This quasi-experimental study reports on the effectiveness of three assessment strategies for students’ performance. The primary goal was to determine whether there are any improvements in students’ conceptual learning when a frequent (weekly) quiz is used for grading purposes compared to using midterm and final examinations only. Another goal was to ascertain whether students perform better when they are allowed to work collaboratively on quizzes compared to students taking quizzes individually. The results showed that when the quizzes are open-book, and students have a chance to collaborate (discuss in pairs how to answer the quiz questions), they perform significantly higher in their final examinations and their final projects (an indicator of conceptual learning).
AgarwalPRoedigerHL (2011) Expectancy of an open-book test decreases performance on a delayed closed-book test. Memory19(8): 836–52.
2.
AgarwalPKarpickeJKangS. (2008) Examining the testing effect with open- and closed-book tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology22(7): 861–76.
3.
BaconDR (2005) The effect of group projects on content-related learning. Journal of Management Education29(2): 248–67.
4.
Bangert-DrownsRLKulikJAKulikCC (1991) Effects of frequent classroom testing. The Journal of Educational Research85(2): 89–99.
5.
BaşolGJohansonG (2009) Effectiveness of frequent testing over achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Human Sciences6(2): 99–121.
6.
BillingtonR (1994) Effects of collaborative test taking on retention in eight third-grade mathematics classes. The Elementary School Journal95(1): 23–32.
7.
BlockR (2012) A discussion of the effect of open-book and closed-book exams on student achievement in an introductory statistics course. PRIMUS22(3): 228–38.
8.
BloomD (2006) Collaborative testing: A second chance to learn. Academic Exchange Quarterly10(3): 265–9.
9.
BoudD (1990) Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education15(1): 185–200.
10.
DallmerD (2004) Collaborative test taking with adult learners. Adult Learning15(3–4): 4–7.
11.
FellerM (1994) Open-book testing and education for the future. Studies in Educational Evaluation20(2): 235–8.
12.
GharibAPhillipsWMathewN (2012) Cheat sheet or open-book? A comparison of the effects of exam types on performance, retention, and anxiety. Psychology Research2(8): 469–78.
13.
GibbsGSimpsonC (2003) Does your assessment support your students’ learning?Learning and Teaching in Higher Education1(1): 3–31.
14.
HamakerC (1986) The effects of adjunct questions on prose learning. Review of Educational Research56(2): 212–42.
15.
HurrenBLRutledgeMGavrinAB (2006) Team testing for individual success. Phi Delta Kappan87(6): 443–7.
16.
KennettDJYoungAMBerrillDP (1999) Is cooperative learning effective for high achieving entrance students? Implications for policy and teaching resources. Journal of Research and Development in Education33(1): 27–35.
17.
KikaFMMcLaughlinTFDixonJ (1992) Effects of frequent testing of secondary algebra students. Journal of Educational Research85(3): 159–62.
18.
KrarupNNaeraaNOlsenC (1974) Open-book tests in a university course. Higher Education3(2): 157–64.
19.
MarshEJSinkHE (2010) Access to handouts of presentation slides during lecture: Consequences for learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology24(5): 691–706.
20.
NicolDJMacfarlane-DickD (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education31(2): 199–218.
21.
PatilBM (2012) Comparative study of open book exam and close book exam for VIIth Std. Golden Research Thoughts2(6): 1–3.
22.
PhelpsRP (2012) The effect of testing on student achievement, 1910–2010. International Journal of Testing12(1): 21–43.
23.
PokornyHPickfordP (2010) Complexity, cues and relationships: Student perceptions of feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education11(1): 21–30.
24.
PuncocharJMFoxPW (2004) Confidence in individual and group decision making: When “two heads” are worse than one. Journal of Educational Psychology96(3): 582–91.
25.
RaceP (2008) Make Learning Happen: A Guide for Post-Compulsory Education. London: SAGE.
26.
RaverSAMaydoszAS (2010) Impact of the provision and timing of instructor-provided notes on university students’ learning. Active Learning in Higher Education11(3): 189–200.
27.
RezaeiARLovornM (2010) Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing. Assessing Writing15(1): 18–39.
28.
RussoAWarrenSH (1999) Collaborative test taking. College Teaching47(1): 18–21.
29.
RustC (2002) The impact of assessment on student learning: How can the research literature practically help to inform the development of departmental assessment strategies and learner-centered assessment practices?Active Learning in Higher Education3(2): 145–58.
30.
StalnakerJMStalnakerRC (1934) Open-book examinations. The Journal of Higher Education5(3): 117–20.
WesterkampACHeijne-PenningaMKuksJBMCohen-SchotanusJ (2013). Open-book tests: Search behavior, time used and test scores. Medical teacher4: 330-332.
33.
WilliamsJBWongA (2009) The efficacy of final examinations: A comparative study of closed-book, invigilated exams and open-book open-Web exams. British Journal of Educational Technology40(2): 227–36.
