It is argued here that the desire to make things visible that under-writes archaeological research is an effect of the Western split between subject and object. This conforms a matrix of `optic knowledge', or the totalizing gaze of an all-knowing subject, that infuses our language and practices with visual metaphors. The critical consideration of visual metaphors is particularly relevant for gender studies in archaeology and their desire to make women visible. However, this desire also enables the re-signification of vision as a connected experience within a field of social and material forces, thus exposing gender, or any other aspect of social difference, as part of a field of relational practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Appadurai, A. and C. Breckenridge (1995) `Public Modernity in India', in C. Breckenridge (ed.) Consuming Modernity. Public Culture in a South Asian World, pp. 1-20. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
2.
Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press .
3.
Bakhtin, M. (1994) `The formal method in literary scholarship', in Morris, P. (ed.) The Bakhtin Reader: Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev and Voloshinov, pp. 175-180. London: Arnold .
4.
Bapty, I. and T. Yates, eds (1990) Archaeology after Structuralism. Post-Structuralism and the Practice of Archaeology. London: Routledge .
5.
Barrett, J. (1994) Fragments from Antiquity. An Archaeology of Social Life in Britain, 2900-1200 B.C. Oxford: Blackwell .
6.
Barthes, R. (1981) Camera Lucida. Reflections on Photography. New York: Vintage International .
7.
Bellelli, C., M. Berón and V. Scheinsohn (1993) `Una arqueología de distinto género' , Publicar3: 47-59 .
8.
Bender, B. (1993) `Introduction', in B. Bender (ed.) Landscapes: Politics and Perspectives, pp. 1-7. Oxford: Berg .
9.
Bender, B. (1999) `Subverting the Western gaze: mapping alternative worlds', in P. Ucko and R. Layton (eds) The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape, pp. 30-45. London: Routledge .
10.
Berger, J. (1980) About Looking. New York: Pantheon .
11.
Biddick, K. (1993) `Genders, Bodies, Borders: Technologies of the Visible' , Speculum68(2): 389-412 .
12.
Binford, L. (1983) In Pursuit of the Past: Decoding the Archaeological Record. New York: Thames and Hudson .
13.
Bordo, S. (1990) `Feminism, postmodernism, and gender-skepticism', in L. Nicholson (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism, pp. 133-156. London: Routledge .
14.
Bourdieu, P. (1997) Pascalian Meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press .
15.
Bourdieu, P. and L. Wacquant (1999) `On the Cunning of Imperialist Reason' , Theory, Culture and Society16(1): 41-58 .
16.
Bradley, R. (2000) An Archaeology of Natural Places. London: Routledge .
17.
Brumfiel, E. (1992) `Breaking and Entering the Ecosystem: Gender, Class and Faction Steal the Show' , American Anthropologist94(3): 551-567 .
18.
Bryson, N. (1983) Vision and Painting: The Logic of the Gaze. New Haven: Yale University Press .
19.
Burgin, P. (1996) In/different Spaces. Berkeley: University of California Press .
20.
Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble. Feminism and The Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge .
21.
Butler, J. (1992) `Contingent foundations: feminism and the question of “post-modernism” ', in J. Butler and J. Scott (eds) Feminists Theorize the Political, pp. 3-21. New York: Routledge .
22.
Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of `Sex'. New York: Routledge .
23.
Bynum, C. (1995) `Why All the Fuss about the Body? A Medievalist's Perspective' , Critical Inquiry22: 1-33 .
24.
Claassen, C. and R. Joyce, eds (1997) Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press .
25.
Classen, C., D. Howes and A. Synnott (1994) Aroma. The Cultural History of Smell. London and New York: Routledge .
26.
Conkey, M.W. and J.M. Gero (1997) `Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology' , Annual Review of Anthropology26: 411-437 .
27.
Conkey, M.W. and J. Spector (1984) `Archaeology and the Study of Gender' , Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory7: 1-31 .
28.
Conkey, M.W. and S.H. Williams (1991) `Original narratives. The political economy of gender in archaeology', in M. di Leonardo (ed.) Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era, pp. 102-139. Berkeley: University of California Press .
29.
Costin, C.L. (1993) `Textiles, Women, and Political Economy in Late Prehispanic Peru' , Research in Economic Anthropology14: 3-28 .
30.
de Certeau, M. (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press .
31.
de Lauretis, T. (1984) Alice Doesn't. Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema. Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
32.
del Valle, T. (1993) `Introduction', in T. del Valle (ed.) Gendered Anthropology, pp. 1-6. London and New York: Routledge .
33.
Di Stefano, C. (1996) `Autonomy in the light of difference', in N. Hirschmann, and C. Di Stefano (eds) Revisioning the Political. Feminist Reconstructions of Traditional Concepts in Western Political Theory, pp. 95-117. Boulder: Westview Press .
34.
Edmonds, M. (2000) Ancestral Geographies of the Neolithic. London: Routledge .
35.
Fabian, J. (1983) Time and the Other. How Anthropology Makes its Object. New York: Columbia University Press .
36.
Fausto Sterling, A. (2000) Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books .
37.
Foucault, M. (1972) Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings. New York: Pantheon .
38.
Franco, J. (1999) Critical Passions. Selected Essays. Durham: Duke University Press .
39.
Friedman, J. (2000) `Americans Again, or the New Age of Imperial Reason? Global Elite Formation, its Identity and Ideological Discourses' , Theory, Culture and Society17(1): 139-146 .
40.
García Uriburu, N. (1999) Colección Nicolás G. Buenos Aires: Uriburu, Arte Precolombino .
41.
Gell, A. (1998) Art and Agency. An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
42.
Gero, J.M. (1991) `Genderlithics: Women's Roles in Stone Tool Production', in M. Conkey and J. Gero (eds) Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, pp. 163-193. Oxford: Blackwell .
43.
Gero, J.M. (1993) `The social world of prehistoric facts: gender and power in Paleoindian research', in H. du Cros and L. Smith (eds) Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique. Occasional Papers in Prehistory 23, pp. 31-40. Canberra: Department of Prehistory, Australian National University .
44.
Gero, J.M. (1994) `Gender division of labor in the construction of archaeological knowledge in the USA', in G. Bond and A. Gilliam (eds) The Social Construction of the Past: Representation as Power, pp. 144-153. New York: Routledge .
45.
Gero, J.M. (1996) `Archaeological practice and gendered encounters with field data', in R. Wright (ed.) Gender in Archaeology, pp. 251-279. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press .
46.
Gero, J.M. and M.W. Conkey, eds (1991) Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell .
47.
Gero, J.M. and M.C. Scattolin (1995) `Household Production as Glue: Insights from the Early Formative Period in Northwestern Argentina' . Paper presented at Re-examining Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Production and Specialization: Where do we go from here? Society for American Archaeology's 60th Annual Meeting, Minneapolis, MN.
48.
Gilchrist, R. (1994) Gender and Material Culture. The Archaeology of Religious Women. London: Routledge .
49.
Gilchrist, R. (1997) `Ambivalent bodies: gender and medieval archaeology', in J. Moore and E. Scott (eds) Invisible People and Process. Writing Gender and Childhood into European Archaeology, pp. 42-58. London: Leicester University Press .
50.
Gillespie, S. and R. Joyce (1997) `Gendered goods: The symbolism of Maya hierarchical exchange relations', in C. Claassen and R. Joyce (eds) Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica, pp. 189-207. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press .
51.
Gosden, C. (1994) Social Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell .
52.
Gow, P. (1995) `Land, people and paper', in E. Hirsch and M. O'Hanlon (eds) The Anthropology of Landscape. Perspectives on Place and Landscape, pp. 43-62. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
53.
Grimshaw, A. (2001) The Ethnographer's Eye. Ways of Seeing in Modern Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
54.
Grosz, E. (1994) Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. St. Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin .
55.
Hamilakis, I. (1996) `Through the Looking Glass: Nationalism, archaeology and the politics of identity' , Antiquity70: 975-978 .
56.
Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Re-invention of Nature. London: Free Association .
57.
Harstock, N. (1990) `Foucault on power: A theory for women?', in L. Nicholson (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism, pp. 156-175. London: Routledge .
58.
Harvey, D. (1996) Justice, Nature, and the Geography of Difference. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell .
59.
Hastorf, C. (1991) `Gender, space and food in prehistory', in M. Conkey and J. Gero (eds) Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, pp. 132-159. Oxford: Blackwell Science .
60.
Hekman, S. (1990) Gender and Knowledge. Elements of a Postmodern Feminism. Cambridge: Polity Press .
61.
Hendon, J.A. (1997) `Women's work, women's space, and women's status among the classic-period Maya elite of the Copan Valley, Honduras', in C. Claassen and R.A. Joyce (eds) Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica, pp. 33-45. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press .
62.
Heywood, I. and B. Sandywell (1999) `Introduction: explorations in the hermeneutics of vision', in I. Heywood and B. Sandywell (eds) Interpreting Visual Culture. Explorations in the Hermeneutics of the Visual, pp. ix-xviii. London and New York: Routledge .
63.
Hirschmann, N. and C. Di Stefano (1996) `Introduction: revision, reconstruction and the challenge of the new', in N. Hirschmann and C. Di Stefano (eds) Revisioning the Political. Feminist Reconstructions of Traditional Concepts in Western Political Theory, pp. 1-26. Boulder: Westview Press .
64.
Hodder, I. (1982) Symbols in Action. Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
65.
Hodder, I. (1989) `This is not an Article about Material Culture as Text' , Journal of Anthropological Archaeology8, 250-269 .
66.
Hodder, I. (1992) Theory and Practice in Archaeology. London: Routledge .
67.
Hodder, I. (1997) `Commentary: The gender screen', in J. Moore and E. Scott (eds) Invisible People and Process. Writing Gender and Childhood into European Archaeology, pp. 75-78. London: Leicester University Press .
68.
Hodder, I. (1999) The Archaeological Process. An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Science .
69.
Hodder, I. (2000) `Developing a reflexive method in archaeology', in I. Hodder (ed.) Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology. The Example at Çatalhöyük, pp. 3-14. Cambridge: McDonald Institute .
70.
Hollimon, S.E. (1996) `Gender and health among the Chumash: An archaeological examination of prehistoric gender roles' , Proceedings of the Society for California Archaeology9: 205-208 .
71.
Hurcombe, L. (1995) `Our own engendered species' , Antiquity69: 87-100 .
72.
Ingold, T. (2000) The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge .
73.
Irigaray, L. (1985) The Sex Which Is Not One. Ithaca: Cornell University Press .
74.
Jay, M. (1993) `Sartre, Merleau-Ponty and the search for a new ontology of sight', in D. Levin (ed.) Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision, pp. 143-185. Berkeley: University of California Press .
75.
Jay, M. (1994) Downcast Eyes. The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press .
76.
Jensen, O. (2000) `Between body and artefacts. Merleau-Ponty and archaeology', in C. Holtor and H. Karlsson (eds) Philosophy and Archaeological Practice: Perspectives for the 21st Century, pp. 53-67. Göteborg: Bricoleur Press .
77.
Johnson, M. (1999) `Rethinking historical archaeology', in P.P.A. Funari, M. Hall and S. Jones (eds) Historical Archaeology. Back from the Edge, pp. 24-36. London: Routledge .
78.
Joyce, R. (1996a) `The construction of gender in Classic Maya Monuments', in R. Wright (ed.) Gender and Archaeology, pp. 167-195. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press .
79.
Joyce, R. (1996b) `Performance and Inscription: Negotiating Sex and Gender in Classic Maya Society' , Recovering Gender in Prehispanic Mesoamerica, Dumbarton Oaks Conference, Washington DC.
80.
Joyce, R. (2000a) `Girling the Girl and Boying the Boy: The production of adulthood in Ancient Mesoamerica' , World Archaeology31(3): 473-483 .
81.
Joyce, R. (2000b) Gender and Power in Prehispanic Mesoamerica. Tucson: University of Arizona Press .
82.
Joyce, R. and C. Claassen (1997) `Women in the Ancient Americas: Archaeologists, gender, and the making of prehistory', in C. Claassen and R. Joyce (eds) Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica, pp. 1-4. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press .
83.
Knapp, A.B. (1998) `Who's Come a Long Way, Baby? Masculinist approaches to a gendered archaeology' , Archaeological Dialogues5(2): 91-125 .
84.
Knapp, A.B. and L. Meskell (1997) `Bodies of Evidence in Prehistoric Cyprus' , Cambridge Archeological Journal7(2): 183-204 .
85.
Küchler, S. (1993) `Landscape as Memory: The Mapping of Process and its Representation in a Melansian Society', in D. Bender (ed.) Landscapes. Politics and Perspective, pp. 85-106. Oxford: Berg .
86.
Lazzari, M. (1999) `Objetos Viajeros e Imágenes Espaciales: Las Relaciones de Intercambio y la Protección del Espacio Social', in P.P.A. Funari, E.G. Neves and I. Podgorny (eds) Anais da I Reunìao de Teoría Arqueologica na America do Sul, Revista del Museo de Arqueologia y Etnologia, pp. 371-385. Brasil: Universidad de San Pablo .
87.
Lefebvre, H. (1964) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell .
88.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963) Totemism. Boston: Beacon Press .
89.
Lucas, G. (1995) `Interpretation in contemporary archaeology. Some philosophical issues', in M. Shanks, A. Alexandri, V. Buchli, J. Carmen, J. Last and G. Lucas (eds) Interpreting Archaeology. Finding Meaning in the Past, pp. 37-44. London: Routledge .
90.
Lucy, S.J. (1997) `Housewives, warriors and slaves? Sex and gender in Anglo-Saxon burial', in J. Moore and E. Scott (eds) Invisible People and Process. Writing Gender and Childhood into European Archaeology, pp. 150-178. London: Leicester University Press .
91.
Marcus, M. (1993) `Incorporating the Body: Adornment, gender and social identity in Ancient Iran' , Cambridge Archaeological Journal3(2): 157-178 .
92.
McCafferty, G.C. and S.D. McCafferty (1999) `The Metamorphosis of Xochiquetzal. A window in womanhood in pre- and post-conquest Mexico', in T. Sweeley (ed.) Manifesting Power: Gender and the Interpretation of Power in Archaeology, pp. 103-125. London: Routledge .
93.
McGuire, R. and R. Navarrete (1999) `Entre motocicletas y Fusiles: Las Arqueologías Radicas Anglosajona e Hispana', in F. Funari, E.G. Neves and I. Podgorny (eds) Anais da I Reuniao de Teoría Arqueologica na America do Sul, Revista do Museo de Arqueologia e Etnologia, pp. 181-199. Brasil: Universidade de Sao Paulo .
94.
McNay, L. (1992) Foucault and Feminism: Power, Gender and the Self. Cambridge: Polity Press .
95.
Medina, M.C. (1999) ¿El fin de la exclusión?: Razones para incorporar nuevas miradas social a la interpretación arqueológica del mundo andino. Córdoba, Argentina: Resúmenes del XIII Congreso Nacional de Arqueología .
96.
Merleau-Ponty, M (1962) Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .
97.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968) The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press .
98.
Meskell, L. (1996) `The Somatisation of Archaeology: Institutions, Discourses, Corporeality' , Norwegian Archaeological Review29(1): 1-6 .
99.
Meskell, L. (1998) `Running the Gamut: Gender, girls and goddesses' , American Journal of Archaeology102: 181-185 .
100.
Meskell, L. (1999) Archaeologies of Social Life. Age, Sex, Class, etc. in Ancient Egypt. Oxford: Blackwell .
101.
Meskell, L. (2001) `Archaeologies of identity', in I. Hodder (ed.) Archaeological Theory Today, pp. 187-213. Cambridge: Polity Press .
102.
Meskell, L. (2002) `The Intersections of Politics and Identity' , Annual Review of Anthropology31, 279-301 .
103.
Miller, D. (1985) Artefacts as Categories: A Study of Ceramic Variability in Central India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
104.
Mirzoeff, N. (1999) An Introduction to Visual Culture. London and New York: Routledge .
105.
Mohanty, C.T., A. Russo and L. Torres (1991) Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
106.
Molyneaux, B. (1997) `Introduction: The cultural life of images', in B. Molyneaux (ed.) The Cultural Life of Images: Visual Representations in Archaeology, pp. 1-9. New York: Routledge .
107.
Moore, J. and E. Scott, eds (1997) Invisible People and Process. Writing Gender and Childhood into European Archaeology. London: Leicester University Press .
108.
Moser, S. (1998) Ancestral Images. The Iconography of Human Origins. Stroud: Sutton Publishing .
109.
Mulvey, L. (1989) Visual and Other Pleasures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
110.
Munn, N. (1986) The Fame of Gawa. A Symbolic Study of Value Transformation in a Massim (Papua New Guinea) Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
111.
Munn, N. (1990) `Constructing Regional Worlds in Experience: Kula exchange, witchcraft and Gawan local events' , Man25: 1-7 .
112.
Munn, N. (1996) `Excluded Spaces' , Critical Inquiry22: 446-465 .
113.
Nelson, S.M. (1997) Gender in Archaeology: Analyzing Power and Prestige. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press .
114.
Nordbladh, J. and T. Yates (1990) `This perfect body, this virgin text: between sex and gender in archaeology', in I. Bapty and T. Yates (eds) Archaeology after Structuralism. Post-Structuralism and the Practice of Archaeology, pp. 222-239. London: Routledge .
115.
Olick, J. and J. Robbins (1998) `Social Memory Studies: from collective memory to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices' , Annual Review of Sociology24: 105-140 .
116.
Ortner, S. (1996) Making Gender. The Politics and Erotics of Culture. Boston: Beacon Press .
117.
Pollock, G. (1988) Vision and Difference: Femininity, Feminism and Histories of Art. London and New York: Routledge .
118.
Pollock, G. (1999) Differencing the Canon. Feminist Desire and the Writing of Art's Histories. London and New York: Routledge .
119.
Poole, D. (1997) Vision, Race and Modernity. A Visual Economy of the Andean Image World. Princeton: Princeton University Press .
120.
Richlin, A. (1998) `Foucault's history of sexuality: A useful theory for women?', in D. Larmour, P. Miller and C. Platter (eds) Rethinking Sexuality. Foucault and Classical Antiquity, pp. 138-169. Princeton: Princeton University Press .
121.
Ricoeur, P. (1979) `The model of the text: meaningful action considered as a text', in P. Rabinow and W. Sullivan (eds) Interpretive Social Science: A reader. Berkeley: University of California Press .
122.
Sandywell, B. (1999) `Specular grammar: the visual rhetoric of modernity', in I. Heywood and B. Sandywell (eds) Interpreting Visual Culture. Explorations in the Hermeneutics of the Visual, pp. 30-56. London and New York: Routledge .
123.
Sawicki, J. (1991) Disciplining Foucault. Feminism, Power, and the Body. London and New York: Routledge .
124.
Scattolin, M.C..(2000) Santa María durante el Primer Milenio A. D. ¿Tierra baldía? Göteborg, Sweden: Årstryck .
125.
Scattolin, M.C. (forthcoming-a) Los Ancestros de Calchaquí: Una Visión de la Colección Zavaleta. Jujuy, Argentina: Cuadernos FHYCS-UNJu .
126.
Scattolin, M.C. (forthcoming-b) `La Mujer que Carga el Cántaro', in B. Alberti and V. Williams (eds) Identidad y Género, Volumen Especial de la Segunda Reunión Internacional de Teoría Arqueológica en América del Sur. Olavarría, Argentina: Segunda Reunión Internacional de Teoría Arqueológica en América del Sur .
127.
Scattolin, M.C. and M. Lazzari (1997) `Tramando Redes: Obsidianas al Oeste del Aconquija' , Estudios Atacameños14: 189-209 .
128.
Schmidt, R.A. and B.L. Voss, eds (2000) Archaeologies of Sexuality. London and New York: Routledge .
129.
Schutz, A. and T. Luckman (1973) The Structures of the Life-world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press .
130.
Scott, E.M. (1994) `Through the lens of gender: archaeology, inequality and those of little note', in E. Scott (ed.) Those of Little Note. Gender, Race and Class in Historical Archaeology, pp. 3-26. Tucson: University of Arizona Press .
131.
Scott, E. (1997) `Introduction: On the incompleteness of archaeological narratives', in J. Moore and E. Scott (eds) Invisible People and Process. Writing Gender and Childhood into European Archaeology, pp. 1-2. London: Leicester University Press .
132.
Shaffer, B.S., K.M. Gardner and J.F. Powell (1999) `Prehistoric and ethnographic pueblo gender roles. Continuity of lifeways from the eleventh to the early twentieth century', in A. Rautman (ed.) Reading the Body. Representations and Remains in the Archaeological Record, pp. 139-149. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press .
133.
Shanks, M. (1997) `Photography and Archaeology', in B. Molyneaux (ed.) The Cultural Life of Images: Visual Representations in Archaeology, pp. 73-107. New York: Routledge .
134.
Shanks, M. and I. Hodder (1995) `Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies', in I. Hodder, M. Shanks, A. Alexandri, et al. (eds) Interpreting Archaeology. Finding Meaning in the Past, pp. 3-29. London: Routledge .
135.
Shanks, M. and C. Tilley (1987) Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity Press .
136.
Soja, E. (1989) Postmodern Geographies. The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London and New York: Verso .
137.
Soja, E. (1996) Thirdspace. Journey to Los Angeles and Other-Real-and-Imagined Places. Cambridge: Blackwell Science .
138.
Strathern, M. (1988) The Gender of the Gift. Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press .
139.
Strathern, M. (1996) `Cutting the Network' , Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute2(3): 517-535 .
140.
Sweeley, T., ed. (1999) Manifesting Power: Gender and the Interpretation of Power in Archaeology. London: Routledge .
141.
Taussig, M. (1993) Mimesis and Alterity. A Particular History of the Senses. New York: Routledge .
142.
Thomas, J. (1993) `The Politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape', in B. Bender (ed.) Landscapes: Politics and Perspectives, pp. 19-48. Oxford: Berg .
143.
Thomas, J. (1996) Time, Culture and Identity. An Interpretive Archaeology. London: Routledge .
144.
Thomas, J. (1998) `Reconfiguring the Social, Reconfiguring the Material.' Paper presented at the I Reuniao Teoría Arqueologica na America do Sul, Vitoria, Brasil.
145.
Thomas, J. (2001) `Archaeologies of place and landscape', in I. Hodder (ed.) Archaeological Theory Today, pp. 165-186. Cambridge: Polity Press .
146.
Thrift, N. (1996) Spatial Formations. London: Sage Publications .
147.
Virilio, P. (1994) The Vision Machine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press .
148.
Williams, R. (1973) Marxism and Literature. London: Verso .
149.
Wylie, A. (1991) `Gender and the archaeological record: why is there no archaeology of gender?', in J.M. Gero and M.W. Conkey (eds) Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, pp. 31-54. Oxford: Blackwell .
150.
Wylie, A. (1992) `The interplay of evidental constraints and political interests: Recent arachaeological research on gender' , American Antiquity57(1): 15-32 .
151.
Yates, T. (1990) `Archaeology through the looking-glass', in I. Bapty and T. Yates (eds) Archaeology after Structuralism: Post-structuralism and the Practice of Archaeology, pp. 153-204. London: Routledge .
152.
Yates, T. (1993) `Frameworks for an archaeology of the body', in C. Tilley (ed.) Interpretative Archaeology, pp. 31-72. Oxford: Berg .
153.
Zizek, S. (1996) ` “I hear you through my eyes”: or, the invisible master', in R. Salecl and S. Zizek (eds) Gaze and Voice as Love Objects, pp. 90-126. Durham: Duke University Press .
