This article looks at three contemporary photo-based projects that reference Istanbul’s visual histories and document its endangered ecologies. These works take a critical approach to cultural heritage practices in contrast to official discourses that serve state power or justify capital accumulation. Osman Bozkurt’s Scenes, Ali Taptık’s Topographic Nostalgia, and Cemre Yeşil and Maria Sturm’s For Birds’ Sake focus on the relationships between the human and non-human elements of urban geographies. Their projects conceive of heritage as a practice that combines ecological concerns with preserving the cultural remnants of the urban past. Whether critiquing the aesthetic conventions of the picturesque, evoking an affective engagement with the viewer, or conjuring memories of displaced populations, these artists explore different visual approaches to embodying and remembering urban space and place. Taking a cue from their works, this article contemplates the possibility of envisioning heritage futures that can protect Istanbul’s biodiversity while being inclusive of cultural difference.
AhıskaM (2006) Occidentalism and registers of truth: The politics of archives in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey36: 9–29.
2.
AkdalAN (2017) Market Gardens and Gardeners of Ottoman Istanbul. Istanbul: Libra.
3.
AkpınarI (2024) 1960s Tax law and non-Muslim exodus from Istanbul, Turkification of the city. In: AkcanEDadiI (eds) Art and Architecture of Migration and Discrimination: Turkey, Pakistan, and Their European Diasporas. Abingdon: Routledge.
4.
AktarA (2003) Homogenising the nation, Turkifying the economy, the Turkish experience of population exchange reconsidered. In: HirschonR (ed.) Crossing the Aegean: An Appraisal of the 1923 Compulsory Population Exchange between Greece and Turkey. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
AndrewsM (1989) The Search for the Picturesque: Landscape Aesthetics and Tourism in Britain, 1760–1800. Aldershot: Scholar.
7.
AshworthGJ, et al. (2007) Pluralising Pasts: Heritage, Identity and Place in Multicultural Societies. London: Pluto Press.
8.
AykaçP (2021) The mutual construction of heritage and emergency: Neo-Ottomanist heritage policies in 2010s Turkey. In: ÇaylıE, et al. (eds) Architectures of Emergency in Turkey: Heritage, Displacement and Catastrophe. London: IB Tauris, 21–42.
9.
BatumanB (2015) Everywhere is Taksim: The politics of public space from nation-building to neoliberal Islamism and beyond. Journal of Urban History (online) 41(5): 881–907.
10.
BatumanB (2018) New Islamist Architecture and Urbanism: Negotiating Nation and Islam through Built Environment in Turkey. Abingdon: Routledge.
11.
BehdadAGartlanL (2013) Photography’s Orientalism: New Essays on Colonial Representation. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute.
CasidJH (2005) Sowing Empire: Landscape and Colonization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
ÇaylıE (2021) Introduction: The material and spatial politics of emergency. In: ÇaylıE, et al. (eds) Architectures of Emergency in Turkey: Heritage, Displacement and Catastrophe. London: IB Tauris, 1–20.
15.
ÇaylıE (2022) Victims of Commemoration: The Architecture and Violence of Confronting the Past in Turkey. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
16.
ÇelikZ (1986) Remaking Istanbul: The Portrait of an Ottoman City in the Nineteenth Century. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
17.
ÇelikZEldemE (2015) Camera Ottomana: Photography and Modernity in the Ottoman Empire, 1840–1914. Istanbul: Koç University Press.
18.
ÇınarA (2005) Modernity, Islam, and Secularism in Turkey: Bodies, Places, and Time. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
ÇınarABenderT (2007) Urban Imaginaries: Locating the Modern City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
De BellaigueC (2017) Religious revival. Apollo, November: 40–42.
21.
De CesariC (2016) Ottonostalgias and urban Apartheid. International Journal of Islamic Architecture5(2): 339–357.
22.
Der MatossianB (2011) The taboo within the taboo: The fate of ‘Armenian Capital’ at the end of the Ottoman Empire. European Journal of Turkish Studies. http://journals.openedition.org/ejts/4411; DOI :10.4000/ejts.4411.
23.
EldemSH (1977) Saʼdabad. Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı.
24.
EnlilZDinçerI (2022) Political dilemmas in the making of a sustainable city-region: The case of Istanbul. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland) (online) 14(6): 3299.
25.
ErensüSKaramanO (2017) The work of a few trees: Gezi, politics and space. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (online) 41(1): 19–36.
26.
ErsoyA (2003) A Sartorial Tribute to Late Tanzimat Ottomanism: The Elbise-i Osmaniyye Album. Muqarnas20: 187-207.
27.
GhulyanH (2019) The spatialization of Islamist, populist, and neo-Ottoman discourses in the Turkish capital under AKP rule. New Perspectives on Turkey61: 125–153.
28.
GülM (2009) The Emergence of Modern Istanbul: Transformation and Modernisation of a City. London: Tauris Academic Studies.
29.
GünalAÇelikkanM (2019) Hatırlayan şehir: Taksim’den Sultanahmet’e mekân ve hafıza (A city that remembers: Space and memory from Taksim to Sultanahmet). Istanbul: Hafıza merkezi.
30.
HamadehS (2007) The City’s Pleasures, Istanbul in the Eighteenth Century. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
31.
HammondT (2020) Papering, arranging, and depositing: Learning from working with an Istanbul archive. Area52: 204–212.
HarrisonR, et al. (2020) Heritage Futures: Comparative Approaches to Natural and Cultural Heritage Practices. London: UCL Press.
34.
HarveyD (2013) Rebel Cities, from the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso.
35.
HerzfeldM (2010) Engagement, gentrification, and the neoliberal hijacking of history. Current Anthropology51(2): 252–267.
36.
KaracaB (2019) When everything has been said before . . . Art, dispossession, and the economics of forgetting in Turkey. In: AltınayAG, et al. (ed.) Women Mobilizing Memory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 285–302.
LefebvreH (1996) Writings on Cities. Oxford: Blackwell.
39.
LoveringJTurkmenH (2011). Bulldozer neo-liberalism in Istanbul: The state-led construction of property markets, and the displacement of the urban poor. International Planning Studies16(1): 73–96.
40.
ÖzkanDBaykal BüyüksaraçG (2020) Commoning the City: Empirical Perspectives on Urban Ecology, Economics and Ethics. Abingdon: Routledge.
41.
ÖztuncayBErtemÖ (2018) Ottoman Arcadia: The Hamidian Exploration to the Land of Tribal Roots (1886). Istanbul: Anamed.
42.
ÖztürkmenA (2014) The park, the penguin, and the gas: Performance in progress in Gezi Park. TDR (1988–)58(3): 39–68.
43.
PakerH (2017) The politics of serving and neoliberal developmentalism: The megaprojects of the AKP as tools of hegemony building. In: AdamanF, et al. (eds) Neoliberal Turkey and its Discontents: Economic Policy and the Environment under Erdogan. London: IB Tauris, 103–119.
44.
PérouseJF (2015) The state without the public: Some conjectures about the administration for collective housing (TOKİ). In: AymesM, et al. (eds) Order and Compromise: Government Practices in Turkey from the Late Ottoman Empire to the Early 21st Century. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 169–191.
45.
RendaG (1977) Batılılaşma Döneminde Türk Resim Sanatı, 1700–1850. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.
46.
ŞekercioğluÇH, et al. (2011) Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis. Biological Conservation144: 2752–2769.
47.
ShawW (2003) Possessors and Possessed: Museums, Archaeology, and the Visualization of History in the Late Ottoman Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48.
TanyeliUTaptıkA (2009) Türkiye’nin görsellik tarihine giriş / Istanbul’u seyretmek. Istanbul: Ofset Yapımevi.
