This article investigates basic economic categories that are presupposed by archaeologists to connect archaeological data and to explain the sociocultural patterns and processes of change in past societies. Its topical foci are the concepts of exchange, value, and money; its societal focus is the mission period of Alta California; its goal is to use Marx’s concepts of value and money to articulate the concrete archaeological and historical evidence we use to understand the complicated economy of this era.
ArchibaldR (1978) The Economic Aspects of the California Missions, Washington, DC: Academy of American Franciscan History.
2.
ArnoldJ (2001) The Origins of a Pacific Coast Chiefdom: The Chumash of the Channel Islands, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
3.
Arnold J (2010) Dynamics in colonial-era bead making on California’s Channel Islands. Backdirt: Annual Review of the Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA, pp. 44–45.
4.
ArnoldJ (2011) Detecting apprentices and innovators in the archaeological record: The shell bead-making industry of the Channel Islands. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory19(2): 269–305.
5.
ArnoldJGraeschA (2001) The evolution of specialized shellworking among the Island Chumash. In: ArnoldJ (eds) The Origins of a Pacific Coast Kingdom: The Chumash of the Channel Islands, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 71–112.
6.
Arnold J and Graesch (2004) The later evolution of the Island Chumash. In: Arnold J (ed.) Foundations of Chumash Complexity. Los Angeles, CA: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, UCLA, pp. 1–16.
7.
ArnoldJMunnsA (1994) Independent or attached specialization: The organization of shell bead production in California. Journal of Field Archaeology21(4): 473–490.
8.
ArthurC (2004) Money and the form of value. In: BellofioreRTaylorN (eds) The Constitution of Capital: Essays on Volume I of Marx’s Capital, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35–62.
9.
BennyhoffJHughesR (1987) Shell bead and ornament exchange networks between California and the Western Great Basin. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History64(2): 79–175.
10.
BonacichE (1972) A theory of ethnic antagonism: The split labor market. American Sociological Review37(5): 547–559.
11.
CampbellM (2004) The objectivity of value versus the idea of habitual action. In: BellofioreRTaylorN (eds) The Constitution of Capital: Essays on Volume I of Marx’s Capital, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 63–87.
12.
ChapmanA (1980) Barter as a universal mode of exchange. L’Homme: Revue Française d’Anthropologie20(3): 33–83.
13.
ClelandR (1941) The Cattle on a Thousand Hills: Southern California, 1850–1880, San Marino, CA: Huntington Library.
14.
Coughlin M (1970) Boston Merchants on the Coast, 1787–1821: An Insight into the American Acquisition of California. PhD Dissertation in History, University of Southern California.
GaileyC (1987) Kinship to Kingship: Gender Hierarchy and State Formation in the Tongan Islands, Austin: University of Texas Press.
17.
GambleL (2008) The Chumash World: Power, Trade, and Feasting among Complex Hunter-gatherers, Berkeley: University of California Press.
18.
GambleLZepedaI (2002) Social differentiation and exchange among the Kumeyaay Indians during the historic period. Historical Archaeology36(3): 71–91.
19.
Graesch A (2004) Specialized bead making among Island Chumash households: Community labor organization during the historic period. In: Arnold J (ed.) Foundations of Chumash Complexity. Perspectives in California Archaeology 7. Los Angeles, CA: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, UCLA, pp. 133–176.
20.
HackelS (1998) Land, labor, and production: The colonial economy of Spanish and Mexican California. In: GutiérrezROrsiR (eds) Contested Eden: California before the Gold Rush, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 111–146.
21.
HackelS (2005) Children of Coyote, Missionaries of Saint Francis: Indian-Spanish Relations in Colonial California, 1769–1850, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
22.
HarveyD (2010) A Companion to Marx’s Capital, London: Verso.
23.
HeizerR (1968) The Indians of Los Angeles County: Hugo Reid’s Letters of 1852. Southwest Museum Papers 21, Los Angeles, CA: Southwest Museum.
24.
HudsonTBlackburnT (1986) The Material Culture of the Chumash Interaction Sphere, vol. 5: Manufacturing Processes, Metrology, and Trade, Menlo Park, CA: Ballena Press.
25.
HutchinsonC (1969) Frontier Settlements in Mexican California, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
ItohMLapavitsasC (1999) Political Economy of Money and Finance, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
27.
JacksonR (1992) The changing economic structure of the Alta California missions – a reinterpretation. Pacific Historical Review61(3): 387–415.
28.
JacksonRCastilloE (1995) Indians, Franciscans, and Spanish Colonization: The Impact of the Mission System on California Indians, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
29.
JohnsonJ (1989) The Chumash and the missions. In: ThomasD (eds) Columbian Consequences, vol. 1: Archaeological and Historical Perspectives on the Spanish Borderlands West, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 365–376.
30.
KingC (1974) The explanation of differences and similarities among beads used in prehistoric and early historic California. In: BeanLKingT (eds) Antap: California Indian Political and Economic Organization, Ramona, CA: Ballena Press, pp. 75–92.
31.
KingC (1976) Chumash inter-village economic exchange. In: BeanLBackburnT (eds) Native Californians: A Theoretical Perspective, Menlo Park, CA: Ballena Press, pp. 289–318.
32.
King C (1981) The Evolution of Chumash Society: A Comparative Study of Artifacts Used in Social System Maintenance in the Santa Barbara Channel Region before A.D. 1800. PhD Dissertation in Anthropology, University of California, Davis.
33.
KopytoffI (1986) The cultural biography of things: Commodization as a process. In: ApparaduraiA (eds) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–91.
34.
Longinos MartínezJ (1938[1791–2]) California in 1792: The Expedition of José Longinos Martínez, San Marino, CA: Henry Huntington Library and Art Gallery.
35.
MarxK (1973[1857–8]) Grundrisse: Foundations to the Critique of Political Economy, New York: Vintage Books.
36.
MarxK (1977[1863–7]) Capital: A Critique of Political EconomyVol. 1, New York: Vintage Books.
37.
MasonW (1998) The Census of 1790: A Demographic History of Colonial California, Menlo Park, CA: Ballena Press.
38.
MohunS (1991) Socially necessary labour. In: BottomoreT (eds) A Dictionary of Marxist Thought, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 503–504.
39.
OgdenA (1941) The California Sea Otter Trade, 1784–1848, Berkeley: University of California Press.
40.
PhillipsG (1980) Indians in Los Angeles, 1781–1875: Economic integration, social disintegration. Pacific Historical Review48(3): 427–451.
41.
PhillipsG (2010) Vineyards and Vaqueros: Indian Labor and the Economic Expansion of Southern California, 1771–1877, Norman, CA: Arthur H. Clark.
42.
PittL (1966) The Decline of the Californios: A Social History of the Spanish-speaking Californians, 1846–1890, Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
Saad-FilhoA (2002) The Value of Marx: Political Economy for Contemporary Capitalism, London: Routledge.
44.
SandosJ (1991) Christianization among the Chumash: An ethnohistoric perspective. American Indian Quarterly15(1): 65–89.
45.
SpencerH (2002[1898]) The Principles of SociologyVol. 3, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
46.
TurnerJ (1985) Herbert Spencer: A Renewed Appreciation, London: Sage.
47.
WeberD (1992) The Spanish Frontier in North America, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
