This study investigated the impact of collaborative notetaking on student comprehension in a Gender and Women’s Studies (GWST) course, bridging gaps in the literature on interdisciplinary pedagogical strategies. Grounded in Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development and feminist pedagogy, the research adopted a mixed-methods approach to explore how collaborative notetaking influences learning outcomes; specifically, student comprehension. Quantitative data, collected through pre- and post-tests of course content, revealed a significant improvement in students’ comprehension scores (M = 74.47% to M = 92.25%, p < .001, d = 1.32), showing the efficacy of the intervention. Complementary qualitative insights from student reflections on collaborative notetaking suggests that mechanisms of task division and role differentiation, active engagement and peer support, and conflict resolution underlied dynamics that fostered gains in students’ comprehension of the course content. The findings align with GWST’s (as an interdisciplinary field) emphasis on inclusivity, dialog, and critical engagement, demonstrating how collaborative notetaking supports feminist pedagogical principles by valuing shared authority and diverse voices. This small study contributes to the growing body of research on active learning by providing empirical evidence of the benefits of collaborative notetaking in interdisciplinary settings. Future research should explore its applicability across disciplines and its long-term effects on comprehension, including how individual and contextual factors modulate its effectiveness.
BarkleyE. F.MajorC. H.CrossK. P. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
2.
BerkovitchN.PoutiatineM. I. (2020). Ethical considerations in the use of research participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940692092074. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940692092074
3.
BonwellC. C.EisonJ. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC higher education reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, The George Washington University.
4.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
5.
BrookfieldS. D. (2017). Becoming a critically reflective teacher (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
6.
BrunvandS. (2017). Facilitating student interaction and collaboration in a MOOC environment. In Mendoza-GonzalezR. (Ed.),User-centered design strategies for massive open online courses (MOOCs) (pp. 1–14). IGI Global.
7.
CavanaghM. (2011). Students’ experiences of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 23–33.
8.
ChenP. H.TeoT.ZhouM. (2017). Effects of guided notes on enhancing college students’ lecture note-taking quality and learning performance. Current Psychology, 36, 719–732.
9.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK. (2017). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
10.
CostaP. L.PassosA. M.BakkerA. B. (2014). Team work engagement: A model of emergence. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 87(2), 414–436.
11.
CostleyJ.FanguyM. (2021). Collaborative note-taking affects cognitive load: The interplay of completeness and interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 655–671.
12.
CourtneyM.CostleyJ.BaldwinM.LeeK.FanguyM. (2022). Individual versus collaborative note-taking: Results of a quasi-experimental study on student note completeness, test performance, and academic writing. The Internet and Higher Education, 55, Article 100873.
13.
CrabtreeR. D.SappD. A.LiconaA. C. (2009). Feminist pedagogy. Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
CreswellJ. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
15.
De DreuC. K. W.WeingartL. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741–749.
16.
De WeldeK.FooteN.HayfordM.RosenthalM. (2013). Team teaching “gender perspectives”: A reflection on feminist pedagogy in the interdisciplinary classroom. Feminist Teacher, 23(2), 105–125.
17.
DenzinN. K. (2012). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
18.
FanguyM.BaldwinM.ShmelevaE.LeeK.CostleyJ. (2023). How collaboration influences the effect of note-taking on writing performance and recall of contents. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4057–4071.
19.
FinlayL. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: The opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative research, 2(2), 209–230.
FlickU. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
22.
FreemanS.EddyS. L.McDonoughM.SmithM. K.OkoroaforN.JordtH.WenderothM. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 111(23), 8410–8415.
23.
FreethR.CanigliaG. (2020). Learning to collaborate while collaborating: Advancing interdisciplinary sustainability research. Sustainability Science, 15(1), 247–261.
24.
FreethR.VilsmaierU. (2020). Researching collaborative interdisciplinary teams: Practices and principles for navigating researcher positionality. Science & Technology Studies, 33(3), 57–72.
25.
FukushimaK.BourrierK. (2020). Inside Digital Dinah Craik: Feminist pedagogy, cognitive apprenticeship, and the TEI. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative, 12.
26.
HackmanJ. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Harvard Business Review Press.
27.
HanrahanH. M.DewittA. L.BrasherS. M. (2016). Gender, confinement, and freedom: Team teaching introduction to women’s studies. Feminist Teacher, 26(2-3), 95-114.
28.
HartC. E.ColonnaS. E. (2021). Feminist space invaders. The Radical Teacher, 119, 21–29.
29.
hooksb. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
30.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (2013). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (11th ed.). Pearson.
31.
KasimovnaK. G. (2024). Theory of collaborative learning in the history of pedagogical teachings. International Journal of Pedagogics, 4(5), 37–41.
MarzanoR. J. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. ASCD.
34.
MatongoM.GorongaP. (2025). Embracing collaborative learning: Innovative teaching methods at tertiary level. In Burris-MelvilleT.BurrisS. (Eds.), Developing effective and high-performing teams in higher education (pp. 187–216). IGI Global.
35.
MichaelsenL. K.KnightA. B.FinkL. D. (2004). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Stylus Publishing.
36.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
37.
MooreB.BoardmanA. G.SmithC.FerrellA. (2019). Enhancing collaborative group processes to promote academic literacy and content learning for diverse learners through video reflection. Sage Open, 9(3), 2158244019861480.
38.
PeaR. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In SalomonG. (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). Cambridge University Press.
39.
PlaueC.LaMarcaS.FunkS. H. (2012, February29–March3). Group note-taking in a large lecture class [Conference session]. 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Raleigh, United States (pp. 227–232).
40.
PrinceM. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
41.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE Publications Limited.
42.
TuckmanB. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.
43.
VassE.LittletonK. (2010). Peer collaboration and learning in the classroom. In LittletonK.WoodC.Kleine StaarmanJ. (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education (pp. 105–135). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
44.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
45.
WalkerA. J. (1996). Cooperative learning in the college classroom. Family Relations, 45, 327–335.
