Although expectant mothers have long purchased items in preparation for their baby’s birth, the timing and type of purchases being made have changed in response to pregnant women routinely learning the sex of their fetus through ultrasound. This article examines changes in these consumption patterns through data drawn from personal narratives with 25 women divided between two cohorts—those who gave birth in the 2000s and those who gave birth in the1970s. The routine use of ultrasound has encouraged changes in beliefs about the relationship between a fetus and its mother in younger women, which in turn inspires earlier purchases of baby items than was normative 30 years before. Not enough attention is being paid to the fact that newborn babies are more likely today than three decades ago to spend their first few months wearing gendered clothing and being surrounded by gender-specific furniture and objects, which their mothers are purchasing during pregnancy.
CasperLMBianchiSM (2001) Trends in the American Family, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7.
Center for Disease Control (2011) Preliminary ART fertility clinic success rates report. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ART/. (accessed 9 May 2013).
8.
CookDT (2004) The Commodification of Childhood, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
CookDT (2008) The missing child in consumption theory. Journal of Consumer Culture8(2): 219–243.
10.
Damaske S (2011) For the Family? How Class and Gender Shape Women’s Work. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
DeVaultM (1991) Feeding the Family: The Social Organization of Caring as Gendered Work, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
DouglasMIsherwoodB (1979) The World of Goods, New York: Basic Books.
13.
FeatherstoneM (1991) Consumer Culture and Postmodernism, London: Sage.
14.
Galinsky, E, Aumann K and Bond JT (2011) Times Are Changing: Gender and generation at work and at home. Report of the 2008 National Study of the Changing Workforce, Families and Work Institute. New York City, New York. Originally issued 2009, revised August 2011.
15.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago, IL: Aldine.
17.
GreggR (1995) Pregnancy in a High-tech Age: Paradoxes of Choice, New York: New York University Press.
18.
HarawayD (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium, New York: Routledge.
19.
Hays S (1996) The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
HochschildA (1989) The Second Shift, New York: Avon.
21.
HochschildA (2003) The Commercialization of Intimate Life, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22.
Katz RothmanB (1986) Tentative Pregnancy: How Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood, New York: Norton.
23.
Katz RothmanB (1989) Recreating Motherhood: Ideology and Technology in a Patriarchal Society, New York: Norton.
24.
Katz RothmanB (1994) The tentative pregnancy: Then and now. In: RothenbergKHThomasEJ (eds) Women and Prenatal Testing: Facing the Challenges of Genetic Testing, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, pp. 260–270.
25.
Krefting L (1999) Rigor in Qualitative Research: The Assessment of Trustworthiness. In: Milinki A (ed.) Cases in Qualitative Research: Research Reports for Discussion and Evaluation. Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak Publishing.
26.
LayneL (2000) “He was a real baby with baby things”: A material culture analysis of personhood, parenthood and pregnancy loss. Journal of Material Culture5(3): 321–345.
27.
Lorber J (1994) The Paradoxes of Gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
MarleauJSaucierJF (2002) Preference for a first-born boy in western society. Journal of Biosocial Science34(1): 13–27.
29.
MartensL (2004) Bringing children and parents into the sociology of consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture4(2): 155–182.
30.
MillerD (1998) A Theory of Shopping, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
31.
MitchellL (2001) Baby’s first picture: Ultrasound and the politics of fetal subjects, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
32.
MitchellLGeorgesE (1997) Cross-cultural cyborgs: Greek and Canadian women’s discourses on fetal ultrasound. Feminist Studies23(2): 373–401.
33.
NicolaidesKHChervenakFAMcCulloughLB (2005) Evidence-based obstetric ethics and informed decision-making by pregnant women about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester assessment of risk for trisomy 21. American Journal Obstetrics & Gynecology193(2): 322–326.
34.
OakleyA (1980) Women Confined: Toward a Sociology of Childbirth, Oxford: Martin Roberston.
35.
OakleyA (1984) The Captured Womb: A History of the Medical Care of Pregnant Women, Oxford: Basil Blackwell Publishers.
36.
PaolettiJ (2012) Pink and Blue: Telling the Boys from the Girls in America, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
37.
PetcheskyR (1987) Fetal images: The power of visual culture in the politics of reproduction. Feminist Studies13(2): 263–292.
38.
Pugh A (2009) Longing and Belonging: Parents, Children, and Consumer Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
39.
SandelowskiM (1994) Separate, but less equal: Fetal ultrasonography and the transformation of expectant mother/fatherhood. Gender and Society8(2): 230–245.
40.
TaylorJ (2000) Of sonograms and baby prams: Prenatal diagnosis, pregnancy and consumption. Feminist Studies26(2): 391–418.
41.
TaylorJ (2008) The Public Life of the Fetal Sonogram: Technology, Consumption and the Politics of Reproduction, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
42.
TaylorJLayneLWozniakD (2004) Consuming Motherhood, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
43.
WardeA (1994) Consumption, identity-formation, and uncertainty. Sociology28(4): 877–898.
44.
WeissR (1994) Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies, New York: The Free Press.
