This article presents a kindergarten science inquiry as an exemplar for the purpose of suggesting an analytic graphic that is visually inclusive of the multimodal resources brought to bear by children and teachers engaged in classroom interaction. The central aim is the visual representation of the analysis so that the analysis itself becomes visual communication, a means of generating knowledge about multimodal discourse. This makes the discourse structure much more accessible to viewers than a verbal transcript. Findings demonstrate that the children and teacher carried out activity that reflected generally mismatched classroom discourses. The children engaged in the science processes of observation, interpretation, and design of the investigation while the teacher focused on the social process of classroom management. Visual communication is central in helping researchers and teachers to visually associate the elements and structure of interactions so that teaching response can be designed.
Alexander, C. (2002) `Book One: The Phenomenon of Life', in The Nature of Order: An Essay on the Art of Building and the Nature of the Universe. Berkeley, CA: Center for Environmental Structure.
2.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1968) Science: A Process Approach. Lexington, MA: Ginn.
3.
Bogdan, R.C. and Biklen, S.K. (1982) Qualitative Research for Education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
Britsch, S.J. (2002) Beyond Stories: Young Children's Nonfiction Composition . Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education .
5.
Britsch, S.J. (2005a) `The Multimodal Mediation of Power in the Discourses of Preschool Story Designers', TEXT25(3): 305-40.
6.
Britsch, S.J. (2005b) `A Visual Model for Discourse Analysis', paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Association of Visual Literacy, Orlando, FL, October.
7.
Britsch, S., Chang, S. and Bymaster, C. (2007) `Micro/Macro: Two Approaches to the Visual Analysis of Multimodal Classroom Discourse', paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April.
8.
Cassell, J. et al. (2001) `Non-Verbal Cues for Discourse Structure' , Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Toulouse, July, pp. 106-15.
9.
Corsaro, W.A. (1985) Friendship and Peer Culture in Early Years. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10.
Crang, M. and Thrift, N. (eds) (2000) Thinking Space. London: Routledge.
11.
Diessel, H. (1999) Demonstratives: Form, Function and Grammaticalization . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12.
Dondis, D. (1973) A Primer of Visual Literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
Fillmore, C.J. (1975) Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
14.
Flewitt, R. (2006) `Using Video to Investigate Preschool Classroom Interaction: Education Research Assumptions and Methodological Practices' , Visual Communication5(1): 25-50.
15.
Goodwin, C. (2001) `Practices of Seeing Visual Analyses: An Ethnomethodological Approach', in T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt (eds) Handbook of Visual Analysis , pp. 157-82. London: Sage.
16.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) A Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
17.
Hodge, R. and Kress, G. (1988) Social Semiotics. Cambridge : Polity Press.
18.
Hoffer, P.C. (2003) Sensory Worlds in Early America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
Jewitt, C. and Kress, G. (eds) (2003) Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
20.
Jewitt, C. and Oyama, R. (2001) `Visual Meaning: A Social Semiotic Approach', in T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt (eds) Handbook of Visual Analysis, pp. 134-56. London : Sage.
21.
Katz, S.D. (1991) Film Directing Shot by Shot: Visualizing from Concept to Screen. Studio City, CA: Michael Weise Productions.
22.
Kendon, A. (2004) Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Kozulin, A. (1990) Vygotsky's Psychology: A Biography of Ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
25.
Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd edn. London: Routledge .
26.
Kress, G. et al. (2001) Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. London: Continuum.
27.
Maienschein, J. (1998) `Scientific Literacy', Science281: 917.
28.
Marquez, C., Izquierdo, M. and Espinet, M. (2006) `Multimodal Science Teachers' Discourse in Modeling the Water Cycle'. URL (consulted 15 Feb. 2007): www.interscience.wiley.com
29.
Martinec, R. (2001) `Interpersonal Resources in Action', Semiotica135(1/4): 117- 45.
30.
McKee, R. (1997) Story: Substance, Structure, Style and the Principles of Screenwriting. New York: Regan Books.
31.
Norman, D.A. (1993) Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
32.
Norman, D.A. (2002[1988]) The Design of Everyday Things . New York: Basic Books.
33.
Norris, S. (2004) Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge.
34.
Palmer, G.B. (1996) Toward a Theory of Cultural Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.
35.
Pink, S. (2006) The Future of Visual Anthropology: Engaging the Senses. London: Routledge.
36.
Plowman, L. and Stephen, C. (2008) `The Big Picture? Video and the Representation of Interaction', British Educational Research Journal34(4): 541-65.
37.
Prosser, J. and Loxley, A. (2007) `Enhancing the Contribution of Visual Methods to Inclusive Education', Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs7(1): 55-68.
38.
Rose, G. (2001) Visual Methodologies. London : Sage.
39.
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S.W. (2003) Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World . London: Routledge.
40.
Shaw-Miller, S. (2002) Visible Deeds of Music: Art and Music from Wagner to Cage. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
Sheets, H. (2006) `Close Reading: Military Maneuvers with Computer and Color', The New York Times, 5 March: 28.
42.
Shepardson, D.P. and Britsch, S.J. (2006) `Zones of Interaction: Differential Access to Elementary Science Discourse', Journal of Research in Science Teaching43(5): 443-66.
43.
de Saint-Georges, I. (2004) `Materiality in Discourse: The Influence of Space and Layout in Making Meaning', in P. LeVine and R. Scollon (eds) Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis, pp. 71-87. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
44.
Sterne, J. (2003) The Audible Past: Cultural Origins of Sound Reproduction . Durham, NC: Duke University Press .
45.
Strickland, R. (2003) `Spontaneous Cinema as Design Practice: How to Walk without Watching your Step', in B. Laurel (ed.) Design Research: Methods and Perspectives, pp. 118-28. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. and Luria, A.R. (1993[1930]) `Studies on the History of Behavior: Ape, Primitive, and Child', ed. and trans. V.I. Golod and J.E. Knox.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
Wallschlaeger, C. and Busic-Snyder, C. (1992) Basic Visual Concepts and Principles for Artists, Architects, and Designers. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
49.
Wertsch, J. (1998) Mind as Action. New York: Oxford University Press.
