,
Kahn, B.E.
and
Mcalister, L.
(1992)
‘Market Share Response When Consumers Seek Variety’
, Journal of Marketing Research29(1):
227–237
.
18.
Gigerenzer, G.
and
Selten, R.
(eds) (2001) Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
19.
Guo, F.Y.
and
Holyoak, K.J.
(2002)
‘Understanding Similarity in Choice Behavior: Connectionist Model’
, in
Wayne D. Gray
and
Christian D. Schunn
(eds) Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the
Cognitive Science Society, pp.
393–398
. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Harless, D.W.
and
Camerer, C.
(1994)
‘The Predictive Validity of Generalized Expected Utility Theories’
, Econometrica62(6):
1251–1289
.
21.
Haykin, S.
(1994) Neural Networks.
New York: Macmillan
.
22.
Heath, T.B.
and
Chatterjee, S.
(1995)
‘How Entrants Affect Multiple Brands: A Dual Attraction Mechanism’
, Advances in Consumer Research18:
768–771
.
23.
Herne, K.
(1998)
‘Testing the Reference-Dependent Model: An Experiment on
Asymmetrically Dominated Reference Points’
, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making11(3):
181–192
.
24.
Hey, J.D.
and
Orme, C.
(1994)
‘Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theories Using
Experimental Data’
, Econometrica62(6):
1291–1326
.
25.
Hsee, C.K.
and
Leclerc, F.
(1998)
‘Will Products Look More Attractive when Evaluated Jointly or
when Evaluated Separately’
, Journal of Consumer Research25:
176–186
.
26.
Hsee, C.K.
,
Loewenstein, G.F.
,
Blount, S.
and
Bazerman, M.H.
(1999)
‘Preference Reversals Between Joint and Separate Evaluations of
Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis’
, Psychological Bulletin125(5):
576–590
.
27.
Huber, J.
,
Payne, J.W.
and
Puto, C.
(1982)
‘Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of
Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis’
, Journal of Consumer Research9(1):
90–98
.
28.
Lehmann, D.R.
(1972)
‘Judged Similarity and Brand Switching Data as Similarity Measures’
, Journal of Marketing Research9(3):
331–334
.
29.
Lehmann, D.R.
and
Pan, Y.
(1994)
‘Context Effects, New Brand Entry, and Consideration Sets’
, Journal of Marketing Research31:
364–374
.
30.
Luce, R.D.
(1959) Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical
Analysis.
New York: Wiley
.
31.
Luce, R.D.
and
Suppes, P.
(1965) ‘Preference, Utility, and Subjective
Probability’, in
R.D. Luce
,
B. Bush
and
E. Galanter
(eds) Handbook of Mathematical Psychology Vol.3, pp.
249–410.
New York: Wiley
.
32.
McFadden, D.
(1981) ‘Econometric Models of Probabilistic
Choice’, in
C.F. Manski
and
D. McFadden
(eds) Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Economic
Applications, pp. 198–272.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
33.
Mellers, B.A.
and
Biagini, K.
(1994)
‘Similarity and Choice’
, Psychological Review101:
505–518
.
34.
Nowlis, S.M.
and
Simonson, I.
(2000)
‘Sales Promotions and the Choice Context as Competing Influences
on Consumer Decision Making’
, Journal of Consumer Psychology9(1):
1–16
.
35.
Payne, J.W.
,
Bettman, J.R.
and
Johnson, E.J.
(1993) The Adaptive Decision Maker.
New York: Cambridge University Press
.
36.
Prelec, D.
,
Wernerfelt, B.
and
Zettelmeyer, F.
(1997)
‘The Role of Inference in Context Effects: Inferring What You
Want from What is Available’
, Journal of Consumer Research24(1):
118–125
.
37.
Ratneshwar, S.
,
Pechman, C.
and
Shocker, A.D.
(1996)
‘Goal Derived Categories and the Antecedents of Across Category Consideration’
, Journal of Consumer Research23(3):
240–250
.
38.
Roe, R.M.
,
Busemeyer, J.R.
and
Townsend, J.T.
(2001)
‘Mulitalternative Decision Field Theory: A Dynamic Connectionist
Model of Decision Making’
, Psychological Review108(2):
370–392
.
39.
Sen, S.
(1998)
‘Knowledge, Information Mode and the Attraction Effect’
, Journal of Consumer Research25(1):
64–77
.
40.
Simonson, I.
(1989)
‘Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects’
, Journal of Consumer Research16:
158–174
.
41.
Simonson, I.
and
Nowlis, S.M.
(2000)
‘The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer
Decision Making: Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons’
, Journal of Consumer Research27(1):
49–68
.
42.
Simonson, I.
and
Tversky, A.
(1992)
‘Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion’
, Journal of Marketing Research29:
281–295
.
43.
Sjoberg, L.
(1977)
‘Choice Frequency and Similarity’
, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology18:
103–115
.
44.
Svenson, O.
and
Maule, A.J.
(eds) (1993) Time Pressure and Stress in Human Judgment and
Decision Making.
New York: Plenum Press
.
45.
Thurstone, L.L.
(1959) The Measurement of Values.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
46.
Tversky, A.
(1972a)
‘Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of Choice’
, Psychological Review79(4):
281–299
.
47.
Tversky, A.
(1972b)
‘Choice by Elimination’
, Journal of Mathematical Psychology9(4):
341–367
.
48.
Tversky, A.
and
Kahneman, D.
(1991)
‘Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference Dependent Model’
, Quarterly Journal of Economics106(4):
1039–1061
.
49.
Tversky, A.
and
Sattath, S.
(1979)
‘Preference Trees’
, Psychological Review86(6):
542–573
.
50.
Tversky, A.
and
Simonson, I.
(1993)
‘Context Dependent Preferences’
, Management Science39:
1179–1189
.
51.
Usher, M.
and
McClelland, J.L.
(2001)
‘Loss Aversion and Inhibition in Dynamical Models of
Multialternative Choice’
, Psychological Review108(3):
550–592
.
