This article examines the courtroom situation, focusing on courtroom spectatorship, architecture, and visuality in US trials. Visual evidence is situated within the architectural apparatus of the courtroom to examine how affect unfolds between a testifying witness and courtroom audience members. The movement of photographic evidence during judicial proceedings is linked to the disruption of temporal and spatial equilibrium. The idea is introduced that a feeling of vertigo is produced in the testifying witness and audience participants. Following Sianne Ngai’s conception of the ‘minor affects’, it is proposed that disconcertion and confusion are characteristics of witness testimony and thus important political affects to note in analyses of the relationship between vision and the discovery of justice in legal spectatorship.
AlexanderM (2012) The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: New Press.
2.
AuslanderP (2008) Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture. London: Routledge.
3.
BalabanCDJacobRG (2001) Background and history of the interface between anxiety and vertigo. Anxiety Disorders15(1/2): 27–51.
4.
BenjaminW (2008[1936]) The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility and Other Writings on Media. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BowersJ (2012) The Normative Case for Normative Grand Juries, 47 Wake Forest L. Rev. 319: 343–349.
6.
BronsteinAM (1995) Visual vertigo syndrome: Clinical and posturography findings. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry59(5): 472–476.
7.
ByersM (2009) The CSI Effect: Television, Crime, and Governance. New York: Lexington Books.
8.
CamptT (2015) Listening to Images. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
ConquergoodD (2002) Lethal theater: Performance, punishment, and the death penalty. Theater Journal54(3): 359–367.
10.
Gonzalez Van CleveN (2016) Crook County: Racism and Injustice in America’s Largest Criminal Court. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
EmerlingJGardnerR (2016) Introduction: Architecture! (To be said excitedly but with real frustration). journal of visual culture15(3): 295–300.
12.
FanonF (2008 [1952]) Black Skin, White Masks. New York: Grove Press.
13.
FeigensonN (2014) The visual in law: Some problems for legal theory. Law, Culture & the Humanities10(1): 13–23.
14.
FeigensonNSpieselC (2009) Law on Display: The Digital Transformation of Legal Persuasion and Judgment. New York: New York University Press.
15.
FlusserV (2000) Towards a Philosophy of Photography. London: Reaktion.
16.
GallowayA (2012) The Interface Effect. Cambridge: Polity Press.
17.
GilmoreR (2007) Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis and Opposition in Globalizing California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
KhesthiR (2015) Modernity’s Ear: Listening to Race and Gender in World Music. New York: New York University Press.
19.
MallinsonA (2011) Introduction to visual–vestibular mismatch. PhD thesis, Maastricht University.
20.
MirzoeffN (2011) The Right to Look: A Counterhistory of Visuality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
21.
MooreK (2015) Held in the Light: Reading Rihanna’s Abuse Photography (Feminist Surveillance Studies). Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 105–124.
22.
MulcahyL (2007) Architects of justice: The politics of courtroom design. Social and Legal Studies16(3): 383–403.
23.
NgaiS (2005) Ugly Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
RedfernMSYardleyLBronsteinAM (2001) Visual influences on balance. J. Anxiety Disord. (Special Contribution). 15: 81–94.
25.
ResnikJCurtisD (2011) Representing Justice: Invention, Controversy, and Rights in City-States and Democratic Courtrooms. Chelsea: Sheridan Books.
26.
RobertsDE (2001) Criminal Justice and Black Families: The Collateral Damage of Over-Enforcement, 34 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1005, 1006–1009.
27.
RobertsDE (2004) The Social and Moral Cost of Mass Incarceration in African American Communities, 56 Stan. L. Rev. 1271–1305.
28.
RobertsJ (2013) Crashing the Misdemeanor System. Wash. & Lee L. Rev., 70 (2), 1089–1131.
29.
Robles-AndersonE (2012) The crystal cathedral: Architecture for mediated congregation. Public Culture24(3): 577–599.
30.
Robles-AndersonE (forthcoming) Mediating Eternity: The Crystal Cathedral and the Architecture of Mediated Congregation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
31.
RyanMJ (2012) Juries and the Criminal Constitution. Alabama Law Review, forthcoming; SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 121.
32.
SerresM (2007) The Parasite. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
33.
SchwartzL (2009) Mechanical Witness: A History of Motion Picture Evidence in U.S. Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
SherwinR (2011) Visualizing Law in the Age of the Digital Baroque: Arabesques and Entanglements. New York: Routledge.
35.
SilvermanK (2015) The Miracle of Analogy, or History of Photography, Part I. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36.
SimmonsR (2002) Re-Examining the Grand Jury: Is There Room for Democracy in the Criminal Justice System?, 82 B.U. L. Rev. 1, 23, 2–76.
37.
SimonJ (2007) Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
SimonsonJ (2014) The Criminal Court audience in a post-trial world. Harvard Law Review127(8): 2174–2232.
39.
SpillersH (2003) Black, White, and in Color: Essays on American Literature and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
StierliM (2016) Architecture and visual culture: Some remarks on an ongoing debate. journal of visual culture15(3): 313–314.
