Flipped classroom structures are increasingly prevalent in higher education and facilitating student preparation is a necessary ingredient to maximize effectiveness of the approach. This research expanded upon a yearlong pilot study comparing two types of accountability homework in flipped and traditionally structured first year master’s level healthcare classrooms. Outcome measures included perceived learning, satisfaction, and usefulness of concept maps (CM) versus question-answer-rationale (QAR) homework. Study sample (n = 77) participants were randomly assigned to either CM or QAR homework group for a period of 4 weeks. Then, participants completed the alternate homework type for a subsequent 4 weeks. Findings indicated that perceived learning, satisfaction, and usability of the method was significantly greater in the CM group as compared to the QAR group in both traditional and flipped classrooms. The use of accountability homework assignments is discussed for both classroom types.
AdnanM. (2017). Perceptions of senior-year ELT students for flipped classroom: A materials development course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(3–4), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1301958
2.
AlomariS.AbdullahS. (2019). Improving an AI-based algorithm to automatically generate concept maps. Computer and Information Science, 12(4), 72. https://doi.org/10.5539/cis.v12n4p72
3.
AlqurashiE. (2018). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
4.
BaconD. R. (2016). Reporting actual and perceived student learning in education research. Journal of Marketing Education, 38(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475316636732
5.
BaligaS.WalvekarP.MahantshettiG. (2021). Concept map as a teaching and learning tool for medical students. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_146_20
6.
BassettK.OlbrichtG. R.ShannonK. B. (2020). Student preclass preparation by both reading the textbook and watching videos online improves exam performance in a partially flipped course. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 19(3), ar32. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-05-0094
7.
BayoumyH. M. M.AlsayedS. (2021). Investigating relationship of perceived learning engagement, motivation, and academic performance among nursing students: A multisite study. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 12, 351–369. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S272745
8.
BaytiyehH.NajaM. K. (2017). Students’ perceptions of the flipped classroom model in an engineering course: A case study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 1048–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1252905
9.
BembenuttyH.WhiteM. C. (2013). Academic performance and satisfaction with homework completion among college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.013
10.
BergmannJ.SamsA. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
11.
BergmannJ.SamsA. (2014). Flipped learning: Gateway to student engagement. International Society for Technology in Education.
12.
CarpenterS. K.WilfordM. M.KornellN.MullaneyK. M. (2013). Appearances can be deceiving: Instructor fluency increases perceptions of learning without increasing actual learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 1350–1356. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0442-z
13.
Carr-LopezS. M.GalalS. M.VyasD.PatelR. A.GnesaE. H. (2014). The utility of concept maps to facilitate higher-level learning in a large classroom setting. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(9), 170. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe789170
14.
CastroM. D. B.TumibayG. M. (2021). A literature review: Efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institutions using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1367–1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z
15.
ChanC. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
16.
ChengL.RitzhauptA. D.AntonenkoP. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7
17.
ChoudhariS. G.GaidhaneA. M.DesaiP.SrivastavaT.MishraV.ZahiruddinS. Q. (2021). Applying visual mapping techniques to promote learning in community-based medical education activities. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02646-3
18.
DeslauriersL.McCartyL. S.MillerK.CallaghanK.KestinG. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
19.
DosaniA.LindC.LoewenS. (2019). Concept mapping: An innovative tool to teach critical community health nursing using the example of population health promotion. Witness: The Canadian Journal of Critical Nursing Discourse, 1(2), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.25071/2291-5796.29
20.
EntezariM.JavdanM. (2016). Active learning and flipped classroom, hand in hand approach to improve students learning in human anatomy and physiology. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(4), 222. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n4p222
21.
EvansL.Vanden BoschM. L.HarringtonS.SchoofsN.CoviakC. (2019). Flipping the classroom in health care higher education: A systematic review. Nurse Educator, 44(2), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000554
22.
FoltynekT.BjelobabaS.GlendinningI.KhanZ. R.SantosR.PavleticP.KravjarJ. (2023). ENAI recommendations on the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4
23.
GopikaJ. S.RekhaR. V. (2025). Awareness and use of digital learning before and during COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Reform, 34(4), 754–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879231173389
HarrisN.BaconC. E. W. (2019). Developing cognitive skills through active learning: A systematic review of health care professions. Athletic Training Education Journal, 14(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.4085/1402135
26.
HewK. F.BaiS.HuangW.DawsonP.DuJ.HuangG.JiaC.ThankritK. (2021). On the use of flipped classroom across various disciplines: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6475
27.
HwangG.YinC.ChuH. (2019). The era of flipped learning: Promoting active learning and higher order thinking with innovative flipped learning strategies and supporting systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 991–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1667150
IsraelC.ZippG. P.D’AbundoM.DelucaD. (2020). Mind mapping to enhance critical thinking skills in physician assistant education: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Allied Health, 49(2), 135–140.
31.
JaafarpourM.AazamiS.MozafariM. (2016). Does concept mapping enhance learning outcomes of nursing students?Nurse Education Today, 36, 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.029
32.
JungE.LimR.KimD. (2022). A schema-based instructional design model for self-paced learning environments. Education Sciences, 12(4), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040271
33.
KalyugaS. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need?Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7
KayeM. P.KimB. K. (2023). Promoting student success in the flipped online classroom: Learning and accountability through homework strategies. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 7(1), 1–32. https://encompass.eku.edu/jote/vol7/iss1/10
36.
KeenanH. L.DukeS. L.WharradH. J.DoodyG. A.PatelR. S. (2022). Usability: An introduction to and literature review of usability testing for educational resources in radiation oncology. Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology, 24, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.09.001
37.
LågT.SæleR. G. (2019). Does the flipped classroom improve student learning and satisfaction? A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Educational Research Association Open, 5(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419870489
38.
LaiC.-L.HwangG.-J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
39.
MadirajuC.Tellez-CorralesE.HuaH.StecJ.NauliA. M.BrownD. M. (2020). Analysis of student perceptions of just-in-time teaching pedagogy in pharmd microbiology and immunology courses. Frontiers in Immunology, 11, 351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00351
40.
MayerR. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
41.
MindMup (2024). MindMup2: Zero-friction online mind mapping [Computer software]. https://app.mindmup.com/
MukhtarK.JavedK.AroojM.SethiA. (2020). Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(S4), S27–S31. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2785
44.
MusniS. M.GarrettB. (2021). Flipped classroom versus classroom lecture: A content mapping study in undergraduate nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 60(11), 629–632. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20210913-05
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Postbaccalaureate enrollment. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved May 31, 2022, from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/chb
47.
NesbitJ. C.AdesopeO. O. (2013). Concept maps for learning. InSchrawG.McCruddenM. T.RobinsonD. (Eds.), Learning through Visual Displays (pp. 303–328). Information Age Publishing.
48.
NicholesJ. (2020). Predictors of engagement and success in a flipped EFL classroom in China. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 17(1), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.56040/juni1724
49.
NouriJ. (2016). The flipped classroom: For active, effective and increased learning – Especially for low achievers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0032-z
50.
PerskyA. M.LeeE.SchlesselmanL. S. (2020). Perception of learning versus performance as outcome measures of educational research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(7), ajpe7782. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7782
51.
PorterS. R. (2013). Self-reported learning gains: A theory and test of college student survey response. Research in Higher Education, 54(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9277-0
52.
RangaJ. S. (2020). Factors influencing student learning in semi-flipped general chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(8), 2130–2139. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01165
53.
RapantaC.BotturiL.GoodyearP.GuàrdiaL.KooleM. (2021). Balancing technology, pedagogy and the new normal: Post-pandemic challenges for higher education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 715–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1
54.
RobertsonB.FlowersM. J. (2020). Determining the impact of lecture videos on student outcomes. Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2020.130203
55.
RudlandJ. R.JayeC.TweedM.WilkinsonT. J. (2021). Relationships among perceived learning, challenge and affect in a clinical context. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02574-2
56.
StokhofH.de VriesB.BastiaensT.MartensR. (2019). Mind map our way into effective student questioning: A principle-based scenario. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9625-3
57.
StrelanP.OsbornA.PalmerE. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314
58.
SwellerJ. (2020). Cognitive load theory. InTindall-FordS.AgostinhoS.SwellerJ. (Eds.), Advances in cognitive load theory (pp. 1–11). Routledge.
59.
VazquezJ.ChiangE. (2016). Preparing students for class: A clinical trial testing the efficacy between multimedia pre-lectures and textbooks in an economics course. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 13(2), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v13i2.9631
60.
Walck-ShannonE. M.RowellS. F.FreyR. F. (2021). To what extent do study habits relate to performance?CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(1), ar6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-05-0091
61.
WebbM.DomanE. (2016). Does the flipped classroom lead to increased gains on learning outcomes in ESL/EFL contexts?The CATESOL Journal, 28(1), 39–67.
62.
WutT.XuJ. (2021). Person-to-person interactions in online classroom settings under the impact of covid-19: A social presence theory perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(3) 371–383.
63.
WynterL.BurgessA.KalmanE.HeronJ. E.BleaselJ. (2019). Medical students: What educational resources are they using?BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1462-9
ZaidiN. L. B.GrobK. L.MonradS. M.KurtzJ. B.TaiA.AhmedA. Z.GruppenL. D.SantenS. A. (2018). Pushing critical thinking skills with multiple-choice questions: Does Bloom’s Taxonomy work?Academic Medicine, 93(6), 856–859. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002087
66.
Zawacki-RichterO.MarínV. I.BondM.GouverneurF. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators?International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
67.
ZhuL.LianZ.EngströmM. (2020). Use of a flipped classroom in ophthalmology courses for nursing, dental and medical students: A quasi-experimental study using a mixed-methods approach. Nurse Education Today, 85, 104262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104262
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
