This study explores the effectiveness of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) in developing intercultural understanding among university students. A 2-year COIL project, ‘Linguistic and Cultural Diversity Across Contexts’, was implemented between universities in Catalonia (Spain) and Poland, involving 49 students from Special Education and Inclusive Education programmes. Using a humanising methodology, this qualitative study collected data through initial interviews, narrative reflections and focus groups. Findings highlight the benefits of COIL, including enhanced intercultural awareness, positive impact on learners’ self-perceived communication competence and empathy. However, challenges such as language anxiety, task design limitations and resistance to new methodologies among students were also identified. The study contributes to the research on COIL with a focus on students’ perspectives, underscoring the potential of COIL to foster intercultural understanding and inclusivity in higher education.
AndersonA. M.OrJ. (2024). Fostering intercultural effectiveness and cultural humility in adult learners through collaborative online international learning. Adult Learning, 35(3), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/10451595231182447
2.
AnzaiY.ShimizuH. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of COIL for foreign language education. International Journal for Educational Media and Technology, 16(2), 46–54. https://www.ijemt.org/index.php/journal/article/view/289
3.
ArndtS.Madrid AkpovoS.TesarM.HanT.HuangF.HalladayM. (2021). Collaborative online learning across borders (COLAB): Examining intercultural understandings of preservice teachers in a virtual cross-cultural university-based program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 35(2), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2021.1880994
4.
BaraltM. (2011). Coding qualitative data. In MackeyA.GassS. M. (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 222–244). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444347340.ch12
5.
BarkhuizenG.BensonP.ChikA. (2014). Narrative inquiry in language teaching and learning research. Routledge.
6.
CaluianuD. (2019). When more is less: Unexpected challenges and benefits of telecollaboration. In TurulaA.KurekM.LewisT. (Eds.), Telecollaboration and virtual exchange across disciplines: In service of social inclusion and global citizenship (pp. 7–13). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2019.35.934
7.
Collaborative Online International Learning. (2023). SUNY COIL: Collaborative Online International Learning – Center for Collaborative Online International Learning. https://coil.suny.edu/
8.
CoombsP. H.AhmedM. (1974). Attacking rural poverty: How nonformal education can help. Johns Hopkins University Press.
9.
DeardorffD. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002
Garizurieta-BernabeJ.PrakaschandraR. (2024). Using the COIL pedagogy as a strategy for improving the virtual international educational experiences of students: North–South hemisphere case study. Active Learning in Higher Education, 26(2), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874241256620
12.
GuamguamiM.R’boulH. (2022). Creating intercultural communicative competence through virtual collaboration. In BirchB. M. (Ed.), Creating classrooms of peace in English language teaching (pp. 176–193). Routledge.
13.
GuimarãesF. F.FinardiK. R. (2021). Global citizenship education (GCE) in internationalisation: COIL as alternative Thirdspace. Globalisation Societies and Education, 19(5), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1875808
14.
GuimarãesF. F.Macedo MendesA. R.Mendes RodriguesL.Dos Santos PaivaR. S.FinardiK. R. (2019). Internationalization at home, COIL and intercomprehension: For more inclusive activities in the Global South. Simon Fraser University Educational Review, 12(3), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.21810/sfuer.v12i3.1019
15.
HackettS.JanssenJ.BeachP.PerreaultM.BeelenJ.van TartwijkJ. (2023). The effectiveness of collaborative online international learning (COIL) on intercultural competence development in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00373-3
16.
JohnstonD.LópezI. (Eds.). (2022). The Wiley handbook of collaborative online learning and global engagement. Wiley-Blackwell.
17.
Keeney-KennicuttW.Baris GunerselA.SimpsonN. (2008). Overcoming student resistance to a teaching innovation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2008.020105
18.
KučerováK. (2023). Benefits and challenges of conducting a collaborative online international learning class (COIL). International Journal on Studies in Education, 5(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.110
19.
LockleyT. (2013). Exploring self-perceived communication competence in foreign language learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2013.3.2.3
20.
MacIntyreP.ClémentR.DörnyeiZ.NoelsK. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x
21.
MaguireM.DelahuntB. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 9(3), 3351–3364. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335
22.
MezirowJ. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. Jossey-Bass.
23.
Müller-HartmannA. (2016). A task is a task is a task is a task. . . or is it? Researching telecollaborative teacher competence development – the need for more qualitative research. In JagerS.KurekM.O’RourkeB. (Eds.), New directions in telecollaborative research and practice: Selected papers from the Second Conference on Telecollaboration in Higher Education
(pp. 31–43). Research-publishing.net.
O’DowdR.WaireP. (2009). Critical issues in telecollaborative task design. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220902778369
26.
Pardo KuklinskiH.CoboC. (2020). Expandir la universidad más allá de la enseñanza remota de emergencia: Ideas hacia un modelo híbrido post-pandemia. Outliers School.
27.
ParisD. (2011). ‘A friend who understand fully’: Notes on humanizing research in a multiethnic youth community. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.495091
28.
ParisD.WinnM. (Eds.). (2014). Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. Sage.
29.
RemmerswaalR.TuncerH.NavalJ. (2025). The impact of COIL on EFL learners’ communication confidence and soft skills. The JALT CALL Journal, 21(1), 20–10. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v21n1.2010
30.
ReyesC. C.HainesS. J.ClarkK. (2021). Humanizing methodologies in educational research: Centering non-dominant communities. Teachers College Press.
WaddingtonJ. (2025). Questioning the native speaker construct in teacher education: Enabling multilingual identities and decolonial language pedagogies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003188896
