Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

By bringing together the spatially oriented ‘milieu’ and ‘atmosphere’ approach with the method of self-generated photo elicitation, this visual essay examines the possibility of the mediation of new meanings in urban neighbourhood representation and spatial organization. The milieu/atmosphere relationship offers a methodological background for visual communication in landscape, where, besides common and conscious interpretations, expression is given to non-graspable, sometimes inexplicable internal atmospheric experiences that have great potential to shift acknowledged understandings and interpretations of landscape aesthetics. A reflexive self-generated photo elicitation is introduced to bringing into communication unfamiliar atmospheric visual landscape experiences. This method is used in the underprivileged parts of the Kopli neighbourhood of North-Tallinn, Estonia. Some of the participants’ representations were handled as atmospheric pictures, which, although different from the acknowledged milieu approach, brought into communication the milieu character of a strong neighbourhood.

Keywords

atmosphere collaborative self-generated photo elicitation meaning-making milieu neighbourhood

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Belting

(2001) Bild-Anthropologie. Entwürfe für eine Bildwissenschaft, ed. Boehm

Stierle

. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.

Berque

(1997) Japan: Cities and Social Bonds, trans. Turner

. London: Pilkington Press.

Burgin

(1994[1982]) Introduction. In: Burgin

(ed.) Thinking Photography. London: Macmillan, 1–14.

Böhme

(1995) Atmosphäre. Frankfurt am Main: Edition Suhrkamp.

Clark-Ibáñez

(2007) Inner-city children in sharper focus: Sociology of childhood and photo elicitation interviews. In: Stanczak

(ed.) Visual Research Methods: Image, Society and Representation. Los Angeles: Sage, 167–196.

Claval

(2004) The cultural approach in human geography (L’approche culturelle en géographie): A perspective on eight years. Editorial: IGU Commission no. 30/Commission no. 30 de l’UGI 9: 1–10.

Cosgrove

(2006) Modernity, community and the landscape idea. Journal of Material Culture 11(12): 49–66.

Cosgrove

(2008) Images and imagination in 20th-century environmentalism: From the Sierras to the Poles. Environment and Planning A 40: 1862–1880.

Emmison

(2004[1997]) The conceptualization and analysis of visual data. In: Silverman

(ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 246–265.

10.

Flyvbjerg

(2004) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In: Seale

. (eds) Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage, 420–434.

11.

Friday

(2002) Aesthetics and Photography. Aldershot: Ashgate.

12.

Gerring

(2007) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Hall

(2003[1997]) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage.

14.

Hasse

(2002) Zum Verhältnis von Stadt und Atmosphäre. In: Hasse

(ed.) Subjektivität in der Stadtforschung. Frankfurt am Main: Selbstverlag Institut für Didaktik der Geographie, 19–40.

15.

Jewitt

Oyama

(2001) Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In: Van Leeuwen

Jewitt

(eds) Handbook of Visual Analysis. London: Sage, 134–156.

16.

Lapa

(2013) The relationship between townspeople and land as a premise to the process of teaching landscaping. In: Newmann

. (eds) Landscape & Imagination: Towards a New Baseline for Education in a Changing World. Pontedera, Tuscany: Bandecci & Vivaldi, 429–432.

17.

Lindlof

Taylor

(2002) Qualitative Communication Research Methods, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

18.

Metta

(2013) Landscape as a play action: The ‘as if’ stratagem. In: Newmann

. (eds) Landscape & Imagination: Towards a New Baseline for Education in a Changing World. Pontedera, Tuscany: Bandecci & Vivaldi, 311–314.

19.

Mitchell

WJT

(2010) The future of the image: Rancière’s road not taken. In: Curtis

(ed.) The Pictorial Turn. London: Routledge, 37–48.

20.

Pink

(2004) Visual methods. In: Seale

. (eds) Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage, 391–408.

21.

Schmitz

(2010) Jenseits des Naturalismus. Freiburg/Munich: Verlag Karl Alber.

22.

Semm

(2011) Atmosfäärilisus Arne Maasiku linnafotodel. Linnamiljöö subjektiivne käsitlus (The subjective meaning of milieu through the example of Arne Maasik’s atmospheric city photography. Kunstiteaduslikke Uurimusi (Studies on art and architecture) Studien für Kunstwissenschaft 20(1–2): 98–117.

23.

Semm

(2013) Towards the experiential meaning of milieu for neighborhood regeneration: Discussions on the institutional designation of milieu-valued areas in Tallinn, Estonia. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 28(3): 289–504.

24.

Stanczak

(2007) Introduction: Images, methodologies, and generating social knowledge. In: Stanczak

(ed.) Visual Research Methods: Image, Society and Representation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1–21.

25.

Walton

(2008) Marvelous Images: On Values and the Arts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

26.

Wylie

(2007) Landscape. London: Routledge.

27.

Zajac

(2009) Interferenzialität als mitteleuropäisches Raumparadigma. In: Csáky

(ed.) Kommunikation, Gedächtnis, Raum. Kulturwissenschaften nach dem ‘Spatial Turn’. Bielefeld: Transcript, 133–147.

Visual meaning-making in an underprivileged neighbourhood landscape: milieus and atmospheres

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References