Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments around the world placed communities under ‘lockdown’. Various practices of consumption were uprooted from their instituted settings and re-rooted in homes. This unprecedented reorganisation of normality resulted in increased instances of domestic consumption as practices occurring in offices, gyms and eateries were forced into homes, demanding the acquisition of materials and altering expectations of what homes are for. This article contributes to literature on COVID-19 and practice-based consumption research by complicating optimistic narratives about the potential for this disruption to downsize the consumer economy. Combining qualitative household interviews, with secondary data about wider trends, and historical reflection on changes in the meaning of the ‘home’ in the UK, we reveal how the re-rooting of instituted practices structures material acquisition and spikes desire for more domestic space. Recognising that professional practices and institutions have taken on increasing significance for domestic consumption, with stay-at-home orders blurring boundaries between home, work and leisure, we conclude by arguing that future research and sustainability policy should attend more to the institutional qualities of practices.
AitchisonCMacLeodNEShawSJ, et al. (2000) Leisure and Tourism Landscapes: Social and cultural geographies. London: Routledge.
2.
AkrichM (1992) The description of technical objects. In: BijkerWELawJ (eds) Shaping Technology/building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, pp. 205–224.
3.
BBC (2020b) No End to Covid-19 Webcam Shortage. London: BBC News.
4.
BBC (2020a) Freezer Sales Heat Up Amid Coronavirus Stockpiling. London: BBC News.
5.
BBC (2021a) No Full-Time Return to the Office for Over a Million. London: BBC News.
6.
BBC (2021b) Covid Exercise: “I”ll Never Go Back to the Gym Again. London: BBC News.
7.
Berners-LeeM (2020) How Bad are Bananas?: The Carbon Footprint of Everything. London: Profile Books.
8.
BlueS (2017) Institutional rhythms: combining practice theory and rhythmanalysis to conceptualise processes of institutionalisation. Time & Society28(3): 922–950.
9.
BlueSSpurlingN (2017) Qualities of connective tissue in hospital life: how complexes of practice change. In: HuiASchatzkiTShoveE (eds) The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners. London: Routledge, pp. 24–37.
10.
CarethersJM (2021) Insights into disparities observed with COVID‐19. Journal of Internal Medicine289(4): 463–473.
ChenKWangMHuangC, et al. (2020) Air pollution reduction and mortality benefit during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. The Lancet Planetary Health4(6): e210–e212.
13.
ChengKJGSunYMonnatSM (2020) COVID‐19 death rates are higher in rural counties with larger shares of Blacks and Hispanics. The Journal of Rural Health36(4): 602–608.
CohenMJ (2020) Does the COVID-19 outbreak mark the onset of a sustainable consumption transition?Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy16: 1–3.
16.
EliasM (2014) Lunch: A History. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
Ellsworth-KrebsK (2020) Implications of declining household sizes and expectations of home comfort for domestic energy demand. Nature Energy5(1): 20–25.
18.
GherardiS (2000) Practice-Based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19.
GiddensA (1986) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuralism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
20.
Gram-HanssenK (2011) Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture11(1): 61–78.
GriffinE (2018) Diets, hunger and living standards during the British industrial revolution*. Past & Present239(1): 71–111.
23.
HallMCPrayagGFiegerP, et al. (2020) Beyond panic buying: consumption displacement and COVID-19. Journal of Service Management32: 113–128. DOI: 10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0151.
24.
HandMShoveE (2007) Condensing practices. Journal of Consumer Culture7(1): 79–104.
25.
HitchingsRLathamA (2017) How ‘social’ is recreational running? Findings from a qualitative study in London and implications for public health promotion. Health & Place46: 337–343.
26.
HuiAWalkerG (2018) Concepts and methodologies for a new relational geography of energy demand: social practices, doing-places and settings. Energy Research & Social Science36: 21–29.
IngoldT (2012) Toward an ecology of materials. Annual Review of Anthropology41: 427–442.
29.
JackT (2013) Laundry routine and resource consumption in Australia. International Journal of Consumer Studies37(6): 666–674.
30.
JahshanE (2020) UK grocery enjoys biggest sales jump in 26 years. Retail Gazette27(May): 20.
31.
LathamA (2015) The history of a habit: jogging as a palliative to sedentariness in 1960s America. Cultural geographies22(1): 103–126.
32.
LatourBWoolgarS (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. West Sussex: Sage Publications, Inc.
33.
LittlerCR (1978) Understanding Taylorism. The British Journal of Sociology29: 185–202.
34.
MarkardJRosenbloomD (2020) A tale of two crises: COVID-19 and climate. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy16(1): 53–60.
35.
NCS (2020) Employed Persons Working at Home. National Compensation Survey, Bureau of Labour Statistics. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.t06.htm (accessed 10 December 2020).
36.
NicolaMAlsafiZSohrabiC, et al. (2020) The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. International Journal of Surgery78: 185–193.
37.
NicoliniD (2011) Practice as the site of knowing: insights from the field of telemedicine. Organization Science22: 602–620.
PeteriV (2017) Bad enough ergonomics. SAGE Open7(1): 1–11.
41.
PhuongDReanneF (2021) Unequal burdens: assessing the determinants of elevated COVID-19 case and death rates in New York City’s racial/ethnic minority neighbourhoods. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health75(4): 321–326.
42.
ReckwitzA (2002) Toward a theory of social practices. European Journal of Social Theory5(2): 243–263.
43.
ReckwitzA (2017) Practices and their affects. In: HuiASchatzkiTShoveE (eds) The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners. London: Routledge.
44.
RinkinenJShoveESmitsM (2017) Cold chains in Hanoi and Bangkok: changing systems of provision and practice. Journal of Consumer Culture19(3): 379–397.
45.
RinkinenJJalasM (2016) Moving home: houses, new occupants and the formation of heating practices. Building Research & Information45(3): 293–302.
46.
RoystonSSelbyJShoveE (2018) Invisible energy policies: a new agenda for energy demand reduction. Energy Policy123: 127–135.
47.
RuzickaA (2020) Renters Race to the Suburbs: Bigger Homes in Commuter Towns and Villages are on Trend as 34% of Tenants Demand More Space. This is Money.
48.
SchatzkiTR (1991) Spatial ontology and explanation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers81: 650–670.
49.
SchatzkiT (1996) Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
SchatzkiT (2001a) Introduction: practice theory. In: SchatzkiTCetinaKVon SavignyE (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 1–15.
51.
SchatzkiT (2001b) Practice mind-ed orders. In: SchatzkiTCetinaKVon SavignyE (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 42–55.
52.
SchatzkiT (2002) The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. Pennsylvania: University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press.
53.
SchatzkiTR (2005) Peripheral vision: The sites of organizations. Organization Studies26: 465–484.
54.
SchatzkiTR (2006) On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies27: 1863–1873.
55.
SchatzkiT (2014) Art Bundles. In: ZembylasT (ed) Artistic Practices: Social Interactions and Cultural Dynamics. Taylor & Francis, pp. 17–32.
56.
ShellerMUrryJ (2000) The city and the car. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24(4): 737–757.
57.
ShoveEWalkerG (2014) What is energy for? Social practice and energy demand. Theory, Culture & Society31(5): 41–58.
58.
ShoveEPantzarMWatsonM (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. London: SAGE.
59.
ShoveE (2003) Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organisation of Normality. Oxford: Berg.
60.
ShoveE (2016) Infrastructures and practices: networks beyond the city. In: CoutardORutherfordJ (ed) Beyond the Networked City: Infrastructure Reconfigurations and Urban Change in the North and South. London: Routledge, pp. 242–258.
61.
ShoveEPantzarM (2005) Consumers, producers and practices: understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. Journal of Consumer Culture5(1): 43–64.
62.
SouthertonD (2020) Time, Consumption and the Coordination of Everyday Life. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
63.
SovacoolBKFurszyfer Del RioDGriffithsS (2020) Contextualizing the Covid-19 pandemic for a carbon-constrained world: Insights for sustainability transitions, energy justice, and research methodology. Energy Research & Social Science68: 101701.
64.
SpurlingN (2018) Matters of time: materiality and the changing temporal organisation of everyday energy consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture21: 146–163. DOI: 10.1177/1469540518773818.
65.
The Guardian (2020b) Pent-Up Demand After Covid Lockdown Fuels UK House Sales Surge. London: The Guardian.
66.
The Guardian (2020a) Britons Go On Shopping Spree to Ease Grind of Covid-19 Confinement. London: The Guardian.
67.
The Guardian (2020c) UK’s 7,000 Gyms Prepare for Post-Lockdown Health Warning. London: The Guardian.
68.
WardeA (2005) Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture5(2): 131–153.
69.
WelchD (2020) Consumption and teleoaffective formations: consumer culture and commercial communications. Journal of Consumer Culture20(1): 61–82.
