Michigan Central Station and Roosevelt Park were constructed between 1908 and 1918 as part of Detroit’s City Beautiful Movement. The construction process was a place-making effort designed to implant order on the urban landscape that involved the displacement of a community who represented everything that city planners sought to erase from Detroit’s city center: overcrowding, poverty, immigrants, and transient populations. Current historical archaeological research reveals how the existing ornamental landscape of Roosevelt Park masks the history of a forgotten working-class neighborhood. This synthesis of archival and material evidence details the conditions of life within the neighborhood and of a contentious, decade-long displacement struggle rooted in the inequalities of early-20th-century industrial capitalism. Positioned at the start of a century of controversial urban planning initiatives, the Roosevelt Park case study encourages understandings of displacement as a process that has diachronic and comparative dimensions, both in Detroit and in other urban settings.
BluestoneDM (1988) Detroit’s city beautiful and the problem of commerce. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians47(3): 245–262.
2.
BrightonSA (2001) Prices that suit the times: Shopping for ceramics at the Five Points. Historical Archaeology35(3): 16–30.
3.
BrightonSAOrserC (2006) Irish images on English goods in the American market. In: RussellIA (ed.) Images, Representations and Heritage: Moving Beyond Modern Approaches to Archaeology, New York: Springer, pp. 61–88.
4.
CobbCR (2005) Archaeology and the ‘Savage Slot’: Displacement and emplacement in the premodern world. American Anthropologist107(4): 563–574.
5.
Conger-KanekoJ (2014) A party-owned press: Being the story of this journal and why it is not party-owned. The Coming Nation (formerly The Progressive Woman): A Magazine for the Creators of the New Social Order1(8): 4.
6.
Delle JA, Mrozowski SA and Paynter R (eds) (2000) Lines that Divide: Historical Archaeologies of Race, Class and Gender. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
7.
Demeter CS (1981) An archeological evaluation of the Corktown Study Area. Report for the City of Detroit, Community and Economic Development Department, Detroit, Michigan. Commonwealth Associates, Jackson, Michigan.
8.
Detroit City Directory (1914) Polk: Detroit.
9.
Detroit City Directory (1918) Polk: Detroit.
10.
Detroit Free Press (19 January 1913) Esplanade cost is fixed at $500,000, p 10.
11.
Detroit Free Press (23 April 1909) Buys land for yards: part is said to be site of new depot, p. 1.
12.
Detroit Free Press (2 May 1909) Railroad now large landlord: Some 200 families on site of proposed depot tenants, p. 7.
13.
Detroit Free Press (16 May 1910) Begins work on its new station: Michigan Central takes out first permit for proposed new depot.
14.
Detroit Free Press (25 May 1918) City ‘Out’ rent from park site, p. 9.
15.
Detroit Free Press (27 May 1918) City will raze site buildings: Michigan Central Depot ‘good thing’ to terminate, Officials Assert, p. 9.
16.
Detroit Free Press (11 June 1913) Condemnation begun for M.C. Depot Approach: 300 property owners named in suit, p. 20.
17.
Detroit Free Press (18 June 1918) Detroit will see big tank in action, p. 2.
18.
Detroit Free Press (24 June 1918) Britannia crashes through 3 houses, p. 3.
19.
Detroit Free Press (8 August 1912) Lock horns on new station plan: City Beautifiers and Michigan Central Interests cannot agree on ideas, p. 5.
20.
Detroit Free Press (17 October 1911) Broad Avenue for new depot: Attractive setting to be planned by E.H. Bennett, p. 16.
21.
Detroit Free Press (16 November 1913) M.C. Station is nearly complete: Railroad company rushes work but city delays improvements, p. 6.
22.
Detroit Free Press (5 December 1912) Plan would give city control of esplanade: condemnation of property new Michigan Central Station will give power to council.
23.
Detroit Free Press (17 December 1911) Michigan Central Railway Depot will rank high among Detroit’s finest modern buildings, p. A12.
24.
Detroit Free Press (31 December 1913) How new location of Michigan Central was purchased, p. 8.
25.
Gallagher J (2015) Detroit’s blight-free vision curtailed as money dries up, Detroit Free Press, February 26.
26.
GrooverM (2001) Linking artifact assemblages to household cycles: An example from the Gibbs Site. Historical Archaeology35(4): 38–57.
27.
Holli MG (1981) Reform in Detroit: Hazen S. Pingree and Urban Politics. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press.
28.
HowardJRyzewskiKDubayBR (2015) Artifact preservation and post-depositional site-formation processes in an urban setting: A geoarchaeological study of a 19th-century neighborhood in Detroit, Michigan. Journal of Archaeological Science53: 178–189.
29.
HydeCK (2005) The Dodge Brothers: The Men, the Motor Cars, and the Legacy, Detroit, MI:: Wayne State University Press.
30.
Jazayeri M (2014) Daniell Cell. Paper submitted for ANT5280, Archaeological Field Methods, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
31.
JohnsonMH (1996) An Archaeology of Capitalism, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
32.
KingJ (2006) Household archaeology, identities and biographies. In: HicksDBeaudryMC (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Historical Archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 293–314.
33.
Korth K (2015) Rethinking Standard Narratives: A Documentary Archaeology of Detroit’s Roosevelt Park in the Early 20th Century. MA Essay, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
34.
LeoneMP (1995) A historical archaeology of capitalism. American Anthropologist97: 251–268.
35.
LeoneMP (1999) Setting some terms for historical archaeologies of capitalism. In: LeoneMPPotterPB (eds) Historical Archaeologies of Capitalism, New York: Plenum, pp. 3–22.
36.
McGuireRHWurstL (2002) Struggling with the Past. International Journal of Archaeology6(2): 85–94.
37.
MrozowskiSA (2006) The Archaeology of Class in Urban America, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
MullinsPR (2006) Racializing the commonplace landscape: An archaeology of urban renewal along the color line. World Archaeology38(1): 60–71.
39.
OrserC (1996) A Historical Archaeology of the Modern World, New York: Plenum Press.
40.
Pallas J (2014) Ironstone plate. Paper submitted for ANT5280, Archaeological Field Methods, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
41.
ProssorLLawrenceSBrooksA (2012) Household archaeology, lifecycles and status in a nineteenth-century Australian Coastal Community. International Journal of Historical Archaeology16: 809–827.
42.
ReynoldsHW (1963) Population displacement in urban renewal. American Journal of Economics and Sociology22(1): 113–128.
43.
Rollins JF (ed.) (1920) Development of Detroit’s Public Parks. The Michigan Architect and Engineer 2(1): 90–91.
44.
RothschildNAWallDD (2014) The Archaeology of American Cities, Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
45.
Ryzewski K (2012) Roosevelt Park Archaeological Excavation Report, September–December 2012, Corktown, Detroit. Report on file with the Grosscup Museum of Anthropology, Detroit, Michigan.
46.
RyzewskiK (2014) Ruin photography as archaeological method: A snapshot from Detroit. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology1(1): 36–41.
47.
ShackelPA (2009) The Archaeology of American Labor and Working-Class Life, Gainesville: University of Florida Press.
48.
ShackelPAPalusMM (2006) The gilded age and working-class industrial communities. American Anthropologist108(4): 828–841.
49.
SugrueT (2014) The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit, updated edition, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
50.
The Progressive Woman (1912), May 12, 5(60).
51.
Wilgoren J (2002) Detroit urban renewal without the renewal: houses razed but not replaced. New York Times July 7, 10.
52.
WurstL (1999) Internalizing class in historical archaeology. Historical Archaeology33(1): 7–21.
53.
WurstL (2009) A class all its own: Explorations of class formation and conflict. In: HallMSillimanSW (eds) Historical Archaeology, Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 190–208.
54.
WylieJ (1990) Poletown: Community Betrayed, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
55.
YablonN (2010) Untimely Ruins: An Archaeology of American Urban Modernity, 1819–1919, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56.
YaminR (1998) Lurid tales and homely stories of New York’s notorious Five Points. Historical Archaeology32(1): 74–85.
57.
YaminR (2000) Tales of Five Points: Working-class Life in Nineteenth-Century New York, New York: General Services Administration.
58.
ZunzO (1982) The Changing Face of Inequality: Urbanization, Industrial Development, and Immigrants in Detroit, 1880–1920, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
