The aim of this article is to advance current understandings of cross-media communication in advertising. The study is based on a sample of 80 television commercials and their announced websites, and the article is inspired by recent studies of cross-media advertising effectiveness as well as semiotic perspectives on multimodal analysis. The authors present three dimensions to be considered when examining multimodal connections between television commercials and websites: announcements, participants and address strategy. These dimensions are brought together in an analytical framework that can serve as inspiration for further research on cross-media communication in advertising and possibly in other types of communication.
AssaelH. (2011) From silos to synergy. Journal of Advertising Research51: 42–58.
2.
BolterJ.DGrusinR. (1999) Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
ChangYThorsonE. (2004) Television and web advertising synergies. Journal of Advertising33(2): 75–84.
4.
CoffeyS.StippH. (1997) The interactions between computer and television usage. Journal of Advertising Research37(2): 61–67.
5.
DijkstraM.BuijtelsH.Van RaaijW.F. (2005) Separate and joint effects of medium type on consumer responses: A comparison of television, print, and the Internet. Journal of Business Research58(3): 377–386.
6.
EngebretsenM. (2012) Balancing cohesion and tension in multimodal rhetoric. An interdisciplinary approach to the study of semiotic complexity. Learning, Media and Technology37(2): 145–162.
7.
GeertzC. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. London: Hutchinson.
8.
GraakjærN.JJessenI.B. (2012) Fra tv til net – Reklamer i et tværmedialt og æstetisk perspektiv (From television to web – Advertising in a cross-media and aesthetic perspective). In: StigelJ. (ed.) Reklame – eller hvordan sætter man sving i bevidstheden (Advertising – or how to affect the mind). Aarhus: Systime Academic.
9.
HerringS.C. (2004) Content analysis for new media: Rethinking the paradigm. In: New Research for New Media: Innovative Research Methodologies Symposium, Working Papers and Readings. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota School of Journalism and Mass Communication,47-66. Available at: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/newmedia.pdf (consulted 5 August 2013).
10.
JanoschkaA. (2004) Web Advertising: New Forms of Communication on the Internet. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
11.
KimJ.McMillanS.J.HwangJ-S. (2005) Strategies for the Super Bowl of advertising: An analysis of how the Web is integrated into campaigns. Journal of Interactive Advertising6(1): 46–60.
12.
KressG. (2009) What is mode? In: JewittC. (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge, 54–67.
13.
KressG. (2010) Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
14.
KressG.Van LeeuwenT. (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
15.
KressGVan LeeuwenT. (2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd edn.London: Routledge.
16.
LaskeyH.DayECraskM. (1989) Typology of main message strategies for television commercials. Journal of Advertising18(1): 36–41.
17.
PutoC.WellsW. (1984) Informational and transformational advertising: The differential effects of time. Advances in Consumer Research11(1): 638–643.
18.
StigelJ. (2001) The aesthetics of Danish TV-spot-commercials: A study of Danish TV commercials in the 1990s. In: HansenFHansenLY (eds) Advertising Research in the Nordic Countries. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, 327–350.
19.
Van LeeuwenT. (2005) Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
20.
WangA. (2011) Branding over internet and TV advertising. Journal of Promotion Management17(3): 275–290.
21.
ZigmondD.StippH. (2010) Assessing a new advertising effect: Measurement of the impact of television commercials on internet search queries. Journal of Advertising Research50(2): 162–168.
