This study focuses on comparing the results of self-, peerand teacher-assessment of
student essays, as well as on exploring students' experiences of the self-
and peer-assessment processes. Participants were 15 law students. The scoring matrix
used in the study made assessment easy, according to both teachers and students
alike. Self-assessment was sometimes considered difficult, because the students felt
it impossible to be objective when considering their own work. In peer-assessment,
the students found it difficult to be critical when assessing the essay of a peer.
The students found it easier to assess technical aspects of the essays when compared
to aspects related to content.
BIGGS, J.
(1999) Teaching for Quality Learning at University.
Buckingham: Open University Press
.
2.
BIRENBAUM, M.
&
DOCHY, F.
(1996) Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning
Processes and Prior Knowledge.
Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers
.
3.
BOUD, D.
(1992)
‘The Use of Self-assessment Schedules in Negotiated Learning’
, Studies in Higher Education17(2):
185–201
.
4.
BOUD, D.
(1995) Enhancing Learning Through Self-Assessment.
London: Kogan Page
.
5.
BROWN, G.
,
BULL, J.
&
PENDLEBURY, M.
(1997) Assessing Students' Learning in Higher
Education.
London: Routledge
.
6.
BUCHY, M.
&
QUINLAN, K.
(2000)
‘Adapting the Scoring Matrix: A Case Study of Adapting
Disciplinary Tools for Learning Centred Evaluation’
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education25(1):
81–91
.
7.
DAVID, T.
,
PATEL, L.
,
BURDETT, K.
&
RANGACHARI, P.
(1999) Problem-based Learning in Medicine.
Worcester: Royal Society of Medicine Press
.
8.
DOCHY, F.
,
SEGERS, M.
&
SLUIJSMANS, D.
(1999)
‘The Use of Self-, Peer- and Coassessment in Higher Education: A Review’
, Studies in Higher Education24(3):
331–351
.
9.
FALCHIKOV, N.
&
BOUD, D.
(1989)
‘Student Self-assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-analysis'
, Review of Educational Research59(3):
395–430
.
10.
GALE, K.
,
MARTIN, K.
&
MCQUEEN, G.
(2002)
‘Triadic Assessment’
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education27(6):
557–567
.
11.
GOLDFINCH, J.
(1994)
‘Further Developments in Peer Assessment of Group Projects'
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education19(1):
29–35
.
12.
GULIKERS, J.
,
BASTIENS, T.
&
KIRSCHNER, P.
(2004)
‘A Five-Dimensional Framework for Authentic Assessment’
, Educational Technology Research and Development52(3):
67–86
.
13.
HANRAHAN, S.
&
ISAACS, G.
(2001)
‘Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The Students'Views'
, Higher Education Research & Development20(1):
53–70
.
14.
LEJK, M.
&
WYVILL, M.
(2001)
‘The Effect of the Inclusion of Self-assessment with
Peer-assessment of Contributions to a Group Project: A Quantitative Study of
Secret and Agreed Assessments'
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education26(6):
551–561
.
15.
LINDBLOM-YLƒNNE, S.
&
LONKA, K.
(2001)
‘Students' Perceptions of Assessment Practices in a
Traditional Medical Curriculum’
, Advances in Health Sciences Education6(2):
121–140
.
16.
MACKENZIE, L.
(2000)
‘Occupational Therapy Students as Peer Assessors in Viva Examinations'
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education25(2):
135–147
.
17.
MACLELLAN, E.
(2004)
‘How Convincing is Alternative Assessment for Use in Higher Education?’Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education29(3):
311–321
.
18.
MAGIN, D.
&
HELMORE, P.
(2001)
‘Peer- and Teacher-assessment of Oral Presentation Skills: How
Reliable Are They?’Studies in Higher Education26(3):
287–298
.
19.
MILLER, P.
(2003)
‘The Effect of Scoring Criteria Specificity on Peer and Self-assessment’
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education28(4):
383–394
.
20.
ORSMOND, P.
,
MERRY, S.
&
REILING, K.
(1996)
‘The Importance of Marking Criteria in Peer Assessment’
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education21(3):
239–249
.
21.
ORSMOND, P.
,
MERRY, S.
&
REILING, K.
(1997)
‘A Study in Self-assessment: Tutor and Students'
Perceptions of Performance Criteria’
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education22(4):
357–369
.
22.
ORSMOND, P.
,
MERRY, S.
&
REILING, K.
(2000)
‘The Use of Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self Assessment’
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education25(1):
23–38
.
23.
ORSMOND, P.
,
MERRY, S.
&
REILING, K.
(2002)
‘The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback when Using Student
Derived Marking Criteria in Peer- and Self-assessment’
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education27(4):
309–323
.
24.
POPE, N.
(2001)
An Examination of the Use of Peer Rating for Formative Assessment in the
Context of the Theory of Consumption Values'
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education26(3):
235–246
.
25.
RUST, C.
,
PRICE, M.
&
O’DONOVAN, B.
(2003)
‘Improving Students' Learning by Developing their
Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Process'
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education28(2):
147–164
.
26.
SAVIN-BADEN, M.
(2000) Problem-based Learning in Higher Education: Untold
Stories.
Buckingham: The Society for Resesarch into
Higher Education & Open University Press
.
27.
SEGERS, M.
&
DOCHY, F.
(2001)
‘New Assessment Forms in Problem-based Learning: The Value Added
of the Students' Perspective’
, Studies in Higher Education26(3):
327–343
.
28.
SEGERS, M.
,
DOCHY, F.
&
CASCALLAR, E.
(2003) ‘The Era of Assessment Engineering:
Changing Perspectives on Teaching and Learning and the Role of New Modes of
Assessment’, in
M. Segers
,
F. Dochy
and
E. Cascallar
(eds) Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and
Standards, pp. 1–12.
Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
.
29.
SEGERS, M.
,
DOCHY, F.
,
VAN DEN BOSSCHE, P.
&
TEMPELAAR, D.
(2001)
‘The Quality of Co-assessment in a Problem-based Curriculum’
. Paper presented at the 9th Conference of European Association
for Research on Learning and Instruction, 28
August–1 September at Fribourg, Switzerland.
30.
SLUIJSMANS, D.
,
BRAND-GRUWEL, S.
&
MERRIÀNBOER, J.
(2002)
‘Peer Assessment Training in Teacher Education: Effects on
Performance and Perceptions'
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education27(5):
443–454
.
31.
TARAS, M.
(2001)
‘The Use of Tutor Feedback and Student Self-assessment in
Summative Assessment Tasks: Towards Transparency for Students and for Tutors'
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education26(5):
605–614
.
32.
TOPPING, K.
(2003) ‘Self- and Peer-assessment in School and
University: Reliability, Validity and Utility’, in
M. Segers
,
F. Dochy
and
E. Cascallar
(eds) Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and
Standards, pp. 55–87.
Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
.
33.
TOPPING, K.
,
SMITH, E.
,
SWANSON, I.
&
ELLIOT, A.
(2000)
‘Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between
Postgraduate Students'
, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education25(2):
149–169
.
34.
ZOLLER, U.
&
BEN-CHAIM, D.
(1997)
‘Student Self-assessment in HOCS Science Examinations: Is it
Compatible with that of Teachers?’
Paper presented at the 7th EARLI conference,
Athens, Greece, 26–30 August.
