This article applies social practice theory to study the emergence of sustainable consumption practices like bicycling among the new middle classes of Bangalore, India. I argue that expansions of bicycling practices are dependent on the construction of defensive distinctions, which I define as distinctions that draw equally on lifestyle-based and ethics-based discourses to normalize bicycling among Bangalore’s middle classes. With their environmental discourses and signage, middle-class cyclists make claims to being ethical actors and ecological citizens concerned about global environments. Their high-end bicycles and special gear enable them to maintain their social status in personal and professional circles, despite adopting what is an essentialized and stigmatized mobility practice in a social context where personal automobiles are a dominant symbol of respectability and propertied citizenship. These defensive distinctions are anchored in communities that facilitate social learning, skill-building, and the creation of collective identities. I highlight the importance of considering the role of ethical discourses in consolidating “low-status” social practices among “high-status” class fractions and discuss the implications of promoting sustainable consumption through the othering of the poor. By applying a social practice analytic to study middle-class bicycling practices, this article makes a significant contribution to the growing literature that investigates the applicability of practice-based approaches to environmental behaviors and sustainable consumption in a novel context.
AldredR (2010) “On the outside”: Constructing cycling citizenship. Social & Cultural Geography11(1): 35–52.
2.
AldredR (2013) Incompetent or too competent? Negotiating everyday cycling identities in a motor dominated society. Mobilities8(2): 252–271.
3.
AldredRJungnickelK (2014) Why culture matters for transport policy: The case of cycling in the UK. Journal of Transport Geography34: 78–87.
4.
ArnoldDDeWaldE (2011) Cycles of empowerment? The bicycle and everyday technology in colonial India and Vietnam. Comparative Studies in Society and History53(4): 971–996.
5.
Barendregt B and Jaffe R (eds) (2014) Green Consumption: The Global Rise of Eco-Chic. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
6.
BaviskarA (2003) Between violence and desire: Space, power, and identity in the making of metropolitan Delhi. International Social Science Journal55(175): 89–98.
7.
BaviskarA (2011) Cows, cars and cycle-rickshaws: Bourgeois environmentalism and the battle for Delhi’s streets. In: BaviskarARayR (eds) Elite and Everyman: The Cultural Politics of the Indian Middle Classes, New Delhi, India: Routledge, pp. 391–418.
8.
BaviskarARayR (2011) Introduction. In: BaviskarARayR (eds) Elite and Everyman: The Cultural Politics of the Indian Middle Classes, New Delhi, India: Routledge, pp. 1–23.
BijkerWE (1997) Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
BirtchnellT (2011) Jugaad as systemic risk and disruptive innovation in India. Contemporary South Asia19(4): 357–372.
12.
Birtchnell T (2012) Elites, elements and events: Practice theory and scale. Journal of Transport Geography (Special Section on Theoretical Perspectives on Climate Change Mitigation in Transport) 24: 497–502.
13.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
FernandesL (2009) The political economy of lifestyle: Consumption, India’s new middle class and state-led development. In: MeierLLangeH (eds) The New Middle Classes, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 219–236.
15.
FernandesLHellerP (2006) Hegemonic aspirations. Critical Asian Studies38(4): 495–522.
16.
FurnessZ (2005) Biketivism and technology: Historical reflections and appropriations. Social Epistemology19(4): 401–417.
17.
GhertnerA (2011) Gentrifying the state, gentrifying participation: Elite governance programs in Delhi. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35(3): 504–532.
18.
GhertnerA (2012) Nuisance talk and the propriety of property: Middle class discourses of a slum-free Delhi. Antipode44(4): 1161–1187.
19.
GiddensA (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
20.
GoldmanM (2011) Speculative urbanism and the making of the next world city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35(3): 555–581.
21.
GriskeviciusVTyburJMVan den BerghB (2010) Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology98(3): 392–404.
HalkierBKatz-GerroTMartensL (2011) Applying practice theory to the study of consumption: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Journal of Consumer Culture11(1): 3–13.
24.
HargreavesT (2011) Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture11(1): 79–99.
25.
HendersonJ (2013) Street Fight: The Struggle over Urban Mobility in San Francisco, Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
26.
HortonD (2003) Green distinctions: The performance of identity among environmental activists. The Sociological Review51: 63–77.
27.
HortonD (2006) Environmentalism and the bicycle. Environmental Politics15(1): 41–58.
28.
JaureguiB (2014) Provisional agency in India: Jugaad and legitimation of corruption. American Ethnologist41(1): 76–91.
29.
KozinetsRV (2010) Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online, London: Sage.
30.
LangeHMeierL (2009) The New Middle Classes: Globalizing Lifestyles, Consumerism and Environmental Concern, Dordrecht: Springer.
31.
LugoAE (2013) CicLAvia and human infrastructure in Los Angeles: Ethnographic experiments in equitable bike planning. Journal of Transport Geography30: 202–207.
32.
MagauddaP (2011) When materiality “bites back”: Digital music consumption practices in the age of dematerialization. Journal of Consumer Culture11(1): 15–36.
33.
MathurN (2010) Shopping malls, credit cards and global brands: Consumer culture and lifestyle among India’s new middle class. South Asia Research30: 211–231.
34.
MawdsleyE (2004) India’s middle classes and the environment. Development and Change35(1): 79–103.
35.
MawdsleyE (2009) “Environmentality” in the neoliberal city: Attitudes, governance and social justice. In: LangeHMeierL (eds) The New Middle Classes: Globalizing Lifestyles, Consumerism and Environmental Concern, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 237–251.
Mitchell D (2005) The S.U.V. model of citizenship: Floating bubbles, buffer zones, and the rise of the “purely atomic” individual. Political Geography (Political Geography Plenary Lecture, pp. 1–38) 24(1): 77–100.
38.
MyersNKentJ (2003) New consumers: The influence of affluence on the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America100(8): 4963–4968.
39.
MyersNKentJ (2004) The New Consumers: The Influence of Affluence on the Environment, Washington, DC: Island Press.
40.
NairJ (2005) The Promise of the Metropolis: Bangalore’s Twentieth Century, New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
41.
NairJ (2013) Is there an “Indian” Urbanism? In: RademacherASivaramakrishnanK (eds) Ecologies of Urbanism in India: Metropolitan Civility and Sustainability, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, pp. 43–70.
NortonPD (2011) Fighting Traffic: The Dawn of the Motor Age in the American City, 2nd printing edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44.
PucherJBuehlerRSeinenM (2011) Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice45(6): 451–475.
45.
Rahul TM and Verma A (2013) Economic impact of non-motorized transportation in Indian cities. Research in Transportation Economics (Economics of Sustainable Transport in India) 38(1): 22–34.
46.
Rao N (1991) Cycling into the Future: A Report on Women's Participation in a Literacy Campaign in Tamil Nadu, India. Gender, Technology and Development 3(3): 457–474. doi: 10.1177/097185249900300309.
47.
RayRQayuumS (2011) The middle classes at home. In: RayRBaviskarA (eds) Elite and Everyman: The Cultural Politics of the Indian Middle Classes, New Delhi, India: Routledge, pp. 246–270.
48.
ReckwitzA (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory5(2): 243–263.
49.
RøpkeI (2009) Theories of practice – New inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption. Ecological Economics68(2490): 2490–2497.
50.
SagarisL (2015) Lessons from 40 years of planning for cycle-inclusion: Reflections from Santiago, Chile. Natural Resources Forum39(1): 64–81.
51.
SahakianMWilhiteH (2014) Making practice theory practicable: Towards more sustainable forms of consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture14(1): 25–44.
52.
ShellerMUrryJ (2000) The city and the Car. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24(4): 737–757.
53.
ShoveE (2003) Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality, Oxford; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
54.
ShoveE (2010) Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A42(6): 1273–1285.
55.
ShoveEPantzarM (2005) Consumers, producers and practices understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. Journal of Consumer Culture5(1): 43–64.
56.
Shove E and Walker G (2010) Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy (Special Section on Innovation and Sustainability Transitions) 39(4): 471–476.
57.
ShoveEPantzarMWatsonM (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes, London: Sage.
58.
SinghRGuptaVMondalA (2012) Jugaad – From “Making Do” and “Quick Fix” to an innovative, sustainable and low-cost survival strategy at the bottom of the pyramid. International Journal of Rural Management8(1–2): 87–105.
59.
SoperK (2007) Re-thinking the “Good Life”: The citizenship dimension of consumer disaffection with consumerism. Journal of Consumer Culture7(2): 205–229.
60.
SpaargenG (2011) Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture: Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. Global Environmental Change21: 813–822.
61.
SrinivasanSRogersP (2005) Travel behavior of low-income residents: Studying two contrasting locations in the city of Chennai, India. Journal of Transport Geography13(3): 265–274.
62.
StehlinJ (2014) Regulating inclusion: Spatial form, social process, and the normalization of cycling practice in the USA. Mobilities9(1): 21–41.
TiwariG (2002) Urban transport priorities: Meeting the challenge of socio-economic diversity in cities, a case study of Delhi, India. Cities19(2): 95–103.
66.
Tiwari G and Jain D (2013) Promoting low carbon transport in India: NMT infrastructure in India: Investment, Policy and Design. Available at: http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1267790.
UpadhyaC (2009) India’s “New Middle Class” and the globalizing city: Software professionals in Bangalore, India. In: LangeHMeierL (eds) The New Middle Classes, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 253–268.
69.
UrryJ (2004) The “System” of automobility. Theory, Culture & Society21(4–5): 25–39.
70.
UrryJ (2007) Mobilities, Oxford: Polity.
71.
VivancoLA (2013) Reconsidering the Bicycle: An Anthropological Perspective on a New (Old) Thing, New York; London: Routledge.
72.
WardeA (2005) Consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture5(2): 131–153.
73.
Watson M (2012) How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system. Journal of Transport Geography (Special Section on Theoretical Perspectives on Climate Change Mitigation in Transport) 24: 488–496.
74.
WilhiteH (2008) Consumption and the Transformation of Everyday Life: A View from South India, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
