This article deals with some of the critical issues and problems facing archaeological theory and practice in a postpositivist world. It tries to explore a third way between objectivist and subjectivist methodological alternatives. In particular reviewing the concept and practice of interpretation as being the only way of obtaining understanding from the archeaological record. Avoiding neo-empirical reactions as much as individualistic or hypersubjectivist standpoints, this article highlights the possibility (and problems) of interpretation as a positive practice, exploring a methodology that could allow archaeology to construct an intersubjective understanding of material meaning.
Andersson, A.C., A. Gillberg, O.W. Jensen, H. Karlsson and M.V. Rolöf, eds (1998) The Kaleidoscopic Past. Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Theoretical Archaeology Group Conference. Göteborg: Department of Archaeology, Göteborg University.
3.
Barton, C. and G. Clark (1997) Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary Theory and Archaeological Explanation. Archaeological Papers of American Anthropological Association 9. Arlington, VA: AAA.
4.
Bate, L.F. (1998) El Proceso de Investigación en Arqueología. Barcelona: Crítica.
5.
Bermejo Barrera, J.C. (1989) Replanteamiento de la Historia. Ensayos de Historia Teórica II. Madrid: Akal.
6.
Bermejo Barrera, J.C. (1994) Entre Historia y Filosofía. Madrid: Akal.
7.
Bermejo Barrera, J.C. (1999) Genealogia de la Historia. Ensayos de Historia Teórica III. Madrid: Akal.
8.
Berthoud, G. (1992) Vers une Anthropologie Générale. Modernité et Altérite. Paris-Genéve: Librairie DROZ.
9.
Bietti, A., A. Cazzella, I. Johnson and A. Voorips (1996) Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Colloquium 1: The Debate on Function and Meaning in Prehistoric Archaeology: Processual versus Post-Processual Archaeology in the 90s. XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences (Forli, Italy, September 1996). Forli: A.B.A.C.O. Edizioni.
10.
Blanton, R.E., G.M. Feinman, Kowalewski and P.N. Peregrine (1996) ‘A Dual-Processual Theory for the Evolution of Mesoamerican Civilization’, Current Anthropology37 (1): 1-14, and (replies) 65-8.
11.
Boniface, P. and P.J. Fowler (1993) Heritage and Tourism in the Global Village. London: Routledge.
12.
Carrithers, M., S. Collins and S. Lukes, eds (1985) The Category of the Person. Anthropology, Philosophy, History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Paris: Minuit (1974).
14.
Clifford, J. and G.E. Marcus (1986) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
Clottes, J. (1992) ‘Phénomènes de mode dan l’Archéologie Française’, in T. Shay and J. Clottes The Limitations of Archaeological Knowledge, pp. 225-45. Liège: Université de Liège, Service de Préhistoire.
16.
Cohen, A.P. (1994) Self Consciousness. An Alternative Anthropology of Identity. London: Routledge.
17.
Coudart, A. (1999) ‘Is Post-processualism Bound to Happen Everywhere? The French Case’, Antiquity73: 161-167.
18.
Criado Boado, F. (1989) ‘We, the Post-megalithic People...’, in I. Hodder (ed.) The Meanings of Things. Material Culture and Symbolic Expression, pp. 79-89. London: Routledge.
19.
Criado Boado, F. (1993) ‘Límites y posibilidades de la Arqueología del paisaje’, SPAL, Revista de Prehistoria y Arqueología, 2: 9-55.
20.
Criado Boado, F. (1995) ‘The Visibility of the Archaeological Record and the Interpretation of Social Reality’, in I. Hodder, M. Shankset al. (eds) Interpreting Archaeology. Finding Meaning in the Past, pp. 194-204. Oxford: Routledge.
21.
Criado Boado, F. (1996) ‘El futuro de la arqueología, ¿la Arqueología del futuro?’, Trabajos de Prehistoria 53 (1): 15-35.
22.
Criado Boado, F. (2000) ‘Walking about Lévi-Strauss. Contributions to an Archaeology of Thought, with a comment by J. Nordbladh and a response by F. Criado Boado’, in C. Holtorf and J. Karlsson (eds) Philosophy and Archaeological Practice. Perspectives for the 21th Century, pp. 277-303. Göteborg: Bricoleur Press.
23.
Cruz Rodríguez, M. (1987) Narratividad. La Nueva Síntesis. Barcelona: Península.
24.
Dennett, D.C. (1987) The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
25.
Djindjian, F. (1996) ‘L’apport des Sciences cognitives à l’Archéologie’, in A. Bietti, A. Cazzella, I. Johnson and A. Voorips (eds) Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Colloquium 1: The Debate on Function and Meaning in Prehistoric Archaeology: Processual versus Post-Processual Archaeology in the 90s. XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences (Forli, Italy, September 1996), pp. 17-28. Forli: A.B.A.C.O. Edizioni.
26.
Domínguez Caparrós, J. (1993) Orígenes del Discurso Crítico. Teorías Antiguas y Medievales Sobre la Interpretación. Madrid: Gredos.
27.
Dougherty, J.W.D., ed. (1985) Directions in Cognitive Anthropology. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
28.
Dumont, L. (1982) Homo Aequalis. Génesis y Apogeo de la Ideología Económica. Madrid: Taurus; Paris: Seuil (1977).
29.
Dumont, L. (1987) Ensayos Sobre el Individualismo. Una Perspectiva Antropológica Sobre la Ideología Moderna. Madrid: Alianza; Paris: Seuil (1983).
30.
Eco, U. (1990) ‘Los Límites de la Interpretación’, Revista de Occidente, 118: 5-24.
31.
Eco, U. (1992). Los Límites de la Interpretación. Barcelona: Lumen; Milán (1990).
32.
Eiroa, J.J. (2000) Nociones de Prehistoria General. Barcelona: Arie.
33.
Ferraris, M. (2000) Historia de la Hermenéutica. Madrid: Akal; Milano: Bompiani (1988).
34.
Giddens, A. (1997) Modernidad e Identidad del yo. El yo y la Sociedad en la época Contemporánea. Barcelona: Península.
35.
González Méndez, M. (1996) ‘Viajes a Vestigios, Incitación del Consumo a la Arqueología’, in Difusión del Patrimonio Histórico, pp. 44-59. Sevilla: Instituto Andaluz del Patrimonio Histórico.
36.
Hernando Gonzalo, A. (1999a) ‘Percepción de la Realidad y Prehistoria. Relación entre la Construcción de la Identidad y la Complejidad Socio-Económica en los Grupos Humanos’, Trabajos de Prehistoria 56 (2): 19-35.
37.
Hernando Gonzalo, A. (1999b) ‘El Espacio no es Necesariamente un Lugar: en Torno al Concepto de Espacio y sus Implicaciones en el Estudio de la Prehistoria’, Arqueología Espacial 21: 7-27.
38.
Hispania Nostra, 1997. Patrimonio y Sociedad. Diez años de aplicación de la Ley del Patrimonio Histórico Español. Madrid: Asociación Hispania Nostra.
39.
Hodder, I. (1991) ‘Interpretative Archaeology and its Role’, American Antiquity56(1): 7-18.
40.
Hodder, I. (1992) ‘Archaeology and the Post-Modern’, in I. Hodder Theory and Practice in Archaeology, pp. 275-280. London: Routledge.
41.
Hodder, I., M. Shanks, A. Alexandri, V. Buchli, J. Carman, J. Last and G. Lucas (1995) Interpreting Archaeology. Finding Meaning in the Past. London: Routledge.
42.
Holtorf, C. and J. Karlsson, eds (2000) Philosophy and Archaeological Practice. Perspectives for the 21st Century. Göteborg: Bricoleur Press.
43.
Johnsen, H. and B. Olsen (1992) ‘Hermeneutics and Archaeology: On the Philosophy of Contextual Archaeology’, American Antiquity57(3): 419-436.
44.
Jones, B. (1984) Past Imperfect. The Story of Rescue Archaeology. London: Heinemann.
45.
Junyent, E. (1999) ‘Patrimonio Arqueològic, Difusió i Mercat: Algunes Reflexions’, Cota Zero 15: 9-27.
46.
Karlsson, J. (1998). Re-thinking Archaeology. Göteborg: Department of Archaeology, Göteborg University.
47.
Karp, I. and S.D. Lavine, eds (1991) Exhibiting Cultures. The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
48.
Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
49.
Lakoff, G. and M. Turner (1989) More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50.
Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
Lyotard, J.F. (1987) La Postmodernidad (Explicada a los Niños). Barcelona: Gedisa; Paris: Galilée (1986).
52.
McCullagh, B. (1984) Justifying Historical Descriptions. Albany, NY: Cornell University Press.
53.
Macinnes, L. and C.R. Wickham-Jones (1992) All Natural Things. Archaeology and the Green Debate. Oxford: Owbow.
54.
Morris, B. (1994) Anthropology of the Self. The Individual in Cultural Perspective. London: Pluto Press.
55.
Padró Werner, J. (1996) ‘La Interpretación: un Método Dinámico para Promover el Uso Social del Patrimonio Natural y Cultural’, in Difusión del Patrimonio Histórico, pp. 8-13. Sevilla: Instituto Andaluz del Patrimonio Histórico.
56.
Prentice, R. (1993) Tourism and Heritage Attractions. London: Routledge.
57.
Quagliuolo, M. (1996) La Gestione del Patrimonio Culturale. Lo Stato dellÁrte. Atti del Iº Colloquio Internazionale, Orvieto: DRI-Ente Interregionale.
58.
Renfrew, C. (1982) Towards an Archaeology of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Renfrew, C. (1994) ‘Towards a Cognitive Archaeology’, in C. Renfrew and E. Zubrow (eds) The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology, pp. 3-12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Rorty, R. (1991) Objectivism, Relativism and Truth. Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Shweder, R.A. and E.J. Bourne (1984) ‘Does the Concept of the Person vary Cross-Culturally?’, in R.A. Shweder (ed.), Culture Theory: Essays on Mind, Self and Evolution, pp. 158-199. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
Sökefeld (1993) ‘Debating Self, Identity and Culture in Anthropology’, Current Archaeology40(4): 417-417.
63.
Strathern, M., ed. (1995) Shifting Contexts: Transformations in Anthropological Knowledge. London: Routledge.
64.
Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the Self. The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
65.
Thomas, J. (1989) ‘Technologies of the Self and the Constitution of the Subject’, Archaeological Review from Cambridge8 (1): 101-107.
66.
Thomas, J. (1999) Time, Culture and Identity. An Interpretative Archaeology. London: Routledge.
67.
Tilden, F. (1977) Interpreting our Heritage, 3rd edn.Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
68.
Tilley, C. (1990) ‘Constituint una Arqueologia Social, un Projecte “Modernista” ’, in J. Anfruns and E. Lobet (eds) El Canvi Cultural a la Prehistoria, pp. 17-44. Barcelona: Columna.
Tilley, C. (1999) Metaphor and Material Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
71.
Vattimo, G. (1991) El Fin de la Modernidad. Nihilismo y Hermenéutica en la Cultura Postmoderna. Barcelona: Gedisa.
72.
Vattimo, G. (1995) Más Allá de la Interpretación. Barcelona: Paidós; Laterza (1994).
73.
Viveiros de Castro, E. (1996) ‘Os Pronomes Cosmológicos e o Perspectivismo Amerindio’, Mana 2 (2): 115-44.
74.
White, H. (1987) The Content of the Form. Narrative Discourse and Historial Representation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
75.
Wylie, A. (1993) ‘A Proliferation of New Archaeologists: “Beyond Objectivism and Relativism” ’, in N. Yoffee and A. Sherratt (eds) Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?, pp. 20-26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76.
Yoffee, N. and A. Sherratt (1993) Archaeological Theory: Who Sets the Agenda?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
