This article reports on a small-scale study of feedback on music students’
written work, in which staff and students were asked to evaluate existing practice
and suggest potential modifications. The value of feedback as a communicative
learning tool is illustrated through students’ participation in a range of
research tasks, including rating the usefulness of existing feedback comments and
attempting to generate their own. The study shows that challenges in developing
practice apply even where changes sought are far from radical, and conclusions are
drawn which suggest ways forward for practice and research in giving feedback.
BLOM, D.
&
POOLE, K.
(2004)
‘Peer Assessment of Tertiary Music Performance: Opportunities for
Understanding Performance Assessment and Performing through Experience and Self-reflection’
, British Journal of Music Education21(1):
111-125
.
2.
BROWN, S.
&
KNIGHT, P.
(1994) Assessing Learners in Higher Education.
London: Kogan Page
.
3.
CHANOCK, K.
(2000)
‘Comments on Essays: Do Students Understand What Tutors Write?’
, Teaching in Higher Education5(1):
95-105
.
4.
CHARMAZ, K.
(1995) ‘Grounded Theory’, in
J. A. Smith
,
R. Harré
&
L. V. Langenhove
(eds) Rethinking Methods in Psychology, pp.
27-49.
London: SAGE
.
5.
CHENG, W.
&
WARREN, M.
(2000)
‘Making a Difference: Using Peers to Assess Individual
Students’ Contributions to a Group Project’
, Teaching in Higher Education5(2):
243-255
.
6.
COHEN, L.
&
MANION, L.
(1994) Research Methods in Education (4th
edn).
London: Routledge
.
7.
DANIEL, R.
(2004)
‘Peer Assessment in Musical Performance: The Development, Trial
and Evaluation of a Methodology for the Australian Tertiary Environment’
, British Journal of Music Education21(1):
89-110
.
8.
HIGGINS, R.
(2000)
‘“59% - Excellent!” Making Sense of
Assessment Feedback’
. Paper presented at ILTAC 2000:
www.ilt.ac.uk/iltac2000/Higgins/Higgins.rtf (accessed 4 February 2003).
9.
HIGGINS, R.
,
HARTLEY, P.
&
SKELTON, A.
(2001)
‘Getting the Message Across: The Problems of Communicating
Assessment Feedback’
, Teaching in Higher Education6(2):
270-274
.
10.
HIGGINS, R.
,
HARTLEY, P.
&
SKELTON, A.
(2002)
‘The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the Role of Assessment
Feedback in Student Learning’
, Studies in Higher Education27(1):
53-64
.
11.
HYLAND, F.
(2003)
‘Focusing on Form: Student Engagement with Teacher Feedback’
, System31:
217-230
.
12.
O ’NEILL, S. A.
&
SLOBODA, J.
(1997)
‘The Effects of Failure on Children’s Ability to
Perform a Musical Test’
, Psychology of Music25(1):
18-34
.
13.
PITTS, S. E.
(2002)
‘Changing Tunes: Musical Experience and Self-perception amongst
School and University Music Students’
, Musicae Scientiae6(1):
73-90
.
14.
ROBSON, C.
(1993) Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists
and Practitioner-Researchers.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
15.
SADLER, D. R.
(1983)
‘Evaluation and the Improvement of Academic Learning’
, Journal of Higher Education54(1):
60-79
.
16.
SMART, J.
&
DIXON, S.
(2002)
‘The Discourse of Assessment: Language and Value in the
Assessment of Group Practice in the Performing Arts’
, Arts and Humanities in Higher Education1(2):
185-204
.
17.
SOUTHWORTH, K.
(1999)
‘What Do Students Really Really Want? (And Should We Give It to Them?)’
. Paper presented at the Humanities and Arts in Higher Education
Network Conference:
iet.open.ac.uk/research/herg/han/1999/southworth.pdf [accessed 9 December 2002].
18.
WELLINGTON, J.
(1996) Methods and Issues in Educational Research.
Sheffield: University of Sheffield Division of Education
.
19.
YORKE, M.
(2000)
‘A Cloistered Virtue? Pedagogical Research and Policy in UK
Higher Education’
, Higher Education Quarterly54(2):
106-126
.
20.
YOUNG, P.
(2000)
‘“I Might as Well Give Up”: Self-esteem and
Mature Students’ Feelings about Feedback on Assignments’
, Journal of Further and Higher Education24(3):
409-418
.
