Bloom’s work stressed the importance of cognitive entry behaviors to a large extent. In this article, we give an overview of the conceptual advances that have been made during the past decades concerning the outdated term ‘cognitive entry behaviors’. Moreover, we search for further evidence in research that will highlight from different perspectives the great importance that Bloom assumed for this factor in learning situations. Explanations for the influence of prior knowledge on learning are reviewed. Finally, some short comments are made concerning Bloom’s work in relation to new educational developments, educational practice, and teaching.
ALEXANDER, P. A.
(1992) ‘Domain Knowledge: Evolving Issues and Emerging Concerns’, Educational Psychologist27: 33–51.
2.
ALEXANDER, P. A.
& JUDY, J. E. (1988) ‘The Interaction of Domain-Specific and Strategic Knowledge in Academic Performance’, Review of Educational Research58: 375–404.
3.
ALEXANDER, P. A.
& KULIKOWICH, J. M. (1992) Learning from Physics Text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, San Francisco.
4.
ALEXANDER, P. A.
, KULIKOWICH, J. M. & SCHULZE, S. K. (1992) How Subject-Matter Knowledge Affects Recall and Interest. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, San Francisco.
5.
ALEXANDER, P. A.
, PATE, E. P., KULIKOWICH, J. M., FARRELL, D. M. & WRIGHT, N. L. (1989) ‘Domain-Specific and Strategic Knowledge: Effects of Training on Students of Differing Ages or Competence Levels’, Learning and Individual Differences1: 283–325.
6.
ALEXANDER, P. A.
, SCHALLERT, D. L. & HARE, V. C. (1991) ‘Coming to Terms: How Researchers in Learning and Literacy Talk About Knowledge’, Review of Educational Research61: 315–343.
7.
ANDERSON, J. R.
(1980) Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. San Francisco: Freeman.
8.
ANDERSON, J. R.
& REDER, L. M. (1979) ‘An Elaborative Processing Explanation of Depth of Processing’, in S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (eds) Levels of Processing in Human Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
ANDERSON, R. C.
& PICHERT, J. W. (1978) ‘Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior17: 1–12.
10.
ANDERSON, R. C.
, REYNOLDS, R. E., SCHALLERT, D. L. & GOETZ, E. T. (1977) ‘Frameworks for Comprehending’, American Educational Research Journal14: 367–381.
11.
ANDERSON, R. C.
, PICHERT, J. W. & SHIREY, L. L. (1983) ‘Effects of the Reader’s Schema at Different Points in Time’, Journal of Educational Psychology75: 271–279.
12.
ARTER, J.
(1997) ‘Using Assessment as a Tool for Learning’, in R. Blum & J. Arter (eds) Student Performance Assessment in an Era of Restructuring. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
13.
AUSUBEL, D. P.
(1960) ‘The Use of Advance Organizers in the Learning and Retention of Meaningful Verbal Material’, Journal of Educational Psychology51: 267–272.
14.
AUSUBEL, D. P.
(1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
15.
BERMAN, J. S.
, READ, S. J. & KENNY, D. A. (1983) ‘Processing Inconsistent Social Information’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45: 1211–1224.
16.
BIRENBAUM, M.
& DOCHY, F. (1996) Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes and Prior Knowledge. Boston: Kluwer.
17.
BLACK, P.
& WILIAM, D. (1999) Assessment for Learning: Beyond the Black Box. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, School of Education.
18.
BLOOM, B. S.
(1976) Human Characteristics and School Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
BRANSFORD, J. D.
(1979) Human Cognition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
20.
BRANSFORD, J. D.
, NITSCH, K. W. & FRANKS, J. J. (1977) ‘Schooling and the Facilitation of Knowing’, in R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro & W. E. Montague (eds) Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
BYRNES, J. P.
& GUTHRIE, J. T. (1992) ‘Prior Knowledge and Textbook Search’, Contemporary Educational Psychology17: 8–29.
22.
CAREY, S.
(1985) Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
CHAN, C. K. K.
, BURTIS, P. J., SCARDAMALIA, M. & BEREITER, C. (1992) ‘Constructive Activity in Learning from Text’, American Educational Research Journal29(1): 97–118.
24.
CHASE, W. G.
& SIMON, H. A. (1973) ‘Perception in Chess’, Cognitive Psychology4: 55–81.
25.
CHI, M. T.
, GLASER, R. & REES, E. (1982) ‘Expertise in Problem Solving’, in R. J. Sternberg (ed.) Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
CHIESI, H. L.
, SPILICH, G. J. & VOSS, J. F. (1979) ‘Acquisition of Domain Related Information in Relation to High and Low Domain Knowledge’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior18: 257–273.
27.
COHEN, G.
(1983) The Psychology of Cognition. New York: Academic Press.
28.
CROWDER, R. G.
(1976) Principles of Learning and Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
DE CORTE, E.
(1990) ‘Acquiring and Teaching Cognitive Skills: A State-of-the-Art of Theory and Research’, in P. J. Drenth, J. A. Sergeant & R. J. Takens (eds) European Perspectives in Psychology(Vol. 1). London: Wiley.
30.
DOCHY, F. J. R. C. (1988a) The Prior Knowledge State of Students and its Facilitating Effect on Learning. OTIC Research Report 1.2. Heerlen: Center for Educational Technology and Innovation.
31.
DOCHY, F. J. R. C. (1988b) Variables Influencing the Indexation of the ‘Prior Knowledge State’ Concept and a Conceptual Model for Research. Research Report 2.2.Heerlen: Centre for Educational Technology and Innovation.
32.
DOCHY, F. J. R. C.
(1990a) ‘Instructional Implications of Recent Research and Empirically Based Theories on the Effect of Prior Knowledge on Learning’, in J. M. Pieters, K. Breuer & P. R. J. Simons (eds) Learning Environments. Recent Research in Psychology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
33.
DOCHY, F. J. R. C. (1990b) Mapping Prior Knowledge or Expertise. OTIC Research Report 28. Heerlen: Centre for Educational Technology and Innovation.
34.
DOCHY, F. J. R. C.
(1992) Assessment of Prior Knowledge as a Determinant for Future Learning: The Use of Knowledge State Tests and Knowledge Profiles. Utrecht/London: Lemma B.V./Jessica Kingsley.
35.
DOCHY, F. J. R. C.
(1995) ‘Investigating the Use of Knowledge Profiles in a Flexible Learning Environment: Analysing Students’ Prior Knowledge States’, in S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte & H. Mandal (eds) Psychological and Educational Foundations of Technology-Based Learning Environments. NATO ASI Series F, Special Program AET. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
36.
DOCHY, F. J. R. C.
(1996). ‘Assessment of Domain-Specific and Domain-Transcending Prior Knowledge: Entry Assessment and the Use of Profile Analysis’, in M. Birenbaum & F. J. R. C. Dochy (eds) Alternatives of Assessment in Achievements, Learning Process and Prior Learning. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
37.
DOCHY, F. J. R. C.
(1997) ‘A Line of Argument for Innovation in Teaching and Assessment Starting from Students’ Conceptions and Misconceptions in Learning Processes’, European Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension3: 231–241.
38.
DOCHY, F. J. R. C.
& ALEXANDER, P. A. (1995) ‘Mapping Prior Knowledge: A Framework for Discussion Among Researchers’, European Journal for Psychology of Education10(1): 123–145.
39.
DOCHY, F. J. R. C.
& MCDOWELL, L. (1997) ‘Assessment as a Tool for Learning’, Studies in Educational Evaluation23: 279–298.
40.
DOCHY, F. J. R. C.
& MOERKERKE, G. (1997) ‘The Present, the Past and the Future of Achievement Testing and Performance Assessment’, International Journal of Educational Research27: 415–432.
41.
DOCHY, F. J. R. C.
, SEGERS, M. & BUEHL, M. (1999) ‘The Relation Between Assessment Practices and Outcomes of Studies: The Case of Research on Prior Knowledge’, Review of Educational Research69: 147–188.
42.
DOCHY, F. J. R. C.
, SEGERS, M. & PLETINCKX, J. (2002) ‘The Question of Entry Assessment or How Can We Assess Previously Acquired Knowledge? Main Research Findings and Implications for Practice’, International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning12: 31–44.
43.
DRESEL, M.
, ZIEGLER, A. BROOME & HELLER, K. A. (1998) ‘Gender Differences in Science Education: The Double-Edged Role of Prior Knowledge in Physics’, Roeper Review21(2): 102–107.
44.
ELEN, J.
(1992) Toward Prescriptions in Instructional Design: A Theoretical and Empirical Approach. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven: Faculteit der Psychologie en Pedagogische Wetenschappen, Centrum voor Instructiepsychologie entechnologie.
45.
ENNIS, R.
(1989) ‘Critical Thinking and Subject Specificity’, Educational Researcher18(3): 4–10.
46.
ENNIS, R.
(1990) ‘The Extent to Which Critical Thinking is Subject-Specific: Further Clarification’, Educational Researcher19(4): 13–16.
47.
FLAVELL, J. H.
(1987) ‘Speculation About the Nature and Development of Metacognition’, in F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (eds) Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
GARNER, R.
(1987) Metacognition and Reading Comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
49.
GARNER, R.
(1990) ‘When Children and Adults Do Not Use Learning Strategies: Toward a Theory of Settings’, Review of Educational Research60: 517–529.
50.
GLASER, R.
(1984) ‘Education and Thinking: The Role of Knowledge’, American Psychologist39: 93–104.
51.
GOETZ, E. T.
, SCHALLERT, D. L., REYNOLDS, R. E. & RADIN, D. I. (1983) ‘Reading in Perspective: What Real Cops and Pretend Burglars Look for in a Story’, Journal of Educational Psychology75: 500–510.
52.
HMELO, C. E.
(1998) ‘Problem-based Learning: Effects on the Early Acquisition of Cognitive Skill in Medicine’, Journal of the Learning Sciences7: 173–236.
53.
JOHNSON, W.
& KIERAS, D. (1983) ‘Representation-Saving Effects of Prior Knowledge in Memory for Simple Technical Prose’, Memory and Cognition11: 456–466.
54.
K÷RKEL, J. (1987) Die Entwicklung von Ged‰chtnis und Metaged‰chtnisleistungen in Abh‰ngigkeit von bereichsspezifischen Vorkenntnissen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
55.
LESGOLD, A. M.
, FELTOVICH, P. J., GLASER, R. & WANG, Y. (1981) The Acquisition of Perceptual Diagnostic Skill in Radiology. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.
56.
MATTHEWS, S. R.
(1982) ‘The Impact of Prior Knowledge on Accessibility and Availability on Information From Prose’, in A. Flammer & W. Kintsch (eds) Discourse Processing. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
57.
MAYER, R. E.
(1979) ‘Twenty Years of Research on Advance Organizers’, Instructional Science8: 133–167.
58.
MAYER, R. E.
(1980) ‘Elaboration Techniques that Increase the Meaningfulness of Technical Text: An Experimental Test of the Learning Strategy Hypothesis’, Journal of Educational Psychology72: 770–784.
59.
MINSKY, M.
(1975) ‘A Framework for Representing Knowledge’, in P. H. Winston (ed.) The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.
60.
NEISSER, U.
(1976) Cognition and Reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
61.
O’DONNELL, A. M.
& DANSEREAU, D. F. (2000) ‘Interactive Effects of Prior Knowledge and Material Format on Cooperative Teaching’, The Journal of Experimental Education68(2): 101–118.
62.
PARIS, S. G.
, LIPSON, M. Y. & WIXSON, K. K. (1983) ‘Becoming a Strategic Reader’, Contemporary Educational Psychology8: 293–316.
63.
PARKENSON, J. A.
, LORNAX, R. G., SCHILLER, D. P. & WALBERG, H. J. (1984) ‘Exploring Causal Models of Educational Achievement’, Journal of Educational Psychology76: 638–646.
64.
PHILIPS, J. S.
& LORD, R. G. (1982) ‘Schematic Information Processing and Perceptions of Leadership in Problem-Solving Groups’, Journal of Applied Psychology67: 486–492.
65.
PRAWAT, R. S.
(1989) ‘Promoting Access to Knowledge, Strategy, and Disposition in Students: A Research Synthesis’, Review of Educational Research59: 1–41.
66.
PRESSLEY, M.
, GOODCHILD, F., FLEET, J., ZAJCHOWSKI, R. & EVANS, E. D. (1989) ‘The Challenges of Classroom Strategy Instruction’, Elementary School Journal89: 301–342.
67.
REBER, A. S.
(1989) ‘Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General118: 219–235.
68.
RESNICK, L. B.
(1981) ‘Instructional Psychology’, Annual Review Psychology32: 659–704.
69.
ROTHBART, M.
, EVANS, M. & FULERO, S. (1979) ‘Recall for Confirming Events: Memory Processes and the Maintenance of Social Stereotypes’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology15: 343–355.
70.
ROYER, J. M.
& CABLE, G. W. (1975) ‘Facilitated Learning in Connected Discourse’, Journal of Educational Psychology67: 116–123.
71.
RUMELHART, D. E.
(1975) ‘Notes on a Schema for Stories Representation and Understanding’, in D. G. Brown & A. Collins (eds) Studies in Cognitive Sciences. New York: Academic Press.
72.
RUMELHART, D. E.
(1980) ‘Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition’, in R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (eds) Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
73.
SCHNEIDER, W.
, K÷RKEL, J. & WEINERT, F. E. (1990) ‘Expert Knowledge, General Abilities, and Text Processing’, in W. Schneider & F. E. Weinert (eds) Interactions Among Aptitudes, Strategies, and Knowledge in Cognitive Performance. New York: Springer.
74.
SCHON, D. A.
(1988) ‘Designing: Rules, Types, and Words’, Designing Studies9: 181–190.
75.
SCHWARTZ, D. L.
& BRANSFORD, J. D. (1998) ‘A Time for Telling’, Cognition and Instruction16: 475–522.
76.
SEGERS, M. S. R.
(1997) ‘An Alternative for Assessing Problem-Solving Skills: The Overall Test’, Studies in Educational Evaluation23: 373–398.
77.
SEGERS, M. S. R.
& DOCHY, F. J. R. C. (1996) ‘The Use of Performance Indicators for Quality Assurance in Higher Education’, Studies in Educational Evaluation22: 115–139.
78.
SHAPIRO, A. M.
(1999) ‘The Relationship Between Prior Knowledge and Interactive Overviews During Hypermedia-Aided Learning’, Educational Computing Research20: 143–167.
79.
SHUELL, T. J.
(1986) ‘Cognitive Conceptions of Learning’, Review of Educational Research56: 411–436.
80.
SNOW, R. E.
(1990) ‘New Approaches to Cognitive and Conative Assessment in Education’, International Journal of Educational Research455–473.
81.
SPILLICH, G. J.
, VESONDER, G. T., CHIESI, H. L. & VOSS, J. F. (1979) ‘Text Processing of Domain-related Information for Individuals with High and Low Domain Knowledge’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior18: 275–291.
82.
TOBIAS, S.
(1994) ‘Interest, Prior Knowledge and Learning’, Review of Educational Research64(1): 37–54.
83.
TULVING, E.
& THOMSON, D. M. (1973) ‘Encoding Specificity and Retrieval Processes in Episodic Memory’, Psychological Review80: 352–373.
84.
TUMA, D. T.
& REIF, F. (1980) Problem Solving and Education: Issues in Teaching and Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
85.
VOSS, J. F.
, GREENE, T. R., POST, T. A. & PENNER, B. C. (1983) ‘Problem-Solving Skill in the Social Sciences’, in G. H. Bower (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Academic Press.
86.
WAGEMANS, L. J. J. M.
& DOCHY, F. J. R. C. (1991a) ‘Principles in the Use of Experiential Learning as a Source of Prior Knowledge’, Distance Education12: 85–108.
87.
WAGEMANS, L. J. J. M.
& DOCHY, F. J. R. C. (1991b) ‘Voorkennis en ervaringsleren in het onderwijs voor volwassenen’, Vorming, vaktijdschrift voor volwasseneneducatie en sociaal-cultureel werk6: 223–236.
88.
WALKER, C. H.
(1987) ‘Relative Importance of Domain Knowledge and Overall Attitude on Acquisition of Domain-Related Information’, Cognition and Instruction4: 25–42.
89.
WEINERT, F.
(1989) ‘The Impact of Schooling on Cognitive Development: One Hypothetical Assumption, Some Empirical Results, and Many Theoretical Implications’, EARLI News8: 3–7.
90.
WILLOUGHBY, T.
, PORTER, L., BELSITO, L. & YEARSLEY, T. (1999) ‘Use of Elaboration Strategies by Students in Grades Two, Four and Six’, The Elementary School Journal99: 222–231.
