Uses of Heritage (2006) has been an important contribution to the development of Heritage Studies. Resting on a thorough ‘re-read’ of this modern classic, the article analyses the text applying some central concepts from Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Realism in order to review the arguments put forward. One of the linguistic features from Critical Discourse Analysis we draw on is ‘nominalization’, which refers to replacing verb processes with a noun construction. Re-reading Uses of Heritage and other succeeding publications, it is apparent that the phrase ‘Authorized Heritage Discourse’ is nominalized and reified into an entity obscuring who does what to whom, thereby making the ‘Authorized Heritage Discourse’ a self-evident unit of explanation. Furthermore, the insistence on viewing heritage as a cultural process rather than as ‘things’ is not readably compatible with Critical Realism’s non-reductionist stance. Wrapping up, we nonetheless argue that really taking Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Realism on board could provide a rule of conduct for the future developments of Heritage Studies, where multifarious conceptions of heritage can co-exist.
AbousnnougaGMachinD (2011) The changing spaces of war commemoration: A multimodal analysis of the discourses of British monuments. Social Semiotics21(2): 175–196.
2.
AbousnnougaGMachinD (2013) The Language of War Monuments, Huntingdon: Bloomsbury Publishing.
3.
Abu-KhafajahSAl RabadyRRababehSet al.(2015) Hands-on heritage! Establishing soft authority over heritage through architectural experiment: A case study from Jordan. Public Archaeology14(3): 191–213.
4.
AskewM (2010) The magic list of global status. UNESCO, World Heritage and the agendas of state state. In: LabadiSLoganC (eds) Heritage and Globalisation, London: Routledge, pp. 19–44.
BhaskarR (1986) Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation, London: Verso.
7.
BhaskarR (1989) Reclaiming Reality. A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy, London: Verso.
8.
BhaskarR (2008[1978]) A Realist Theory of Science, London: Routledge.
9.
BhaskarR (2010) Contexts of interdisciplinarity. Interdisciplinarity and climate change. In: BhaskarRFrankCHøyerKGet al.(eds) Interdisciplinarity and Climate Change: Transforming Knowledge and Practice for Our Global Future, London: Routledge, pp. 1–24.
10.
BhaskarR (2012) From Science to Emancipation. Alienation and the Actuality of Enlightenment, London: Routledge.
11.
BhaskarR (2016) Enlightened Common Sense. The Philosophy of Critical Realism, London: Routledge.
12.
BhaskarRDanermarkB (2006) Metatheory, interdisciplinarity and disability research: A critical realist perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research8(4): 278–297.
13.
BilligM (2008) The language of critical discourse analysis: The case of nominalization. Discourse & Society19(6): 783–800.
14.
ChouliarakiLFaircloughN (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
15.
Cleere H (ed) (1989) Archaeological Heritage Management in the Modern World. London: Unwin Hyman.
16.
DicksB (2007) Book review. Laurajane Smith, The uses of heritage. London and New York: Routledge, 2006. Museum and Society5(1): 58–59.
17.
Elder-VassD (2008) Searching for realism, structure and agency in Actor Network Theory. The British Journal of Sociology59(3): 455–473.
18.
EnqvistJ (2014) The new heritage: A missing link between Finnish archaeology and contemporary society?Fennoscandia Archaeologica31: 101–123.
19.
FaircloughN (2000) New Labour, New Language?, London: Routledge.
20.
FaircloughN (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research, London: Routledge.
21.
FaircloughN (2006) Language and Globalization, London: Routledge.
22.
FaircloughN (2008) The language of critical discourse analysis: Reply to Michael Billig. Discourse & Society19(6): 811–819.
23.
FaircloughN (2010a) Critical discourse analysis in researching language in the new capitalism: Overdetermination, transdisciplinarity and textual analysis. In: FaircloughN (ed.) Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language, 2nd edn. Harlow: Longman, pp. 281–300.
24.
FaircloughN (2010b) A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In: FaircloughN (ed.) Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language, 2nd edn. Harlow: Longman, pp. 230–254.
25.
FaircloughNJessopBSayerA (2010) Critical realism and semiosis. In: FaircloughN (ed.) Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language, 2nd edn. Harlow: Longman, pp. 202–222.
26.
FeintuchB (2007) Book review. Uses of heritage. Laurajane Smith. London: Routledge, 2006. Museum Anthropology Review1(2): 181–183.
27.
Gathercole P and Lowenthal D (eds) (1994[1990]) The Politics of the Past. London: Routledge.
28.
GrahamBAshworthGJTunbridgeJE (2000) A Geography of Heritage: Power, Culture and Economy, London: Arnold.
29.
HallidayMAKMatthiessenCMIM (2004) An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Hodder Education.
HartwigM (2007) Dictionary of Critical Realism, London: Routledge.
32.
HarveyDC (2001) Heritage pasts and heritage presents: Temporality, meaning and the scope of heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies7(4): 319–338.
33.
HögbergA (2012) The voice of the authorised heritage discourse. A critical analysis of signs at ancient monuments in Skåne, southern Sweden. Current Swedish Archaeology20: 131–167.
34.
HøyerKGNæssP (2012) Introductory perspectives. In: BhaskarRHøyerKGNæssP (eds) Ecophilosophy in a World of Crisis. Critical Realism and the Nordic Contributions, London: Routledge, pp. 1–8.
35.
JessopB (2016) The symptomatology of crises. Some critical realist reflextions. In: NæssPPriceL (eds) Crisis System. A Critical Realist and Environmental Critique of Economics and the Economy, London: Routledge, pp. 88–108.
36.
Johansson M (2015) Life in a world heritage city. A case study of discussions and contested values in Angra do Heroismo, the Azores. PhD Thesis, Lindköping University, Lindköping.
37.
LarivièreVGingrasYArchambaultÉ (2009) The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology60(4): 858–862.
38.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Layton R (ed) (1989a) Who needs the Past? Indigenous Values and the Past. London: Unwin Hyman.
40.
Layton R (ed) (1989b) Conflict in the Archaeology of Living Traditions. London: Unwin Hyman.
41.
LennonJ (2007) Book review. Uses of heritage. Routledge, Oxford, 2006. Australian Archaeology65: 58–60.
42.
LinkolaH (2015) Administration, landscape and authorized heritage discourse – Contextualising the nationally valuable landscape areas of Finland. Landscape Research40(8): 939–954.
43.
LudwigC (2016) From bricks and mortar to social heritage: Planning space for diversities in the AHD. International Journal of Heritage Studies22(10): 811–827.
44.
MachinD (2013) Introduction. What is multimodal critical discourse studies?Critical Discourse Studies10(4): 347–355.
45.
MachinDMayrA (2012) How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis. A Multimodal Introduction, London: Sage Publications.
46.
MeskellL (2014) States of conservation: Protection, politics, and pacting within UNESCO’s World Heritage Committee. Anthropological Quarterly87(1): 217–243.
47.
MongeonPPaul-HusA (2016) The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics106(1): 213–228.
48.
MydlandLGrahnW (2012) Identifying heritage values in local communities. International Journal of Heritage Studies18(6): 564–587.
49.
NæssP (2012) Kritisk realisme og byplanforskning. FORMakademisk5(2): 1–17.
50.
OlsenB (2010) In Defense of Things. Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects, Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
51.
Parkinson A, Scott M and Redmond D (2016a) Competing discourses of built heritage: Lay values in Irish conservation planning. International Journal of Heritage Studies 22(3): 261–273.
52.
Parkinson A, Scott M and Redmond D (2016b) Defining “official” built heritage discourses within the Irish planning framework: Insights from conservation planning as social practice. European Planning Studies 24(2): 277–296.
53.
PeckJTickellA (2007) Conceptualizing neoliberalism, thinking Thatcherism. In: LeitnerHPeckJSheppardES (eds) Contesting Neoliberalism. Urban Frontiers, New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 26–50.
54.
PendleburyJ (2013) Conservation values, the authorised heritage discourse and the conservation-planning assemblage. International Journal of Heritage Studies19(7): 709–727.
55.
Pétursdóttirþ (2013) Concrete matters: Ruins of modernity and the things called heritage. Journal of Social Archaeology13(1): 31–53.
56.
RichardsonJE (2007) Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
57.
ShennanSJ (1989) Archaeological Approaches to Cultural IdentityVol. 10, London: Unwin Hyman.
58.
SmithL (2004) Archaeological Theory and the Politics of Cultural Heritage, London: Routledge.
59.
SmithL (2006) Uses of Heritage, London: Routledge.
60.
SmithL (2012) Editorial. International Journal of Heritage Studies18(6): 533–540.
61.
SmithLCampbellG (2016) The elephant in the room: Heritage, affect, and emotion. In: LoganWSMáiréadNCKockelU (eds) A Companion to Heritage Studies, Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 443–460.
62.
SolliB (2011a) Reply to comments from Mats Burström, Ewa Domanska, Matt Edgeworth, Alfredo González-Ruibal, Cornelius Holtorf, Gavin Lucas, Terje Oestigaard, Laurajane Smith and Christopher Witmore. Norwegian Archaeological Review44: 78–88.
63.
SolliB (2011b) Some reflections on heritage and archaeology in the Anthropocene. Norwegian Archaeological Review44: 40–54.
64.
ThriftN (2003) Performance and …. Environment and Planning A35(11): 2019–2024.
65.
UckoP (1987) Academic Freedom and Apartheid: The Story of the World Archaeological Congress, London: Duckworth.
66.
UckoP (1994[1990]) Foreword. In: GathercolePLowenthalD (eds) The Politics of the Past, London: Routledge, ix–xxvi.
67.
Warren-FindleyJ (2007) Book review. Uses of heritage, Laurajane Smith. London and New York: Routledge, 2006. Public History Review14: 148–149.
68.
WatertonE (2010) Politics, Policy and the Discourses of Heritage in Britain, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
69.
WatertonESmithLCampbellG (2006) The utility of discourse analysis to heritage studies: The Burra Charter and social inclusion. International Journal of Heritage Studies12(4): 339–355.
70.
WatertonEWatsonS (2013) Framing theory: Towards a critical imagination in heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies19(6): 546–561.
71.
WetherellM (2012) Affect and Emotion. A New Social Science Understanding, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
72.
WinterT (2013) Clarifying the critical in critical heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies19(6): 532–545.
73.
WinterTWatertonE (2013) Critical heritage studies. International Journal of Heritage Studies19(6): 529–531.
74.
WitcombABuckleyK (2013) Engaging with the future of ‘critical heritage studies’: Looking back in order to look forward. International Journal of Heritage Studies19(6): 562–578.
75.
WitmoreC (2014) Archaeology and the new materialisms. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology1(2): 203–246.
76.
WodakRMeyerM (2009) Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage Publications, pp. 1–33.
77.
YanH (2015) World Heritage as discourse: Knowledge, discipline and dissonance in Fujian Tulou sites. International Journal of Heritage Studies21(1): 65–80.
78.
YeungHW-C (1997) Critical realism and realist research in human geography: A method or a philosophy in search of a method?Progress in Human Geography21(1): 51–74.
79.
ZhuY (2016) Heritage making in Lijiang. Governance, reconstruction and local Naxi life. In: BrumannCBerlinerD (eds) World Heritage on the Ground. Ethnographic Perspectives, London: Berghahn, pp. 78–96.
