The current study investigated the effects of segmentation design and drawing on college students’ video learning. Participants were 158 college students randomly assigned to view either a segmented or continuous video lecture (video type: segmented vs continuous) and who either received instructed to draw while learning or no instructions at all (learning strategy: drawing vs passive viewing). Participants’ eye movements were recorded as they viewed the video, and data was collected regarding their learning satisfaction, cognitive load, both immediate and 7-day delayed learning outcomes, and their perceptions regarding the instructional efficiency of the lectures. The results showed that the drawing activity moderated the segmentation effect in that students did not benefit from the segmented video design when viewing passively, but did when required to draw while viewing. Furthermore, the positive effect of segmentation was mediated by drawing accuracy.
AinsworthSPrainVTytlerR (2011) Science education. Drawing to learn in science. Science333(6046): 1096–7.
2.
AinsworthSEScheiterK (2021) Learning by drawing visual representations: Potential, purposes, and practical implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science30(1): 61–7.
3.
AlemdagE (2022) Effects of instructor-present videos on learning, cognitive load, motivation, and social presence: A meta-analysis. Information Technologies in Education27: 12713–42.
4.
AliAZM (2013) Effects of segmented-animation in projected presentation condition. Journal of Educational Technology & Society16(3): 234–45.
5.
BarbatoGFiccaGMuscettolaG, et al. (2000) Diurnal variation in spontaneous eye-blink rate. Psychiatry Research93(2): 145–51.
6.
BeattyBJMerchantZAlbertM (2019) Analysis of student use of video in a flipped classroom. TechTrends63(4): 376–85.
7.
BiardNCojeanSJametE (2018) Effects of segmentation and pacing on procedural learning by video. Computers in Human Behavior89: 411–7.
8.
BrodG (2021) Generative learning: Which strategies for what age?Educational Psychology Review33(4): 1295–318.
9.
ChengLBealCR (2020) Effects of student-generated drawing and imagination on science text reading in a computer-based learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development68(1): 225–47.
10.
ChermahiniSAHommelB (2010) The (b)link between creativity and dopamine: Spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition115(3): 458–65.
11.
ClossenAS (2018) Trope or trap? Role-playing narratives and length in instructional video. Information Technology and Libraries37(1): 27–38.
12.
De KoningBBTabbersHKRikersRMJP, et al. (2011) Improved effectiveness of cueing by self-explanations when learning from a complex animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology25(2): 183–94.
13.
DoolittlePEBryantLHChittumJR (2015) Effects of degree of segmentation and learner disposition on multimedia learning. British Journal of Educational Technology46(6): 1333–43.
14.
FiorellaL (2022) Multimedia learning with instructional video. In: MayerREFiorellaL (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 3rd edn.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 487–497.
FiorellaLStullATKuhlmannS, et al. (2020) Fostering generative learning from video lessons: Benefits of instructor-generated drawings and learner-generated explanations. Journal of Education & Psychology112(5): 895–906.
17.
FiorellaLZhangQ (2018) Drawing boundary conditions for learning by drawing. Educational Psychology Review30(3): 1115–37.
18.
HayesAF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: Guilford Publications, pp 77–109.
19.
HayesAFRockwoodNJ (2020) Conditional process analysis: Concepts, computation, and advances in the modeling of the contingencies of mechanisms. American Behavioral Scientist64(1): 19–54.
20.
HellenbrandJMayerREOpfermannM, et al. (2019) How generative drawing affects the learning process: An eye-tracking analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology33(6): 1147–64.
21.
HongJPiZYangJ (2018) Learning declarative and procedural knowledge via video lectures: Cognitive load and learning effectiveness. Innovations in Education and Teaching International55(1): 74–81.
22.
JansenBJJungSSalminenJ, et al. (2017) Viewed by too many or viewed too little: Using information dissemination for audience segmentation. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology54(1): 189–96.
23.
Johnson-LairdPN (1983) Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness (No. 6). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
24.
KayRH (2012) Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior28(3): 820–831.
25.
KrugerJLDohertyS (2016) Measuring cognitive load in the presence of educational video: Towards a multimodal methodology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology32(6): 19–31.
26.
LardiCLeopoldC (2022) Effects of interactive teacher-generated drawings on students’ understanding of plate tectonics. Instructional Science50(2): 273–302.
27.
LeopoldCSumflethELeutnerD (2013) Learning with summaries: Effects of representation mode and type of learning activity on comprehension and transfer. Learning and Instruction27: 40–9.
28.
LinLLeeCHKalyugaS, et al. (2017) The effect of learner-generated drawing and imagination in comprehending a science text. Journal of Experiential Education85(1): 142–54.
29.
MaffeiAAngrilliA (2018) Spontaneous eye blink rate: An index of dopaminergic component of sustained attention and fatigue. International Journal of Psychophysiology123: 58–63.
30.
MasonLLoweRTornatoraMC (2013) Self-generated drawings for supporting comprehension of a complex animation. Contemporary Educational Psychology38(3): 211–24.
31.
MayerRE (2009) Multimedia Learning, 2nd edn.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
MayerREPilegardC (2014) Principles for managing essential processing in multimedia learning: Segmenting, pre-training, and modality principles. In: MayerRE (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 2nd edn.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp.316–45.
33.
MerktMBallmannAFelfeliJ, et al. (2018) Pauses in educational videos: Testing the transience explanation against the structuring explanation. Computers in Human Behavior89: 399–410.
34.
MillerGECohenS (2001) Psychological interventions and the immune system: A meta-analytic review and critique. Health Psychology20(1): 47–63.
35.
MorenoR (2007) Optimising learning from animations by minimising cognitive load: Cognitive and affective consequences of signalling and segmentation methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology21(6): 765–81.
36.
NakanoT (2015) Blink-related dynamic switching between internal and external orienting networks while viewing videos. Neuroscience Research96: 54–8.
37.
O’CallaghanFVNeumannDLJonesL, et al. (2017) The use of lecture recordings in higher education: A review of institutional, student, and lecturer issues. Information Technologies in Education22(1): 399–415.
38.
PaasFAyresP (2014) Cognitive load theory: A broader view on the role of memory in learning and education. Educational Psychology Review26(2): 191–5.
39.
PashlerHBainPMBottgeBA, et al. (2007) Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning. IES Practice Guide. NCER 2007-2004. National Center for Education Research.
40.
PiZZhangYShiD, et al. (2022) Is self-explanation better than explaining to a fictitious student when learning from video lectures?British Journal of Educational Technology53(6): 2012–28.
41.
PiZZhangYZhouW, et al. (2021) Learning by explaining to oneself and a peer enhances learners’ theta and alpha oscillations while watching video lectures. British Journal of Educational Technology52(2): 659–79.
42.
RellensmannJSchukajlowSLeopoldC (2017) Make a drawing. Effects of strategic knowledge, drawing accuracy, and type of drawing on students’ mathematical modelling performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics95(1): 53–78.
43.
SchleinschokKEitelAScheiterK (2017) Do drawing tasks improve monitoring and control during learning from text?Learning and Instruction51: 10–25.
44.
SchmeckA; (nee Schwamborn) (2010) Visualisieren naturwissenschaftlicher Sachverhalte: Der Einsatz von vorgegebenen undselbst generierten Visualisierungen als Textverstehenshilfen beim Lernen aus naturwissenschaftlichen Sachtexten [Visualization of science text content: Using provided and learner-generated visualizations as aids for comprehension in learning from science texts]. PhD thesis, Duisburg-Essen University: Faculty of Education. Available at: https://d-nb.info/1012435024/34 (accessed 3 May 2021).
45.
SchwambornAMayerREThillmannH, et al. (2010) Drawing as a generative activity and drawing as a prognostic activity. Journal of Education & Psychology102(4): 872–9.
46.
SchwambornAThillmannHOpfermannM, et al. (2011) Cognitive load and instructionally supported learning with provided and learner-generated visualizations. Computers in Human Behavior27(1): 89–93.
47.
SmilekDCarriereJSCheyneJA (2010) Out of mind, out of sight: Eye blinking as indicator and embodiment of mind wandering. Psychological Science21(6): 786–9.
48.
SoicherRNBecker-BleaseKA (2020) Testing the segmentation effect of multimedia learning in a biological system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning36(6): 825–37.
49.
SzpunarKKJingHGSchacterDL (2014) Overcoming overconfidence in learning from video-recorded lectures: Implications of interpolated testing for online education. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition3(3): 161–4.
50.
ThompsonLFSebastianelliJDMurrayNP (2009) Monitoring online training behaviors: Awareness of electronic surveillance hinders E-learners. Journal of Applied Social Psychology39(9): 2191–212.
51.
ThompsonPXiuYTsotsorosJ, et al. (2021) The effect of designing and segmenting instructional video. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research20: 173–200.
52.
UesakaYManaloEIchikawaSI (2010) The effects of perception of efficacy and diagram construction skills on students’ spontaneous use of diagrams when solving math word problems. In International Conference on Theory and Application of Diagrams, pp. 197–211. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
53.
van de PolJvan LoonMvan GogT, et al. (2020) Mapping and drawing to improve students’ and teachers’ monitoring and regulation of students’ learning from text: Current findings and future directions. Educational Psychology Review32(4): 951–77.
54.
van GogTPaasF (2008) Instructional efficiency: Revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educational Psychologist43(1): 16–26.
55.
Van MeterPGarnerJ (2005) The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review17(4): 285–325.
56.
van WermeskerkenMRavensbergenSvan GogT (2018) Effects of instructor presence in video modeling examples on attention and learning. Computers in Human Behavior89: 430–8.
57.
WangCFangTGuY (2020) Learning performance and behavioral patterns of online collaborative learning: Impact of cognitive load and affordances of different multimedia. Computers & Education143: 103683.
58.
WeinsteinCEMayerRE (1986) The teaching of learning strategies. In: WittrockM (ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching. New York, NY: Macmillan, pp.315–327.
59.
WittrockMC (1989) Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist24(4): 345–76.
60.
WongALeahyWMarcusN, et al. (2012) Cognitive load theory, the transient information effect and e-learning. Learning and Instruction22(6): 449–57.
61.
YangJZhangYPiZ, et al. (2021) Students’ achievement motivation moderates the effects of interpolated pre-questions on attention and learning from video lectures. Learning and Individual Differences91: 102055.
62.
ZhengHJungELiT, et al. (2022a) Effects of segmentation and self-Explanation designs on cognitive load in instructional videos. Contemporary Educational Technology14(2): ep347.
63.
ZhengHBranchRMDingL, et al. (2022b) The combination of segmentation and self-explanation to enhance video-based learning. Active Learning in Higher Education. Advanced published online. 14697874221126920.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
