Only a handful of research papers have examined the assessment of student debate activities in higher education, and very little is currently known about how students might perceive a final oral exam in which they have to debate with/against each other. The aim of this study was to examine students’ perceptions of participation and learning in debate classes, and of an aligned final exam, which was a debate-based oral group exam. A survey design was used to collect data from 98 university students who participated in such an exam, and a mixed methods convergent design was used to integrate quantitative and qualitative survey data. The exam format was found to be broadly acceptable to students and to be associated with higher levels of active participation and positively perceived learning and training in voluntary debate classes, but students called for extra attention to the scaffolding of quality debates.
AlénE.DomínguezT.de CarlosP. (2015). University students’ perceptions of the use of academic debates as a teaching methodology. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 16, 15–21.
2.
AndersonE.SchianoW. T.SchianoB. (2014). Teaching with cases: A practical guide. Harvard Business Press.
3.
AndradeH. G. (2005). Teaching with rubrics: The good, the bad, and the ugly. College Teaching, 53(1), 27–31.
4.
AngR. X.ChewQ. H.SumM. Y.SenguptaS.SimK. (2019). Systematic review of the use of debates in health professions education–does it work?GMS Journal for Medical Education, 36(4), Doc37.
5.
ArgyropoulouE. (2021). Can “debate” transform teaching and learning in higher education?European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(3), 178–185.
6.
AryD.JacobsL. C.IrvineC. K. S.WalkerD. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.
7.
BergB. (1998). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Allyn and Bacon.
8.
BielingP. J.IsraeliA.SmithJ.AntonyM. M. (2003). Making the grade: The behavioural consequences of perfectionism in the classroom. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(1), 163–178.
9.
BiggsJ.TangC. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. McGraw-Hill Education.
10.
BoveeB. (2016). The impact of collaborative testing on test anxiety. Chiropractic Journal of Australia, 44(3), 214–221.
11.
BrennanR. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. Springer.
12.
BrownZ.WilsonM. (2016). The complexity of in-class debates in Higher Education: Student perspectives on differing designs. Educationalfutures, 7(2), 14–28.
13.
BuehlerM. J.SchneiderL. U. (2009). Speak up! Oral examinations and political science. Journal of Political Science Education, 5(4), 315–331.
14.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage. https://go.exlibris.link/ZnSjvDj4
15.
DarbyM. (2007). Debate: A teaching-learning strategy for developing competence in communication and critical thinking. Journal of Dental Hygiene, 81(4), 78.
16.
DeslauriersL.McCartyL. S.MillerK.CallaghanK.KestinG. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 116(39), 19251–19257.
17.
DoodyO.CondonM. (2012). Increasing student involvement and learning through using debate as an assessment. Nurse Education in Practice, 12(4), 232–237.
18.
DowningS. M.HaladynaT. M. (2004). Validity threats: Overcoming interference with proposed interpretations of assessment data. Medical Education, 38(3), 327–333.
19.
Dy-BoarmanE. A.NislyS. A.CostelloT. J. (2018). It’s no debate, debates are great. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 10–13.
20.
EfuS. I. (2019). Exams as learning tools: A comparison of traditional and collaborative assessment in higher education. College Teaching, 67(1), 73–83.
21.
EloS.KyngäsH. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
22.
FieldS.JonesL. (2011, n.d). Enhancing student employability. The role of simulation and oral assessment strategies [Conference session]. Partnerships. Articles from the Learning and Teaching Conference 2010, Learning and Teaching Conference, Brighton, UK. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/188251331.pdf#page=26
23.
GreenwaldA. R. (2007). Learning how to argue: Experiences teaching the Toulmin model to composition students. Iowa State University.
24.
HandayaniR. (2016). Students critical thinking skills in a classroom debate. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 19(2), 132–140.
25.
HoodS.BarrickmanN.DjerdjianN.FarrM.MagnerS.RoychowdhuryH.GerritsR.LawfordH.OttB.RossK. (2021). “I like and prefer to work alone”: Social anxiety, academic self-efficacy, and students’ perceptions of active learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(1), ar12.
26.
IrishA.WattsL. (2021). Can 100 students debate one another? Adapting the nuclear proliferation debate for a large lecture class. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 21(10), 23–35.
27.
JoughinG. (2010). A short guide to oral assessment. Leeds Met Press in association with University of Wollongong.
28.
KaneM. T. (2006). Validation. In R. LBrennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 17–64). ACE/Praeger.
29.
KennedyR. R. (2007). In-class debates: Fertile ground for active learning and the cultivation of critical thinking and oral communication skills. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 183–190.
30.
KennedyR. R. (2009). The power of in-class debates. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(3), 225–236.
31.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
32.
MachemerP. L.CrawfordP. (2007). Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 9–30.
33.
NashG.CrimminsG.OprescuF. (2016). If first-year students are afraid of public speaking assessments what can teachers do to alleviate such anxiety?Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(4), 586–600.
34.
NorciniJ.AndersonM. B.BollelaV.BurchV.CostaM. J.DuvivierR.HaysR.Palacios MackayM. F.RobertsT.SwansonD. (2018). 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment. Medical Teacher, 40(11), 1102–1109.
35.
NurakhirA.PalupiF. N.LangeveldC.NurmaliaD. (2020). Students’ views of classroom debates as a strategy to enhance critical thinking and oral communication skills. Nurse Media Journal of Nursing, 10(2), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v10i2.29864
36.
OmelichevaM. Y. (2007). Resolved: Academic debate should be a part of political science curricula. Journal of Political Science Education, 3(2), 161–175.
37.
OrosA. L. (2007). Let’s debate: Active learning encourages student participation and critical thinking. Journal of Political Science Education, 3(3), 293–311.
38.
PandeyC.KapitanoffS. (2011). The influence of anxiety and quality of interaction on collaborative test performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(3), 163–174.
39.
PeasahS. K.MarshallL. L. (2017). The use of debates as an active learning tool in a college of pharmacy healthcare delivery course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9(3), 433–440.
40.
PekrunR.GoetzT.PerryR. P.KramerK.HochstadtM.MolfenterS. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the Test Emotions Questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 17(3), 287–316.
41.
PostareffL.VirtanenV.KatajavuoriN.Lindblom-YlänneS. (2012). Academics’ conceptions of assessment and their assessment practices. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(3–4), 84–92.
RoyA.MacchietteB. (2005). Debating the issues: A tool for augmenting critical thinking skills of marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(3), 264–276.
44.
SmithC. V.CardaciottoL. (2011). Is active learning like broccoli? Student perceptions of active learning in large lecture classes. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 53–61.
45.
SpaskaA. M.SavishchenkoV. M.KomarO. A.MaidanykO. V. (2021). Enhancing analytical thinking in tertiary students using debates. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 879–889.
46.
StrayC. (2001). The shift from oral to written examination: Cambridge and Oxford 1700–1900. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 8(1), 33–50.
47.
SwansonE.McCulleyL. V.OsmanD. J.Scammacca LewisN.SolisM. (2019). The effect of team-based learning on content knowledge: A meta-analysis. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 39–50.
48.
TanC. P.HowesD.TanR. K.DanczaK. M. (2022). Developing interactive oral assessments to foster graduate attributes in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1183–1199.
49.
TurjamaaR.HynynenM.-A.MikkonenI.YlinenE.-R. (2018). Dialogic oral exam in nursing education: A qualitative study of nursing students’ perceptions. Nurse Education in Practice, 29, 53–58.
50.
van der VleutenC. P. M. (1996). The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 1(1), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00596229
51.
VillarroelV.BoudD.BloxhamS.BrunaD.BrunaC. (2020). Using principles of authentic assessment to redesign written examinations and tests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(1), 38–49.
52.
WalkerM.WarhurstC. (2000). ‘In most classes you sit around very quietly at a table and get lectured at. . .’: Debates, assessment and student learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 33–49.
53.
WasonH.SouthallJ. (2016). Using innovative assessment to enhance student engagement and develop critical thinking skills: The case of The Big Debate. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 1(1), 1-9.
54.
WassV.Van der VleutenC.ShatzerJ.JonesR. (2001). Assessment of clinical competence. The Lancet, 357(9260), 945–949.
55.
WelshA. (2012). Exploring undergraduates’ perceptions of the use of active learning techniques in science lectures. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(2), 80–87.
56.
WolskiB. (2009). Beyond mooting: Designing an advocacy, ethics and values matrix for the law school curriculum. Legal Education Review, 19(1), 41–82.
57.
ZareP.OthmanM. (2013). Classroom debate as a systematic teaching/learning approach. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28(11), 1506–1513.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
