Attending classes develops an ability in students to understand others’ perspectives and help them to interact with their fellow peers in more adaptive ways. Teacher–student interaction and student–student interaction in a classroom facilitate students’ participation in various class activities, which in turn oblige them to regard human values. The arguments for and against mandatory attendance focus only on the academic performance of students, and not on the value gained from being in the classroom, itself. A study was conducted among 160 college students. The result showed that students attending at least 40% of their classes were most likely to endorse human values in comparison to students attending fewer classes.
Bar-talYBar-talD (1990) Social psychological analysis of classroom interaction. In: FeldmanRS (ed.) The Social Psychology of Education. Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, pp. 132–133.
CavanaghM (2011) Students’ experience of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education12(1): 23–33.
4.
CheruvalathR (2012) Academic failure of first-year engineering and technological students in India and assessment of motivation factors – a case study. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice18(3): 283–97.
5.
CheruvalathR (2015) Teaching ethics to engineering students in India: Issues and challenges. In: SethySS (ed.) Contemporary Ethical Issues in Engineering. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 121–132.
6.
CredeMSylviaGRUrszulaMK (2010) Class attendance in college – A meta-analytic review of the relationship of class attendance with grades and student characteristics. Review of Educational Research80(2): 272–95.
7.
CollinsonV (2012) Sources of teachers’ values and attitudes. Teacher Development: An International Jounral of Teachers’ Professional Development16(3): 321–44.
8.
DedeY (2006) Mathematics educational values of college students’ towards function concept. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education2(1): 82–91.
9.
DeeleyS (2014) Summative co-assessment –A deep learning approach to enhancing employability skills and attributes. Active Learning in Higher Education15(1): 39–51.
10.
DhaliwalU (2003) Absenteeism and under-achievement in final year medical students. National Medical Journal of India16(1): 34–7.
11.
DiPadova-StocksLN (2015) Higher education shaping the unscripted future: The imperative to affirm human values in transformative times. In: Dailey-HerbertDennis (eds) Transformative Perspectives and Processes in Higher Education, Advances in Business Education and Training. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 211–231.
12.
DoehlerSPLauzonVF (2015) Documenting change across time: Longitudinal and cross-sectional CA studies of classroom interaction. In: MarkeeN (ed.) The Handbook of Classroom Discourse and Interaction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 410–411.
13.
ErnestWBDavidNB (2005) Professor’s role in motivating students to attend class. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education42(3): 1–13.
14.
FitzpatrickJCroninKByrneE (2011) Is attending lectures still relevant in engineering education?European Journal of Engineering Education36(3): 301–12.
15.
GravellsA (2010) Delivering Employability Skills in the Lifelong Learning Sector. Exeter: Learning Matters.
16.
GumpSE (2006) Guess who’s (not)coming to class: Student attitudes as indicators of attendance. Educational Studies32(1): 39–46.
17.
HansenDTBurdick-ShepherdSCammaranoC. (2009) Education, values, and valuing in cosmopolitan perspective. Curriculum Inquiry39(5): 587–612.
18.
HariRKujalaMV (2007) Brain basis of human social interaction: From concepts to brain imaging. Physiological Reviews89(2): 453–79.
19.
HassanienA (2011) A qualitative student evaluation of group learning in higher education. Higher Education in Europe32(2–3): 135–50.
20.
HughesSJ (2005) Student attendance during college-based lectures: A pilot study. Nursing Standard19(47): 41–9.
21.
JackelMRovekampCWurfelAM (2006) Beyond digital connectivity: The value of communicaiton and the communication of values. Produciton Planning and Control: The Management of Operations17(2): 214–23.
22.
KaiserHF (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika39: 31–6.
23.
KernanJ BSommersMS (1967) Meaning, value, and the theory of promotion. Journal of Communication7(2): 109–35.
24.
KnightPYorkeM (2003) Assessment, Learning and Employability. London: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
25.
LaszloE (2007) A systems philosophy of human values. System Research and Behavioural Science18(4): 250–9.
MassinghamPHerringtonT (2006) Does attendance matter? An examination of student attitudes, participation, performance and attendance. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice3(2): 82–103.
28.
MazerJP (2013) Student emotional and cognitive interest as mediators of teacher communication behaviors and student engagement: An examination of direct and interaction effects. Communication Education62(3): 253–77.
29.
MischoC (2005) Promoting perspective coordination by dilemma discussion. The effectiveness of classroom group discussion on interpersonal negotiation strategies of 12-year old students. Social Psychology of Education8(1): 41–63.
30.
MoralesMR (2007) Attitudes and values in engineering students: The human development scale. In: Proceedings of the international conference on engineering education – ICEE 2007, Coimbra, 3–7 September.
31.
NancyF (2005) Students’ motivation for class attendance. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education69(1): 107–12.
32.
NatasaPTheoW (2012) The role of teachers in inculcating moral values: Operationalisation of concepts. Journal of Beliefs & Values33(1): 55–69.
33.
ParkKHKerrPM (1990) Determinants of academic performance: A multinomial logit approach. Journal of Economic Education21(2): 101–11.
34.
PerryLGToddCR (2008) Addressing the moral quandary of contemporary universities: Rejecting a less than human moral education. Journal of Beliefs & Values29(2): 113–23.
35.
RobbinsSBLauverKLeH. (2004) Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin130(2): 261–88.
RugarciaAFelderRMWoodsDR. (2000) The future of engineering education – A vision for a new century. Chemical Engineering Education34(1): 16–25.
38.
SchmidtRM (1983) Who maximizes what? A study in student time allocation. American Economic Review73(2): 23–8.
39.
SchraderDE (2004) Intellectual safety, moral atmosphere, and epistemology in college classrooms. Journal of Adult Development11(2): 87–101.
40.
SchwartzSH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: ZannaM (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 25, 1–65.
StancaL (2010) The effects of attendance on academic performance: Panel data evidence for introductory microeconomics. Journal of Economic Education37(3): 251–66.
43.
VaughanRPWalkerM (2012) Capabilities, values and education policy. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities13(3): 495–512.
44.
VesilindPA (1988) Rules, ethics and morals in engineering education. Engineering Education78(5): 289–93.
45.
WadesangoNMachingambiS (2011) Causes and structural effects of student absenteeism: A case study of three South African universities. Journal of Social Science26(2): 89–97.
