The setting, marking and providing feedback on assessments form an important part of a tutor’s role. Studies into the use of feedback and how it is interpreted by students indicate a mismatch between what students are looking for and what tutors think they are giving. Tutors comment that students are more interested in the mark than the feedback, and yet students indicate that they do not get enough feedback or that it is not useful. This study investigates student and staff perceptions of the linking of marking and feedback in face-to-face sessions. A cohort of year 1 university students were given the option of receiving either written feedback or a 15-minute meeting with one of their tutors to have their essay marked with them. In all, 49 students chose face-to-face marking, and the remaining 35 students received written feedback. Focus groups were used to investigate the student experience. Staff members were also asked to reflect on the process. Students and staff found the experience of face-to-face marking beneficial and positive. Both felt that the time spent together allowed for a feedback dialogue about the piece of work and that staff could explain and justify why marks were given.
BaileyRGarnerM (2010) Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education15(2): 187–98.
2.
BarbourR (2007) Doing Focus Groups. London: SAGE.
3.
BlairAMcGintyS (2013) Feedback-dialogues: Exploring the student perspective. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education38(4): 466–76.
4.
BloxhamS (2009) Marking and moderation in the UK: False assumptions and wasted resources. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education34(2): 209–20.
5.
BoudDMolloyE (2013) What is the problem with feedback? In: BoudDMolloyE (eds) Feedback in Higher and Professional Education; Understanding It and Doing It Well. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 1–10.
6.
BrownGTL (2010) The validity of examination essays in higher education: Issues and responses. Higher Education Quarterly64(3): 276–91.
7.
BrymanA (2012) Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
CarlessD (2006) Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education31(2): 219–33.
9.
ChemersMHuLGarciaBF (2001) Academic self-efficacy and first year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology93(1): 55–64.
CrimminsGNashGOprescuFet al. (2016) A written, reflective and dialogic strategy for assessment feedback that can enhance student/teacher relationships. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education41: 141–53.
12.
CrispV (2010) Towards a model of the judgement processes involved in examination marking. Oxford Review of Education36(1): 1–21.
13.
DaviesP (2009) Review and reward within the computerised peer-assessment of essays. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education34(3): 321–33.
14.
DowdenTPittawaySYostHet al. (2011) Students’ perceptions of written feedback in teacher education: Ideally feedback is a continuing two-way communication that encourages progress. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education38(3): 1–14.
15.
FergusonP (2011) Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education36(1): 51–62.
16.
GibbsGSimpsonC (2004) Conditions under which assessment supports learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education1: 3–31.
17.
GoodH (1978) Interview marking of examination scripts. Assessment in Higher Education3(2): 122–38.
18.
HarrisJR (2011) Peer assessment in large undergraduate classes: An evaluation of a procedure for marking laboratory reports and a review of related practices. Advances in Physiology Education35(2): 178–87.
19.
HattieJTimperleyH (2007) The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research77(1): 81–112.
JonesOGorraA (2013) Assessment feedback only on demand: Supporting the few not supplying the many. Active Learning in Higher Education14(2): 149–61.
22.
LizzioAWilsonK (2008) Feedback on assessment: Students perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education33(3): 263–75.
23.
McArthurJHuxhamM (2013) Feedback unbound: From master to usher. In: MerrySPriceMCarlessDet al. (eds) Reconceptualising Feedback in Higher Education. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 92–102.
24.
McCullochA (2009) The student as co-producer: Learning from public administration about the student-university relationship. Studies in Higher Education34(2): 171–83.
25.
MacLellanE (2001) Assessment for learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education26(4): 307–18.
26.
MalouffJMEmmertonAJSchutteNS (2013) The risk of a halo bias as a reason to keep students anonymous during grading. Teaching of Psychology40(3): 233–37.
27.
MolloyEBorrell-CarrioFEpsteinR (2013) The impact of emotions in feedback. In: BoudDMolloyE (eds) Feedback in Higher and Professional Education; Understanding It and Doing It Well. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 50–71.
NewsteadSEDennisI (1990) Blind marking and sex bias in student assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education15(2): 132–9.
30.
NicolD (2010) From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education35(5): 501–17.
31.
OrsmondPMerryS (2011) Feedback alignment: Effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of course feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education36(2): 125–36.
32.
PokornyHPickfordP (2010) Complexity, cues and relationships: Student perceptions of feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education11(1): 21–30.
33.
PriceMHandleyKMillarJet al. (2010) Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect?Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education35(3): 277–89.
34.
RobinsonSPopeDHolyoakL (2011) Can we meet their expectations? Experiences and perceptions of feedback in first year undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education383: 260–72.
35.
RustCPriceMO’DonovanB (2003) Improving students’ learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education28(2): 147–64.
36.
SurgenorPWG (2013) Measuring up: Comparing first year students and tutors expectations of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education38(3): 288–302.
37.
TomasC (2014) Marking and feedback provision on essay – based coursework: A process perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education39(5): 611–24.
38.
VarlanderS (2008) The role of students’ emotions in formal feedback situations. Teaching in Higher Education13(2): 145–56.
39.
WeaverMR (2006) Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education31(3): 379–94.
