Paper,glass,algorithm: teleprompters and the invisibility of screens

Abstract

The teleprompter, invented in 1948 as a memory aid for show business, has become a ubiquitous technology in modern politics. Yet, the hidden ways in which this device shapes our understanding of performance, newscasting, and political rhetoric are rarely studied by media scholars. Recognizing this lacuna, this article traces the evolution of the teleprompter from a cumbersome, human-operated device to an invisible system of screens designed to conceal its own existence. The teleprompter has not only shaped the standardization of speech, but also restructured the televised spectacle by collapsing the sonic, the tactile, and the optical. By focusing on teleprompter fiascos and moments of breakdown from President Eisenhower to President Trump, we make a broader argument regarding the importance of failure and the accidental to the study of visual culture.

Keywords

black box Donald Trump failure studies liveness opacity sound studies teleprompter

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

(1965) Teleprompter can’t do it all. The New York Times, 9 May: 10E.

Alan

Lane

(2003) Anchoring America: The Changing Face of Network News. New York, NY: Bonus Books.

Alexander

(2017) Rage against the machine: Buffering, noise, and perpetual anxiety in the age of connected viewing. Cinema Journal 56(2): 1–24.

Allen

(1993) Eisenhower and the Mass Media, Peace, Prosperity and Prime-Time TV. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Barton

Schlafly

(1952) Teleprompter – new production tool. Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers 58(6): 515–521.

Brockell

(2019) Trump’s fourth of July history speech: Turns out there weren’t airports back then. Washington Post, 5 July. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2019/07/05/turns-out-there-werent-airports-back-then/ (accessed 12 August 2019).

Bruckner

Chaill

Siegel

(2008). Special issue: Cinema and accident. Discourse, Fall: 279–288.

Carter

Egliston

(2020) No escape from reality. Real Life Magazine. Available at: https://reallifemag.com/no-escape-from-reality/ (accessed 4 December 2020).

Couldry

(2003) Media Rituals: A Critical Approach. London: Routledge.

10.

Crary

(1990) Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

11.

Dale

O’Sullivan

(2020) Trump campaign runs ads falsely accusing Biden of using teleprompter on James Corden’s show. CNN, 24 September. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/24/politics/fact-check-biden-teleprompter-corden/index.html (accessed 3 May 2021).

12.

Dayan

Katz

(1992) Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

13.

Detroit Free Press (1996) Speakers send a strong message, 27 August. Available at https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/99340726/ (accessed 4 December 2020).

14.

Doane

(1990) Information, crisis, catastrophe. In: Mellencamp

(ed.) Logics of Television: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 222–239.

15.

Doane

(2002) The Emergence of Cinematic Time: Modernity, Contingency, the Archive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

16.

Feuer

(1983) The concept of live television: Ontology as ideology. In: Kaplan

(ed.) Regarding Television: Critical Approaches: An Anthology. Los Angeles: AFI, 12–22.

17.

Fowle

(1960) Cadets lectured on missiles by TV. The New York Times, 8 April.

18.

Frey

Berger

Chen

(2017) Political Machinery: Automation Anxiety and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. London: Oxford Martin.

19.

GOP politicking on TV charged by Sen. Neuberger (1955) Broadcasting and Telecasting, 11 July: 85.

20.

Hayward

(2013) ATMs, teleprompters and photobooths: A short history of neoliberal optics. New Formations: A Journal of Culture/Theory/Politics 80: 194–208.

21.

Johnson

(2016) A new Donald Trump emerges at AIPAC, flanked by teleprompters. Washington Post, 21 March. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/03/21/a-new-donald-trump-emerges-at-aipac-flanked-by-teleprompters/ (accessed 10 August 2019).

22.

Kember

Zylinska

(2012) Life after New Media: Mediation as a Vital Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

23.

Mills

(2019) Vocal features: From voice identification to speech recognition by machine. Technology and Culture 60: 129–160.

24.

Marks

(2000) The Skin of the Film. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

25.

Mills

(2020) Lessons in queer voice, Amodern 9: Techniques and Technologies, April.

26.

Morris

(2004) Interrotron, FLM Magazine. Available at: http://www.errolmorris.com/content/eyecontact/interrotron.html (accessed 16 June 2021).

27.

Oppenheimer

(1996) Laughs, Luck, and Lucy: How I Came to Create the Most Popular Sitcom of All Times. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

28.

Rangan

(2019) Auditing the call center voice: Accented speech and listening in Sonali Gulati’s Nalini by Day, Nancy by Night. In: Roe

Pramaggiore

(eds) Vocal Projections. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic, 29–44.

29.

Redrobe Beckman

(2010) Crash: Cinema and the Politics of Speed and Static. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

30.

Roose

(2020) The long history of ‘hidden earpiece’ conspiracy theories. The New York Times, 29 September. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/29/technology/the-long-history-of-hidden-earpiece-conspiracy-theories.html (accessed 29 September 2020).

31.

Russell

(1953) Among the new words. American Speech 28(4): 294–296.

32.

Schulman

(2012) Ruling rhetorics. New Yorker. Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/09/03/rolling-rhetoric (accessed 12 August 2019).

33.

Siegel

(2014) Forensic Media: Reconstructing Accidents in Accelerated Modernity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

34.

Smith

(2008) Recorded laughter and the performance of authenticity. Vocal Tracks: Performance and Sound Media. Berkeley: University of California Press, 19 August.

35.

Spigel

(2009) TV by Design: Modern Art and the Rise of Network Television. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

36.

Sterne

(2012) The Sound Studies Reader. New York, NY: Routledge.

37.

Stromberg

(2012) A brief history of the teleprompter. Smithsonian.com. Available at: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/a-brief-history-of-the-teleprompter-88039053/ (accessed 10 August 2019).

38.

Turow

(2021) The Voice Catchers: How Marketers Listen In to Exploit Your Emotions, Your Privacy, and Your Wallet. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

39.

Wolber

(2019) How smart teleprompter can improve your business presentations, Tech Republic. Available at: https://www.techrepublic.com/article/how-smart-teleprompters-can-improve-your-business-presentations/ (accessed 16 June 2021).