This article describes the variation in title sequences for American television series (a sequence of moving images and sound at the beginning of a television series). Using a quantitative survey of 50 contemporary fictional television series, it explores key features of the television title sequence – such as length, credits, characters, sound and style – and relates these to its functional characteristics. In so doing, the article provides a synchronic snapshot of a significant contemporary cultural product that viewers regularly engage with and enjoy. The survey not only shows the variation inherent in these cultural products, but also pinpoints areas that are worth investigating more closely and in depth.
BaldryA.P. (2004) Phase and transition, type and instance: Patterns in media texts as seen through a multimodal concordancer. In: O’HalloranK. (ed.) Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. London: Continuum, 83–108.
2.
‘Barenaked Ladies on The Big Bang Theory’ (2011) Supplementary feature, The Big Bang Theory. The Complete Fourth Season, DVD. Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc.
3.
BednarekM. (2010) The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. London: Continuum.
4.
BednarekM. (2012) ‘Get us the hell out of here’: Key words and trigrams in fictional television series. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics17(1): 35–63.
5.
BednarekM. (2013) The television title sequence: A visual analysis of Flight of the Conchords. In: DjonovEZhaoS. (eds) Critical Multimodal Studies of Popular Culture. London: Routledge, 36–54.
6.
BellJ. (1992) In search of a discourse on aging: The elderly on television. The Gerontologist32(3): 305–311.
7.
BriggsM. (2010) Television, Audiences and Everyday Life. Maidenhead/New York: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
8.
BubelC. (2006) The linguistic construction of character relations in TV drama: Doing friendship in sex and the city. PhD thesis, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany. Available at http://scidok.sulb.uni-saarland.de/volltexte/2006/598/ (last accessed 6 February 2014).
9.
BurtonG. (2000) Talking Television: An Introduction to the Study of Television. London: Arnold.
10.
CapleH. (2010) Doubling-up: Allusion and bonding in multisemiotic news stories. In: BednarekMMartinJ.R. (eds) New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity and Affiliation. London: Continuum, 111–133.
11.
CapleH. (2013) Photojournalism. A Social Semiotic Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
CreeberG. (ed.) (2001) The Television Genre Book. London: Routledge.
13.
DickT. (2010) Behold the new golden age of TV. The Sydney Morning Herald News Review23–24, October: 6–7.
14.
GilesD. (2002) Parasocial interaction: A review of the literature and a model for future research. Media Psychology4(3): 279–304.
15.
GripsrudJ. (1995) The Dynasty Years: Hollywood, Television and Critical Media Studies. London: Routledge.
16.
KressG.Van LeeuwenT. (2006) Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
17.
KutnowskiM. (2008) Trope and irony in The Simpsons’ Overture. Popular Music and Society31(5): 599–616.
18.
MachinD. (2009) Multimodality and theories of the visual. In: JewittC. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge, 181–190.
19.
McEneryT.XiaoR.TonoY. (2006) Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.
20.
MerrilM. (2004) First frames: Titles in the digital film. Metro Magazine142: 114–117.
21.
MistryA. (2006) Branding guide. The Televisual Annual, 2July: 93.
22.
MittellJ. (2004) A cultural approach to television genre theory. In: AllenR.HillA. (eds) The Television Studies Reader. London: Routledge, 171–181.
23.
MoschiniI. (2011) Music and series: The verbalizing role of soundtrack lyrics from TV series to user-generated narrations. Visual Communication10: 193–208.
O’HalloranK.L. (in press) Challenges and solutions to multimodal analysis: Technology, theory and practice. In: FangY.WebsterJ. (eds) Developing Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and Application. London: Equinox.
26.
PiazzaR.BednarekMRossiF. (eds) (2011) Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27.
QuaglioP. (2009) Television Dialogue. The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28.
RichardsonK. (2010) Television Dramatic Dialogue: A Sociolinguistic Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
StanitzekGAplevichN. (2009) Reading the title sequence (Vorspann, Générique). Cinema Journal48(4): 44–58.
30.
Van LeeuwenT. (2005) Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
