I consider the mnemonic agency of the art adorning a diverse range of artefacts interred in one of Europe’s most famous archaeological discoveries. The early seventh-century AD burial chamber constructed within a ship beneath Mound 1 at Sutton Hoo, Suffolk, UK, was uncovered in 1939. I identify a theme linking the prestige artefacts placed within this ‘princely’ grave: many are covered with eyes or eye-like forms. I argue that this ocular quality to the art — not simply visually striking but affording the sense of animated, watching presences — was integral to the selection of artefacts for burial. I argue that the beastly, monstrous and humanoid eyes commemorated the dead person as all-seeing. Those witnessing the staged wrapping and consignment of the artefacts were afforded the sense of being all-seen. By exploring art in this elite mortuary context, the article presents a case study in the early medieval archaeology of the senses.
Back Danielsson I-M ( 2007) Masking Moments: The Transitions of Bodies and Beings in Late Iron Age Scandinavia. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
2.
Bruce-Mitford R. ( 1975) The Sutton Hoo Ship-Burial, Volume 1: Excavations, Background, the Ship, Dating and Inventory. London: British Museum .
3.
Bruce-Mitford R. ( 1978) The Sutton Hoo Ship-Burial, Volume 2: Arms, Armour and Regalia. London: British Museum.
4.
Bruce-Mitford R. ( 2005) A Corpus of Late Celtic Hanging-Bowls. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
Bruce-Mitford R. and Evans AC ( 1983) The Sutton Hoo Ship-Burial, Volume 3. London: British Museum.
6.
Brundle, L. (2009) ‘Becoming Anglo-Saxon ArtAgency, Performance and Mnemonics’. Conference paper presented at the session ‘Medieval Sensory Perceptions: Beyond the Classical Senses’, 31st Annual Conference of the Theoretical Archaeology Group, University of Durham, 19 December 2009.
7.
Carver M. ( 2000) Burial as Poetry: The Case of Sutton Hoo. In: Tyler E (ed.) Treasure in the Early Medieval West. Woodbridge : Boydell, 25-48.
8.
Carver M. ( 2005) Sutton Hoo: A Seventh-Century Princely Burial Ground and its Context. London: British Museum andSociety of Antiquaries of London.
9.
Carver M.(2010) Agency, Intellect and the Archaeological Agenda. In: Carver M, Sanmark A and Semple S (eds) Signals of Belief: Anglo-Saxon Paganism Revisited. Oxford: Oxbow, 1-20.
10.
Cummings V. ( 2002) Experiencing Texture and Transformation in theBritish Neolithic. Oxford Journal of Archaeology21(3): 249-261.
11.
Devlin Z. ( 2007) Remembering the Dead in Anglo-Saxon England: Memory Theory in Archaeology and History (British Archaeological Reports British Series 446). Oxford: Archaeopress .
12.
Dickinson T. ( 2002) Translating Animal Art: Salin’s Style I and Anglo-Saxon Cast Saucer Brooches. Hikuin29: 163-186.
13.
Dickinson T. ( 2005) Symbols of Protection: The Significance of Animal-ornamented Shields in Early Anglo-Saxon England. Medieval Archaeology49: 109-163.
14.
Effros B. ( 2002a) Caring for Body and Soul. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
15.
Effros B. ( 2002b) Creating Community with Food and Drink in Merovingian Gaul. London: Palgrave.
16.
Fern C. ( 2007) Early Anglo-Saxon Horse Burial of the Fifth to Seventh Centuries AD. In: Semple S and Williams H (eds) Early Medieval Mortuary Practices: Anglo-Saxon Studies in Archaeology and History 14. OxfordOxford University School of Archaeology, 92-109.
17.
Fern C.(2010) Horses in Mind. In: Carver M, Sanmark A and Semple S (eds) Signals of Belief: Anglo-Saxon Paganism Revisited. Oxford : Oxbow, 132-161.
18.
Filmer-Sankey W. ( 1996) The ‘‘Roman Emperor’’ in the Sutton Hoo Ship Burial. Journal of the British Archaeological Association149: 1-9.
19.
Gell A. ( 1992) The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology . In: Coote J andShelton A (eds) Anthropology: Art and Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 40-67.
20.
Gell A. ( 1998) Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Giles K. ( 2007) Seeing and Believing: Visuality and Space in Pre-modern England. World Archaeology39(1): 105-121.
22.
Giles M. ( 2008) Seeing Red: The Aesthetics of Martial Objects in the British and Irish Iron Age. In: Garrow D, Gosden C and Hill JD (eds) Rethinking Celtic Art. Oxford : Oxbow, 59-77.
23.
Graves CP ( 2008) Sensing and Believing: Exploring Worlds of Difference in Pre-modern England: A Contribution to the Debate Opened by Kate Giles. World Archaeology39(4): 515-531.
24.
Halsall G. ( 2003) Burial Writes: Graves, Texts and Time in Early Merovingian Northern Gaul. In: Jarnut J and Wemhoff M (eds) Erinnerungskultur im Bestattungsritual . Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 61-74.
25.
Hamilakis Y. ( 1998) Eating the Dead: Mortuary Feasting and the Politics of Memory in the Aegean Bronze Age Societies. In: Branigan K (ed.) Cemetery and Society in the Aegean Bronze Age. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 115-132.
26.
Hedeager L. ( 1999) Myth and Art: A Passport to Political Authority in Scandinavia during the Migration Period. In: Dickinson T and Griffiths D (eds) The Making of Kingdoms: Anglo-Saxon Studies in Archaeology and History , Vol. 10. Oxford: Oxbow, 151-156.
27.
Helmbrecht M. ( 2007) Der Gebrauch von Anthropomorphen Darstellungen im Vendel- und Wikingerzeitlichen Skandinavien - Das Beispiel der Motivgruppe ‘‘Hörnerhelmträger’’. In: Grünewald C and Capelle T (eds) Innere Strukturen von Siedlungen und Gräberfeldern als Spiegel gesellschaftlicher Wirklichkeit? (Akten des 57. Internationalen Sachsensymposions, 26-30 August, Münster ): Münster, 163-171.
28.
Henderson G. ( 1999) Vision and Image in Early Christian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
29.
Hinton D. ( 2005) Gold and Gilt, Pots and Pins: Possessions and People in Medieval Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
Høilund Nielsen K. ( 1998) Animal Style - A Symbol of Might and Myth: Salin’s Style II in aEuropean Context. Acta Archaeologia69: 1-52.
31.
Høilund Nielsen K. ( 1999) Style II and the Anglo-Saxon Elite. In: Dickinson T and Griffiths D (eds) The Making of Kingdoms: Anglo-Saxon Studies in Archaeology and History, Vol. 10. Oxford : Oxbow, 185-202.
32.
Jennbert K. ( 2006) The Heroized Dead: People, Animals and Materiality in Scandinavian Death Rituals, AD 200-1000. In: Andrén A, Jennbert K and Raudvere C (eds) Old Norse Religion in Long-Term Perspectives: Origins, Changes and Interactions. Stockholm : Almqvist and Wiksell, 135-140.
33.
Jones A. ( 2007) Memory and Material Culture. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
34.
Kitzinger E. ( 1993) Interlace and Icon: Form and Function in Early Insular Art. In: Spearman RM and Higgitt J (eds) The Age of Migrating Ideas: Early Medieval Art in Northern Britain and Ireland. Edinburgh : National Museums of Scotland, 3-15.
35.
Kristoffersen S. ( 1995) Transformation in Migration Period Animal Art. Norwegian Archaeological Review28(1): 1-18.
36.
Lee C. ( 2007) Feasting the Dead: Food and Drink in Anglo-Saxon Burial Rituals. Woodbridge: Boydell .
37.
Leigh D. ( 1984) Ambiguity in Anglo-Saxon Style I Art. Antiquaries Journal64: 34-42.
38.
Marzinzik S. ( 2007) The Sutton Hoo Helmet. London : British Museum.
39.
Norr S. ( 2008) Old Gold - the Helmet in Hákonarmál as a Sign of its Time. In: Norr S (ed.) Valsgärde Studies: The Place and its People, Past and Present. Uppsala: Uppsala University, 83-114.
40.
Pluskowski A. ( 2010) Animal Magic. In: Carver M, Sanmark A and Semple S (eds) Signals of Belief: Anglo-Saxon Paganism Revisited . Oxford: Oxbow , 107-131.
41.
Price N. ( 2008) Bodylore and the Archaeology of Embedded Religion: Dramatic License in the Funerals of the Vikings. In: Whitley DM and Hays-Gilpin K (eds) Faith in the Past: Theorizing Ancient Religion. Walnut Creek: Altamira, 143-165.
42.
Speake G. ( 1980) Anglo-Saxon Art and its Germanic Background. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wamers E. (2009) Behind Animals, Plantsand Interlace: Salin’s Style II on Christian Objects. In: Graham-Campbell J and Ryan M (eds) Anglo-Saxon/Irish Relations Before the Vikings (Proceedings of the British Academy 157). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 151-204.
45.
Webster L. ( 1992) Death’s Diplomacy: Sutton Hoo in the Light of Other Male Princely Burials. In: Farrell R and Neuman de Vegvar C (eds) Sutton Hoo: Fifty Years After. Oxford: Oxbow , 75-82.
46.
Wickham-Crowley K. ( 1992) The Birds on the Sutton Hoo Instrument. In: Farrell R and Neuman de Vegvar C (eds) Sutton Hoo: Fifty Years After. Oxford: Oxbow, 43-62.
47.
Williams H. ( 2001) Death, Memory and Time: A Consideration of Mortuary Practices at Sutton Hoo. In: Humphrey C and Ormrod WM (eds) Time in the Middle Ages . Woodbridge: Boydell, 35-71.
48.
Williams H. ( 2004) Death Warmed Up: The Agency of Bodies and Bones in Early Anglo-Saxon Cremation Rites. Journal of Material Culture9(3): 263-291.
49.
Williams H. ( 2005) Review Article: Rethinking Early Medieval Mortuary Archaeology . Early Medieval Europe13(2): 195-217.
50.
Williams H. ( 2006) Death and Memory in Early Medieval Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
51.
Williams H. ( 2009) On Display: n Display: Envisioning the Early Anglo-Saxon DeadIn: Sayer D and Williams H (eds) Mortuary Practices & Social Identities in the Middle Ages: Essays in Burial Archaeology in Honour of Heinrich Härke. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 170-206.
52.
Williams H.(2010) At the Funeral. In: Carver M, Sanmark A and Semple S (eds) Signals of Belief in Early England: Anglo-Saxon Paganism Revisited. Oxford: Oxbow , 68-84.
53.
Williams H. and Sayer D.(2009) Halls of Mirrors: Death & Identity in Medieval Archaeology. In: Sayer D and Williams H (eds) Mortuary Practices & Social Identities in the Middle Ages: Essays in Burial Archaeology in Honour of Heinrich Härke . Exeter: University of Exeter Press , 1-22.
54.
Williamson T. ( 2008) Sutton Hoo and its Landscape: The Context of Monuments . Oxford: Oxbow.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
