The recent explosion of interest in visual culture has often been premised on the assumption that distinct scopic regimes or visual practices are relative to the cultures out of which they emerge. Any naturalist hope of locating transcendental visual experience prior to its cultural coding is thus taken to be in vain. This article takes issue with this premise, not by returning to a discredited naturalism, but rather by putting pressure on the culture concept itself. Drawing on the work of such theorists as Bruno Latour, David McDougall and Régis Debray, it argues that visual experience presents a challenge to the belief that it is ‘culture all the way down’. Although it does not claim that arguments for relativism can be entirely refuted, it does conclude that an exploration of visuality shows that grounding them in the alleged incommensurability of cultures is unpersuasive.
Allert, B. (ed.) (1996) Languages of Visuality: Crossings between Science, Art, Politics, and Literature. Detroit: Kritik.
2.
Barthes, R. (1981) Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang.
3.
Baudrillard, J. (1988) ‘Simulacra and Simulations’, in Mark Poster (ed.) Selected Writings. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
4.
Boorstin, D.J. (1961) The Image. New York: Harper & Row.
5.
Brennan, T. and Jay, M. (eds) (1996) Vision in Context: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Sight. New York: Routledge.
6.
Clifford, J. (1988) The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Comolli, J.-L. (1985) ‘Machines of the Visible’, in Teresa de Lauretis and Stephen Heath (eds) The Cinematic Apparatus. New York: St Martins Press.
8.
Crary, J. (1990) Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
Crary, J. (1999) Suspensions of Perception: Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Debord, G. (1994) The Society of the Spectacle, trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Books.
11.
Debray, R. (1996) Media Manifestos: On the Technological Transmission of Cultural Forms, trans. Eric Rauth. London: Verso.
12.
Eagleton, T. (2000) The Idea of Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
Eco, U. (1982) ‘Critique of the Image’, in Victor Burgin (ed.) Thinking Photography. London: Macmillan.
14.
Foster, H. (ed.) (1988) Vision and Visuality. Seattle: Bay Press.
15.
Gebauer, G. and Wulf, C. (1995) Mimesis: Art-Culture-Society, trans. Don Reneau. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Hartman, G.H. (1997) The Fateful Question of Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
17.
Heywood, I. and Sandywell, B. (1999) Interpreting Visual Culture: Explorations in the Hermeneutics of the Visual. London: Routledge.
18.
Jay, M. (1988) ‘Scopic Regimes of Modernity’, in Hal Foster (ed.) Vision and Visuality. Seattle: Bay Press.
19.
Jay, M. (1993a) Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in 20th-Century French Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
Jay, M. (1993b) ‘The Debate over Performative Contradiction: Habermas and the Post-Structuralists’, in Force Fields: Between Intellectual History and Cultural Critique. New York: Routledge.
21.
Jay, M. (forthcoming) ‘The Menace of Consilience: Keeping the Disciplines Unreconciled’, Stanford Humanities Review.
22.
Jenks, C. (ed.) (1995) Visual Culture. London: Routledge.
23.
Kaufmann, T.D. (1996) Response to the Visual Culture Questionnaire, October.
24.
Kirby, J.T. (1996) ‘Classical Greek Origins of Western Aesthetic Theory’, in B. Allert (ed.) Languages of Visuality. Detroit: Kritik.
25.
Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern, trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Levin, D.M. (ed.) (1993) Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
Levin, D.M. (1997) Sites of Vision: The Discursive Construction of Sight in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1988) The Differend: Phrases in Dispute, trans. Georges Van Den Abbeele. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
MacDougall, D. (1998) Transcultural Cinema, ed. Lucien Taylor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
Markus, G. (1993) ‘Culture: The Making and the Make-up of a Concept (An Essay in Historical Semantics)’, Dialectical Anthropology, l8.
31.
Melville, S. and Readings, B. (eds) (1995) Vision and Textuality. Durham: University of North Carolina Press.
32.
Mirzoeff, N. (ed.) (1998) The Visual Culture Reader. London: Routledge.
33.
Mirzoeff, N. (1999) An Introduction to Visual Culture. London: Routledge.
34.
Mitchell, W.J.T. (ed.) (1980) The Languages of Images. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Mitchell, W.J.T. (1986) ‘Nature and Convention: Gombrich’s Illusions’, in Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Mitchell, W.J.T. (1994) ‘The Pictorial Turn’, in Picture Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Mulhern, F. (2000) Culture/Metaculture. London: Routledge.
38.
Panofsky, E. (1991) Perspective as Symbolic Form, trans. Christopher S. Wood. New York: Zone Books.
39.
Rose, J. (1986) Sexuality in the Field of Vision. London: Verso.
40.
Soper, K. (1995) What is Nature?Oxford: Blackwell.
41.
Tagg, J. (1988) The Burden of Representation: Essays on Photographies and Histories. London: Macmillan Education.
42.
Timpanaro, S. (1975) On Materialism, trans. Lawrence Garner. London: Humanities Press.
43.
Wilson, E.O. (1998) Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Knopf.
