CapleHTianP (2022) Opening up semiotic spaces for gender expression: A case study of the construction of gender in Australian award-winning early childhood picture books. Visual Communication DOI 10.1177/14703572211069604.
4.
CatalaniA (2019) Refugee artists and memories of displacement: A visual semiotics analysis. Visual Communication20(2): 184–208.
De La PresaLRuizP E (2022) (Re) locating photojournalism within a photomedia economy: A case study on the meaning-making process with stories of female Boko Haram survivors. Visual Communication21(2): 256–279.
8.
ForcevilleCPalingS (2018) The metaphorical representation of depression in short, wordless, animation films. Visual Communication20(1): 100–120.
9.
HallidayMAK (2015) The influence of Marxism. In WebsterJ (Ed) The Bloomsbury Companion to MAK Halliday. London: Bloomsbury, 94–100.
10.
HolsanovaJHolmqvistKRahmH (2006) Entry points and reading paths on newspaper spreads: comparing a semiotic analysis with eye-tracking measurements. Visual Communication 5,1: 65–93. DOI 10.1177/1470357206061005.
KressGvan LeeuwenT (2001) Multimodal communication: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold [1996].
13.
KressGvan LeeuwenT (2021) Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge. 3rd Edition.
14.
KwesellA (2020) Trauma, self-stigma, and visual narrative: participatory research in Shinchimachi, Fukushima, following Japan’s 2011 nuclear disaster. Visual Communication21(2): 280–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357220912458.
15.
MainAYamada-RiceD (2022) Evading big brother: Using visual methods to understand children’s perceptions of sensors and interest in subverting digital surveillance. Visual Communication21(3): 384–417.
16.
ManovichL (2012) How to compare one million images. In BerryDM (Ed) Understanding digital humanities. London: Palgrave Macmillan249–278.
17.
ManovichL (2018) 100 Billion Data Rows per Second: Media analytics in the early 21st Century. International Journal of Communication12: 473–488.
18.
MatonK (2016) Legitimation Code Theory: building knowledge about knowledge-building. In MatonKHoodSShayS (Eds) Knowledge-building: Educational studies in Legitimation Code Theory. London: Routledge1–24.
19.
PentzoldCRotheI (2022) Drawn into the future: The epistemic work of visual scenarios in the configuration of human-robot encounters. Visual Communication DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572221112676.
20.
PflaegingJWildfeuerJBatemanJA (2021) Empirical multimodality research: The state of play. In PflaegingJWildfeuerJBatemanJA (Eds) Empirical multimodality research. Methods, evaluations, implications. Berlin: de Gruyter1–34.
21.
Raappana-LuiroL (2020) Happy hearts do not hang down: the design process for the 2018 Valentine’s Day postage stamps of Finland. Visual Communication. doi:10.1177/1470357220917435
22.
RobsonI (2022) Learning through mess: Sensemaking visual communication practices in a UK multidisciplinary applied health study. Visual Communication21(3): 451–471.
23.
ThomsonTJ (2021) International, innovative, multimodal and representative? The geographies, methods, modes and aims present in two visual communication journals. Visual Communication DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211038987.
24.
van LeeuwenT (1996) The representation of social actors. In Caldas-CoulthardCRCoulthardM (Eds)Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge32–70.
25.
van LeeuwenT (2008) Discourse and practice : new tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HailingYuYeYan (2021) Legitimation in documentary: modes of representation and legitimating strategies in ‘The Lockdown: One month in Wuhan’. Visual Communication DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211015809
28.
ZhongxuanLinLiuYang (2021) The power to see: Visualizing disabilities in China. Visual Communication20(4): 605-616.